Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 06 2017

Consensual review edit

File:Bara_Shiva_Temple,_Puthia_10.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination বড় শিব মন্দির পুঠিয়া রাজবাড়ির মন্দিরের একটি। এটি বাংলাদেশ প্রত্নতত্ত্ব অধিদপ্তর এর তালিকাভুক্ত একটি প্রত্নতাত্ত্বিক স্থাপনা।. By User:Nahid.rajbd --Moheen Reeyad 17:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Sorry, this composition/perspective isn't working. --C messier 06:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment This is not FP. As long as the quality is OK, it should be fine. --Yann 11:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment This is not FP, but this perspective really distorts the building. --C messier 09:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support The perspective is OK for QI. Yann 09:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Very distorted - leaning one way on one side and the other way on the other side. I don't think it's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 09:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --PumpkinSky 21:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Paris_-_Bonhams_2016_-_Tibet_-_Mandala_d'Ushnishavijaya_-_circa_1500-1550_-_002.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Mandala de 50.9 x 44.2 cm sur un support en soie de 85.2 x 48.4 cm originaire du centre Tibet représentant Ushnishavijaya. --Thesupermat 14:52, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Oppose C'est un détail, n'est-ce pas? Je n'aime pas trop les coupures (crops en anglais). -- Ikan Kekek 06:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Not done within a week. PumpkinSky 01:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support No problem with this crop IMO. --Yann 11:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 09:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

  Comment @ W.carter, sorry, the two edits were at the same time. --Palauenc05 09:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --W.carter 08:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Ship_in_the_SF_Bay_fog_(40406).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Ship in the fog on San Francisco Bay. (I liked the drama of the shot, but don't know if it's QI material) --Rhododendrites 06:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment I like it too, so can you do some (color) de-noising? --PtrQs 22:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment Bumping -- will try to get to this tonight, though will have to renominate the one that was just archived. Thanks. Rhododendrites 17:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment New version uploaded. Rhododendrites 04:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support OK, the clouds and waves look smoother now. --PtrQs 17:10, 01 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry for a late review. But IMO it is not QI. Too strong vignettes. --XRay 12:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
  • @XRay: the vignetting is not artificial, if that's what you mean. There are multiple groups of fog clouds over the bay, and here the ship is somehow in a little light patch with dark fog on either side. I don't know if I'm describing that well, but the image is basically as it looked in reality. Rhododendrites 00:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support I think I can follow your arguments. It's a very special picture. --XRay 07:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
  Support --Yann 09:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - This photo is all about atmosphere. For an FP nomination, some of the water in front of the ship could be cropped out, but as a QI, this works. -- Ikan Kekek 09:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 19:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)