Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 15 2017

< Commons:Quality images candidates
  • * Nomination Weights at Frederiksholms Kanal, Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Weights at Frederiksholms Kanal, Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bredgade, Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bredgade, Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Mooring rings at the port, Copenhagen, DenmarkEnglish: Mooring rings at the port of Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment And a potential FP candidate? -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Mooring rings at the port, Copenhagen, DenmarkEnglish: Mooring rings at the port of Copenhagen, Denmark --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment And a potential FP candidate? -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Former Bundesrat, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Former Bundesrat, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination St Paul Cathedral and St Lamberti Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination St Paul Cathedral and St Lamberti Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ficus auriculata--Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ficus auriculata--Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Callidrepana patrana --Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Callidrepana patrana --Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cleome pentaphylla--Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cleome pentaphylla--Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dolichandrone spathacea --Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dolichandrone spathacea --Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Dolichandrone spathacea --Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dolichandrone spathacea --Vengolis 02:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Parish church Saint Bartholomew, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Parish church Saint Bartholomew, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Castle ruin Rotturm, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Castle ruin Rotturm, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Romanesque portal of the former charnel house at the parish church Saint Bartholomew, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Romanesque portal of the former charnel house at the parish church Saint Bartholomew, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Western view of the former provost house on Wiener Strasse #6, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Western view of the former provost house on Wiener Strasse #6, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion good quality. PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Defense tower, subsidiary church Saint Peter on Petersberg #209 and former rectory on Petersbergweg #7, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Gorgeous! FP PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Defense tower, subsidiary church Saint Peter on Petersberg #209 and former rectory on Petersbergweg #7, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Gorgeous! FP PumpkinSky 02:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Globe Sundial, Swansea, Wales. --Stu's Images 22:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 22:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Globe Sundial, Swansea, Wales. --Stu's Images 22:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 22:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Jorsand, Fotoflug über das nordfriesische Wattenmeer --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 22:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Jorsand, Fotoflug über das nordfriesische Wattenmeer --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 22:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Uthörn, Jorsand und Ellenbogen im Norden von Sylt --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 22:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination Uthörn, Jorsand und Ellenbogen im Norden von Sylt --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Sputniktilt 22:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  • * Nomination New York City, Penn Stationl --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Nomination New York City, Penn Stationl --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Consensual review edit

File:Cret_Hurtière_Cirque_Sure.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Hurtières Circus --MirandaAdramin 13:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Unless most of the panoramas, this really is sharp! Could you please delete two dustspots (see annotations) and correct that disturbingly highlighted patch of grass in the front? --PtrQs 14:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done Thanks for your report. Done for the dustspots. I tried to fix this light difference in the grass. I hope it's better.--MirandaAdramin 15:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes, it's better. Tres joli! Good quality for me. Tournasol7 20:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  • @MirandaAdramin I'm very, very sorry to do this, but as someone else has gratuitously promoted this image before the end of our review/improvements, I'll have to bring it to discussion. Otherwise I had asked you to further darken the too lighted stitch (in LR: Ctrl-Alt-Shft-M). But I'm sure, we can sort this out. --PtrQs 22:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Nothing is disturbing me in this very good photo. The patch of grass that is lighter doubtless was lit by a break in the clouds, and it's not very light. -- Ikan Kekek 07:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
    •   Comment I feel a bit misunderstood: this image is far better than many QI-panoramas, I've seen here. But if I open it in a viewer, I automatically focus on this light patch of grass with a different WB. So I saw a possibility to enhance the already high quality and wanted to encourage harmonizing this single source with the other stitched images, to make the result a perfect panorama. I have no doubt that this is a QI. --PtrQs 11:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
      • I do understand your approach. But I've fixed as best as I can the light difference, that comes also from the sun and the exposition (you can compare the two versions). If I get further, it turns over processed, the change turns worst.--MirandaAdramin (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support per Ikan --W.carter 09:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I would promote if there is not the stitcherror on the horizon right of the spruces. --Milseburg 12:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
    • I will see if I can do something, but I fear that the soft has troubles with clouds. [Same problem than the other one] --MirandaAdramin 15:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done To Milseburg & PtrQs : I made an other version of this panorama that fix the two problems, could you please have a look ? --MirandaAdramin 07:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Sorry for being pedantic. It´s an interesting pano and the size is even larger now then before. The stitcherror moved a bit to the right. I wouldn´t have noticed it at first sight. There is a step in the slope, which wasn´t there before and a summit above this point seems to be gone. --Milseburg 12:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality --Billy69150 12:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --PumpkinSky 23:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz_W111C_Kulmbach_17RM0452.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz W111C at the oldtimer meeting in Kulmbach --Ermell 06:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Main photo subject is blurred --Nino Verde 08:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree, imho sharp enough --Berthold Werner 10:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - Not even close, and look how big the file is. -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. The front is a bit dark and the rear side very bright. Further the background I would like less sharp. But the car is sharp enough. -- Spurzem 19:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think that this photo is a little bit backfocused, some parts of the car front are less sharp than the background --Shansov.net 01:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Front is not sharp and there are some pixel artefacts in the front wheel housing --PtrQs 11:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
  Comment O. K. I see two death gnats in the wind-shield which should have been removed before taking this photo. But I think that is no reason to decline. -- Spurzem 19:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --PumpkinSky 23:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

== edit

  • Nomination St Jovan Vladimir church in Bar, Montenegro --DmitriyGuryanov 06:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose No COM:FOP#Montenegro. --C messier 03:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree. For I see a good composition – perhaps a bit tight crop below –, a wonderful atmosphere and good sharpness. -- ~~~~
  •   Support Obviously it was a technical problem that my name was not notified. -- Spurzem 12:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Vote struck out since it is anonymous. If the user making this vote sees this, please fix your signature and restore the vote. --W.carter 09:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Spurzem, this photo has copyright issues and might be even deleted. --C messier 12:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --PumpkinSky 23:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_September_15_2017&oldid=524661098"