Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 27 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Reith_bei_Seefeld_-_Pfarrkirche_hl_Nikolaus_-_Fenster_St_Petrus.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stained glass window of Parish Church Reith bei Seefeld, showing Saint Peter. --Haeferl 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The window is distorted and needs perspective correction. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Corrected. Yann 20:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
    •   Question Have you made the corrections from the raw files, Yann? --Hubertl 20:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
      • No, I am not the author, and I don't have the RAW. IMO this is now good enough to be QI, but if the author remakes the correction from RAW, it's even better. Yann 20:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
        • IMO it is not a good way to modify a JPEG file. The author should do this job with his RAW file. Modifying a JPEG file is nearly always a loss of quality. (You can see for example the file size.) I would be annoyed if someone changed my pictures. ;-) BTW: I've seen the author reverted the edits. --XRay 18:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective distortion. I have edited 100s of images from others. Usually people are happy to get some help. Yann 20:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective must be corrected. There is also to consider that the whole image must be straightened to some degree (in my opinion about 1/4), for the window is too broad, caused by the viewing angle (from the floor up to the window). --Llez 12:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined Peulle 13:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Reith_bei_Seefeld_-_Pfarrkirche_hl_Nikolaus_-_Fenster_St_Paulus.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Stained glass window of Parish Church Reith bei Seefeld, showing Saint Paul. --Haeferl 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --A.Savin 02:00, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The window is very distorted and dark. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Corrected. Yann 20:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
  • BTW: Reverted by the author. (It is not good to modify images if you are not the author.) --XRay 19:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective distortion. I have edited 100s of images from others. Usually people are happy to get some help. Yann 21:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:22, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Perspective must be corrected. There is also to consider that the whole image must be straightened to some degree (in my opinion about 1/4), for the window is too broad, caused by the viewing angle (from the floor up to the window). --Llez 12:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 13:03, 26 November 2016 (UTC)