Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 23 2020

Consensual review

edit

File:Pediment_of_the_South_portico_and_colonnade_of_St._Isaac's_Cathedral.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The pediment of the South portico with the bas-relief "adoration of the Magi" and the colonnade of St. Isaac's Cathedral. 4 Isaakievskaya square, Admiralteysky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 06:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose strong halo-effect due highlight tweaking. --Kallerna 11:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Kallerna. -- Smial 10:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:46, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Pieve_di_San_Giovanni_in_Petroio_-_Barberino_di_Mugello.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Parish church of San Giovanni in Petroio. --PROPOLI87 20:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Comment It is tilted approx. 1° --PantheraLeo1359531 20:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Done correct inclination.PROPOLI87 07:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment The sky looks quite blown to me but I am unsure. --Vincent60030 09:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment The light was strong and white at the time of shooting, if I had made any changes, the image of the cross above the church would have been affected, which instead is clear, as it should be.PROPOLI87 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, sky is not blown or shining on the house, so I think it is okay --PantheraLeo1359531 16:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Blown sky. --Kallerna 11:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The sky is blown. Also, the detail level on the stone wall is low (especially considering the resolution), and the sides are leaning in.--Peulle 09:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yeah, I give people a lot of latitude with bright white skies, but that sky is really blown. -- Ikan Kekek 10:55, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   CommentAll the fault of this bad 2020! I'm kidding of course! If you think the sky is not good no problem! We decline the photo! PROPOLI87 08:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 11:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Área_de_Proteção_Ambiental_da_Baleia_Franca_Claudio_Seelig_(01).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Ctseelig --Rodrigo.Argenton 13:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose nice lighting, but the stones are very soft --Tesla 15:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Given the 30 sec exposure to get the smooth effect in the evening light, some softness is acceptable. A QI to me. --Tagooty 05:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support There is rather low contrast on the rocks. This is sometimes confused with low sharpness. Regarding the high resolution the image is sharp enough. Good composition and lighting, colours appear natural. -- Smial 09:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Tagooty --Jakubhal 13:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I agree with Tagooty. I like the smoothness and softness of the lighting. --Lion-hearted85 11:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)