Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 17 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Porsche Junior 108 (1959).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Porsche Junior 108 (1959), Traktormuseum Bodensee --Llez 14:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Quite good. --Jacek79 18:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. I disagree. The composition is not good for the tractor has no good place to be presented. No good lighting. The description plate is too bright and the shadow of the steering wheel is disturbing. Sorry -- Spurzem 19:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Focus is too far in into the pic, leaving headlight and front wheel unsharp but objects on the wall behind the tractor rather sharp. Light is bad, makes the different parts of the tractor blend in with each other. Direct flashlight not always such a good idea. There is a lot if CA in the pic, this is fixable though. W.carter 11:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment This is definitely fixable; the composition seems OK, since there is an object to the right that probably prevents the photographer from changing the angle (museum shots are difficult). The lighting is what needs work.--Peulle 16:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree that the composition is accepable for a museum shot and if you think you can fix all the light issues and CAs, then I'll certainly reconsider. Not sure if this can make up for the focus issue though, but we'll see. W.carter 17:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Museum shots are difficult indeed. But this fact makes a poor image not better. Due to the very short focal distance the Porsche Junior looks too unrealistic. -- Spurzem 18:58, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Some things pointed out are correctable, others (like the angle of view) not. So I think it is the best to   I withdraw my nomination --Llez 10:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 11:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Tarragona_-_Necrópolis.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Roman necropolis ruins in Tarragona --Rafesmar 11:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree sorry, nearly nothing in focus here --A.Savin 10:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharp, and really bad processing. Nowhere near a QI, IMO.--Peulle 08:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 10:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC
  •   Oppose Wav, very very poor quality--Lmbuga 21:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 08:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Sant_Saeran_Llanynys_Sir_Ddinbych_Denbighshire_North_Wales_45.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Mediaeval painting on wall of St Christopher and Christ. St. Saeran's church, Llanynys, Denbighshire, North Wales is a Grade 1 listed building. In 2015 a £4.5 million project came to an end, preserving this church. --Llywelyn2000 07:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Improvable. Vertical lines are tilted CCW (see notes). I don't like the detail of the walls--Lmbuga 15:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
    Underexposed IMO--Lmbuga 21:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)