Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 28 2019

Consensual review edit

File:Світанок_на_р._Десна.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mizhrichynskyi Regional Landscape Park. By User:Andrii Parakhin --Anntinomy 22:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment Beautiful photo, but the sky is posterized and the artificial edges between the colors have to be smoothed out. If that's done, this might be a good FP candidate, but until it's done, it's not a QI to me. I'll wait a day or so, to give a chance for corrective work or a promise to do some soon, then I would oppose. -- Ikan Kekek 08:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose for now per my remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support For me it's okay fro a QI. --Steindy 18:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:41, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Lienden,_moderne_windmolens_aan_de_Zilverlandseweg_IMG_2450_2019-09-15_09.54.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Lienden-NL, windfarm at the Zilverlandseweg --Michielverbeek 07:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Lots of noise, not sharp enough, and the towers & blades do not clearly stand out against the sky. --Axel Tschentscher 12:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. Maybe the exposure and/or contrast could be enhanced somewhat, but both sharpness and noise level are acceptable. --Smial 09:29, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support - Not very noisy, IMO, and sharp enough. The only thing that bugs me is the pitch black shadowed areas, but the overall picture is acceptable, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan. --Aristeas 14:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Contrast and exposure needs to be fixed --GRDN711 13:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

  Comment I have increased   Done the contrast a bit --Michielverbeek 20:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

  Comment Still opposed as still too dark --GRDN711 01:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Milseburg 14:37, 27 November 2019 (UTC)