Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 02 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Stegna_Gdańska_01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination MBxd2 motor car on the narrow gauge train station, Stegna Gdańska, Poland --Karol Szapsza 10:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree; it's not sharp enough. Even the front of the train (right side from viewer's perspective) is unsharp.--Peulle 11:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose IMO not sharp enough. Tilted, too. --Basotxerri 16:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --W.carter 08:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

File:2017-08-11_TuS_Koblenz_vs._SG_Dynamo_Dresden_(DFB-Pokal)_by_Sandro_Halank–016.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Fabian Müller (SG Dynamo Dresden) --Sandro Halank 13:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   strong oppose This just looks way too artificial. PumpkinSky 15:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I see no problem with the choice of focus. --King of Hearts 20:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment It's not just the focus. Something seems off to me about this. Maybe it's over sharpened. It looks like the player in focus was pasted in. The two players in front are so out of focus they have halos around them. PumpkinSky 22:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment He isn´t pasted in, he is ca. 30 meters behind the other player and the referee and it´s f/2.8. --Sandro Halank 23:25, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me, nice use of DoF. However I wish that the two players out of focus were less dominant in the composition. --Basotxerri (talk) 07:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
    •   CommentThat's another thing I don't like, the composition makes the subject seem to be a secondary subject. PumpkinSky 11:13, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per PumpkinSky --Milseburg 12:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Definitely not. This just isn't the way you take a photo - by letting two people stand in the way of your shot, especially on a wide open field like a football pitch.--Peulle 14:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No good composition, not only because of the sharpness -- Spurzem 09:44, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I think it looks weird, too. -- Ikan Kekek 20:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Spurzem, --Tournasol7 22:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose. This is an excellent picture for demonstrating strange uses of depth of field, but not much else. Guanaco (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Guanaco, you can't vote and close a CR at the same time. The closing is not done until a minimum of 48 hours after the last vote. Please read the rules a bit more carefully. You could have just closed this, but by voting you prolonged this voting by an extra 48 hours. Also if/when you close a CR, you should also change the 'Discuss' to 'Decline' or 'Promotion' (I also used to forget that in the beginning). --W.carter 08:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Ok, since you've struck your vote, I'll just close this. --W.carter 09:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose →   Declined   --W.carter 09:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)