Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 20 2016

< Commons:Quality images candidates
  • * Nomination Dechambeau Hotel and I.O.O.F. Hall, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Dechambeau Hotel and I.O.O.F. Hall, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination County Barn, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination County Barn, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 1927 Dodge-Graham, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination 1927 Dodge-Graham, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 04:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Salzer house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Salzer house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Salzer house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Salzer house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Moertlbauer granary (historic cereal store), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Moertlbauer granary (historic cereal store), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lavanttaler house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lavanttaler house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Lavanttaler house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Lavanttaler house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination A Twin Otter starts its takeoff on a grass airstrip in the remote Canadian Arctic. --Daniel Case 02:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination A Twin Otter starts its takeoff on a grass airstrip in the remote Canadian Arctic. --Daniel Case 02:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fireweed gone to seed. --W.carter 22:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fireweed gone to seed. --W.carter 22:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 22:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Detail of the new gothic tower monstrance from around 1850 in the parish church St. Mauritius in Mülheim-Kärlich -- Spurzem 20:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 00:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Detail of the new gothic tower monstrance from around 1850 in the parish church St. Mauritius in Mülheim-Kärlich -- Spurzem 20:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 00:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination New gothic tower monstrance from around 1850 in the parish church St. Mauritius in Mülheim-Kärlich -- Spurzem 20:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination New gothic tower monstrance from around 1850 in the parish church St. Mauritius in Mülheim-Kärlich -- Spurzem 20:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Coast of Mahdia, Tunisia --Fatma Hamdi 20:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline Beautiful sunset but too unsharp. --King of Hearts 03:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Coast of Mahdia, Tunisia --Fatma Hamdi 20:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Beautiful sunset but too unsharp. --King of Hearts 03:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gate of Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 1 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 19:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gate of Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 1 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 19:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Gate of Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 2 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 19:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gate of Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 2 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 19:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 1 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 1 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 2 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Holy Cross Monastery on Łysa Góra 2 --Kroton 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Common alder (Alnus glutinosa), Dunarea Veche natural protected area, Macin, Romania --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 19:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Common alder (Alnus glutinosa), Dunarea Veche natural protected area, Macin, Romania --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 19:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ollagüe, Chile --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ollagüe, Chile --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Government Palace, Lima, Peru --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Government Palace, Lima, Peru --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, Baltra Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, Baltra Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination View from the "holy stone!, municipality Mitterretzbach, Weinviertel, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 18:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 18:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Observation tower, Platt, municipality Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 18:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Would be better if brightened though. --King of Hearts 03:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Winemaker alley, so called Steam-stone, which is part of the traditional exhausting system of traditional wine cellars, Maulavern In Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 18:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 22:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Winemaker alley, so called Steam-stone, which is part of the traditional exhausting system of traditional wine cellars, Maulavern In Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 18:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 22:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Neurothemis intermedia- male --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Neurothemis intermedia- male --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ipomoea pes-caprae --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ipomoea pes-caprae --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Polytela gloriosae (caterpillar) --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Polytela gloriosae (caterpillar) --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Delias eucharis --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Delias eucharis --Vengolis 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Debki – the border post of the former border of the Second Republic of poland with the German Reich. --ArkadiuszZ 17:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Superb bokeh, very nice! And extraordinary sharp where it has to be. --Basotxerri 18:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Debki – the border post of the former border of the Second Republic of poland with the German Reich. --ArkadiuszZ 17:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Superb bokeh, very nice! And extraordinary sharp where it has to be. --Basotxerri 18:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Christ the King Monument in Swiebodzin, Marzec 2014 --ArkadiuszZ 17:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Kroton 18:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Christ the King Monument in Swiebodzin, Marzec 2014 --ArkadiuszZ 17:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Kroton 18:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Arnsberg Forest Nature Park --Wikimatze 16:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline Insufficient quality. Too much blown branches in the sky area, some overexposed ferns. --W.carter 22:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Arnsberg Forest Nature Park --Wikimatze 16:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. Too much blown branches in the sky area, some overexposed ferns. --W.carter 22:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Catholic parish church of St. Leonard in Zentbechhofen in Hoechstadt an der Aisch --Ermell 15:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Halavar 16:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Catholic parish church of St. Leonard in Zentbechhofen in Hoechstadt an der Aisch --Ermell 15:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 16:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fishermen houses on the banks of the Regnitz in Bamberg --Ermell 15:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Halavar 17:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fishermen houses on the banks of the Regnitz in Bamberg --Ermell 15:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 17:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Zamoyski Palace in Kozlowka. --ArkadiuszZ 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bas-relief on the building. Shota Rustaveli Ave. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion The quality is OK but as I suppose that the bricks are of the same size it seems that there is some distortion. Perhaps you could correct it (by a horizontal correction)? --Basotxerri 14:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Done You were right, thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC) That's it! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bas-relief on the building. Shota Rustaveli Ave. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion The quality is OK but as I suppose that the bricks are of the same size it seems that there is some distortion. Perhaps you could correct it (by a horizontal correction)? --Basotxerri 14:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
      ✓ Done You were right, thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
      That's it! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Men playing backgammon. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline Not sharp enoug.Sorry. --Ermell 21:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Men playing backgammon. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Not sharp enoug.Sorry. --Ermell 21:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Fountain on the central square. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Sharp enough for a Q1photo, also perspective good enough. IMO I would crop more of the top for emphasizing the fountain --Michielverbeek 15:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fountain on the central square. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Sharp enough for a Q1photo, also perspective good enough. IMO I would crop more of the top for emphasizing the fountain --Michielverbeek 15:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Independence Day of Georgia - May 26, 2014. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment I really don't like these motives --Tsungam 13:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline *  Oppose I also don't like these motives, but that is not a good reason for declining. The bottom crop does not satisfy me, it's too narrow. The boy and the weapons are the main objects and the weapons are cut, so I decline this image --Michielverbeek 15:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Independence Day of Georgia - May 26, 2014. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
       Comment I really don't like these motives --Tsungam 13:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline *  Oppose I also don't like these motives, but that is not a good reason for declining. The bottom crop does not satisfy me, it's too narrow. The boy and the weapons are the main objects and the weapons are cut, so I decline this image --Michielverbeek 15:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kurhaus Bad Hamm --Wikimatze 12:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kurhaus Bad Hamm --Wikimatze 12:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Kurhaus Bad Hamm --Wikimatze 12:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Nice and crisp. --Peulle 15:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Kurhaus Bad Hamm --Wikimatze 12:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Nice and crisp. --Peulle 15:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cuxhaven: Karl-Olfers-Platz --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion I think this is still acceptable but it seems a bit oversaturated to me. --Basotxerri 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cuxhaven: Karl-Olfers-Platz --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion I think this is still acceptable but it seems a bit oversaturated to me. --Basotxerri 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cuxhaven: The Hamburg Lighthouse at the port --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion good quality --Kroton 12:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cuxhaven: The Hamburg Lighthouse at the port --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion good quality --Kroton 12:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cuxhaven: Hapag Hall at the port --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cuxhaven: Hapag Hall at the port --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cuxhaven: viewpoint and port tower --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality --Kroton 12:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cuxhaven: viewpoint and port tower --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality --Kroton 12:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cuxhaven: fishing boat on the Wadden Sea --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cuxhaven: fishing boat on the Wadden Sea --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Angra do Heroismo. --Kallerna 10:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline Insufficient quality. Many problems: The horizon needs correction. Artefacts in the sky. Blown out facades, flare in the lower left part. --Milseburg 15:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Angra do Heroismo. --Kallerna 10:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. Many problems: The horizon needs correction. Artefacts in the sky. Blown out facades, flare in the lower left part. --Milseburg 15:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Spain, Granada, Alhambra, Casas del Partal --Berthold Werner 09:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Spain, Granada, Alhambra, Casas del Partal --Berthold Werner 09:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Spain, Cordoba, roman bridge --Berthold Werner 09:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Spain, Cordoba, roman bridge --Berthold Werner 09:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Waldemarsudde, east facade of the main building. --ArildV 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Waldemarsudde, east facade of the main building. --ArildV 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Aschaffenburg, Stiftsgasse 1. By User:Tilman2007 --Berthold Werner 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Needs little additional crop at the right and down parts of the image. But only IMO.--Aeou 11:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Aschaffenburg, Stiftsgasse 1. By User:Tilman2007 --Berthold Werner 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Needs little additional crop at the right and down parts of the image. But only IMO.--Aeou 11:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Saint Petersburg Metro Administration Building --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Saint Petersburg Metro Administration Building --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination House at Beringa Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination House at Beringa Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination House at Odoevskogo Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Sharp enough, perspective good enough, quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination House at Odoevskogo Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Sharp enough, perspective good enough, quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bus MAZ-203.085 in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bus MAZ-203.085 in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Bus NefAZ-5299-30-32 in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Bus NefAZ-5299-30-32 in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Roadside chapel on Droszkowska Pass --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Roadside chapel on Droszkowska Pass --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church in Stronie Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church in Stronie Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Krzyżnik, Bialskie Mountains, Sudes --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Krzyżnik, Bialskie Mountains, Sudes --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Wayside cross in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 08:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Wayside cross in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 08:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Cows,free roaming on the pastures of the Gorbea mountain range; Cross of Gorbea. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Cows,free roaming on the pastures of the Gorbea mountain range; Cross of Gorbea. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Rock of Iñiger in the Gorbea mountain range; view over the Alavese Plains. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Perhaps a bit hazy but altough a good view. --Milseburg 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Rock of Iñiger in the Gorbea mountain range; view over the Alavese Plains. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Perhaps a bit hazy but altough a good view. --Milseburg 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Landscape on the Mairulegorreta trail to Gorbea summit; beeches. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Landscape on the Mairulegorreta trail to Gorbea summit; beeches. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Summit of Gorbea, summit cross. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Summit of Gorbea, summit cross. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Genzianella between Porphyr rocks) on in Gröden --Moroder 07:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. Useful. --Jkadavoor 13:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Genzianella between Porphyr rocks) on in Gröden --Moroder 07:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. Useful. --Jkadavoor 13:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Duttaphrynus melanostictus --Jkadavoor 07:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Duttaphrynus melanostictus --Jkadavoor 07:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Genzianella on the Resciesa pasture in Gröden - South Tyrol. --Moroder 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Genzianella on the Resciesa pasture in Gröden - South Tyrol. --Moroder 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination X station of the cross. Jesus is stripped of His garments. 18th century fresco on the St. Jacob church in Urtijëi, in Val Gardena. --Moroder 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination X station of the cross. Jesus is stripped of His garments. 18th century fresco on the St. Jacob church in Urtijëi, in Val Gardena. --Moroder 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Keshav Narayan Chowk-Patan Museum- Patan Durbar --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline Not enough quality for a Q1photo. Main object is not detailed enough and the top is a bit overexposed; the focus is not good. Leaves in the background have got a white part and this might be caused because of having a dirty lense.--Michielverbeek 06:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Keshav Narayan Chowk-Patan Museum- Patan Durbar --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Not enough quality for a Q1photo. Main object is not detailed enough and the top is a bit overexposed; the focus is not good. Leaves in the background have got a white part and this might be caused because of having a dirty lense.--Michielverbeek 06:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Keshav Narayan Chowk-Patan Museum- Patan Durbar --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO it's overexposed at the roof and it needs perspective correction. --XRay 06:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Keshav Narayan Chowk-Patan Museum- Patan Durbar --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO it's overexposed at the roof and it needs perspective correction. --XRay 06:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Buldern manor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Buldern manor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ore bunkers in Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord in Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ore bunkers in Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord in Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Jewish Cemetery, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion OK, --A.Savin 12:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Jewish Cemetery, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion OK, --A.Savin 12:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Ship “Rickmer Rickmers” and Saint Michael's church, Hamburg, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Ship “Rickmer Rickmers” and Saint Michael's church, Hamburg, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Pont d'Occitanie (bridge) over the Orb River in Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Pont d'Occitanie (bridge) over the Orb River in Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Canal du Midi, close to the Pont-Canal. Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Canal du Midi, close to the Pont-Canal. Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Argyreia hirsuta --Jkadavoor 05:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Argyreia hirsuta --Jkadavoor 05:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Methodist Church, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Methodist Church, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Herb garden next to the Hanebauer house, open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline  Oppose sorry, but it is overexposed, not fixable as the leaves have burned out --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Done It is unfair of you, @Christian Ferrer: , not to concede me the possibility of cropping out the insignificant upper part with the objected burned out leaves. Please, pay a second look at the photo now.--Johann Jaritz 06:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC) no, sorry, there are too much areas of pure white instead of the green color of the leaves and grass Christian Ferrer 07:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Well, then it is sealed. --Johann Jaritz 08:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC) The issue was not specially at top but in the whole image for me, the crop is not needed --Christian Ferrer 15:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Yes, your arguments make sense, the picture`s issues are too many for becoming a QI. Agreed! --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Herb garden next to the Hanebauer house, open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline  Oppose sorry, but it is overexposed, not fixable as the leaves have burned out --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done It is unfair of you, @Christian Ferrer: , not to concede me the possibility of cropping out the insignificant upper part with the objected burned out leaves. Please, pay a second look at the photo now.--Johann Jaritz 06:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC) no, sorry, there are too much areas of pure white instead of the green color of the leaves and grass Christian Ferrer 07:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Well, then it is sealed. --Johann Jaritz 08:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC) The issue was not specially at top but in the whole image for me, the crop is not needed --Christian Ferrer 15:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Yes, your arguments make sense, the picture`s issues are too many for becoming a QI. Agreed! --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The ruins of Kenilworth Castle keep --DeFacto 22:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Comment is the perspective ok? --Ezarate 22:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC) @Ezarate: I've uploaded a version with slightly less adjustment, does that look more natural? DeFacto 10:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC) ok --Ezarate 23:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The ruins of Kenilworth Castle keep --DeFacto 22:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Comment is the perspective ok? --Ezarate 22:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      @Ezarate: I've uploaded a version with slightly less adjustment, does that look more natural? DeFacto 10:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC) ok --Ezarate 23:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination The ruins of Kenilworth Castle Great Hall --DeFacto 22:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination The ruins of Kenilworth Castle Great Hall --DeFacto 22:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Maria Helpful Church in the Wunderburg in Bamberg --Ermell 19:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. The resolution could be better. --XRay 06:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Maria Helpful Church in the Wunderburg in Bamberg --Ermell 19:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. The resolution could be better. --XRay 06:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Hiking guidepost in Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion The part with the sunspot seems a little overexposed, do you think you could tone it down a bit and bring out some more detail in that area? W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Just what you said: things you oversee in your own pictures. Thank you! --Basotxerri 08:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Perfect! Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Hiking guidepost in Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion The part with the sunspot seems a little overexposed, do you think you could tone it down a bit and bring out some more detail in that area? W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Just what you said: things you oversee in your own pictures. Thank you! --Basotxerri 08:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
      Perfect! Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Landscape in Álava, summit of Oketa, beeches and ferns. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion The sun glints on the leaves in trees (not the ferns) are a little disturbing. Think you could tone them down a bit? Love the misty mountain in the distance. W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)  Done This was good example to learn to use the adjustment brush in Lightroom. Thank you! --Basotxerri 08:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC) It's the little details that does it. Very nice now. Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Landscape in Álava, summit of Oketa, beeches and ferns. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion The sun glints on the leaves in trees (not the ferns) are a little disturbing. Think you could tone them down a bit? Love the misty mountain in the distance. W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      ✓ Done This was good example to learn to use the adjustment brush in Lightroom. Thank you! --Basotxerri 08:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
      It's the little details that does it. Very nice now. Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Landscape in Álava, summit of Anboto, beeches. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Very nice, but the lower right corner with the dark part of the trees and the stone needs a bit of noise reduction. W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)  Done You make me work! However you're absolutely right as the image hadn't had any NR at all. Good observation! --Basotxerri 08:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC) We all work hard to get our pics to look their best. Good quality and excellent striking composition. I would support this if I happened to see it at FPC. (That is why I checked even more thoroughly.) ;) --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Landscape in Álava, summit of Anboto, beeches. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Very nice, but the lower right corner with the dark part of the trees and the stone needs a bit of noise reduction. W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      ✓ Done You make me work! However you're absolutely right as the image hadn't had any NR at all. Good observation! --Basotxerri 08:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
      We all work hard to get our pics to look their best. Good quality and excellent striking composition. I would support this if I happened to see it at FPC. (That is why I checked even more thoroughly.) ;) --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 6 Franka Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 07:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Withdrawn  I withdraw my nomination--Aeou 09:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Комплекс Києво-Печерської лаври (Національний заповідник Києво-Печерська Лавра), Київ, Лаврська вул., 9, 15 --Мирослав Видрак 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 12:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Комплекс Києво-Печерської лаври (Національний заповідник Києво-Печерська Лавра), Київ, Лаврська вул., 9, 15 --Мирослав Видрак 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 12:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Two stacks of silage bales. --W.carter 23:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion There is the presence of some noise, especially on the left bales, perhaps you could try to a bit of addional NR. By the way, I think that this can get better if you lower the highlights and brighten the shadows a bit (as a suggestion). --Basotxerri 16:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks!! You were absolutely right. New version uploaded. Better? Sometimes I think I'm partially blind when it comes to my own photos, missing things I would easily spot in others'. ;) That's why these reviews are so great, you get a second pair of fresh eyes. Much appreciated! W.carter 20:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Better! And good quality. --Basotxerri 09:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Two stacks of silage bales. --W.carter 23:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion There is the presence of some noise, especially on the left bales, perhaps you could try to a bit of addional NR. By the way, I think that this can get better if you lower the highlights and brighten the shadows a bit (as a suggestion). --Basotxerri 16:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      Thanks!! You were absolutely right. New version uploaded. Better? Sometimes I think I'm partially blind when it comes to my own photos, missing things I would easily spot in others'. ;) That's why these reviews are so great, you get a second pair of fresh eyes. Much appreciated! W.carter 20:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      Better! And good quality. --Basotxerri 09:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination 31 Lychakivska Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 19:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC) * Withdrawn Picture is upsampled (more pixels than a Nikon D5100 provide), this is full no-go for me, sorry --A.Savin 00:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC) It was not upsampling. Added template {{Panorama}}. It was made of two photos.--Aeou 12:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC) I disagree, it is panorama of good quality --Мирослав Видрак 18:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination Not sharp.--Aeou 22:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Timoleague Friary: Window of main church --Imehling 14:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Just there. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Timoleague Friary: Window of main church --Imehling 14:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Just there. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination I think is good qualiti of spider flower cultivar picture --AfroBrazilian 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion I don't. It's overexposed and has too many distracting unsharp areas. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination I think is good qualiti of spider flower cultivar picture --AfroBrazilian 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion I don't. It's overexposed and has too many distracting unsharp areas. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Костел монастиря бернардинів (Троїцький кафедральний собор)(мур.), Луцьк, вул. Л. Українки, 60 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Handles the contrast just well enough. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Костел монастиря бернардинів (Троїцький кафедральний собор)(мур.), Луцьк, вул. Л. Українки, 60 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Handles the contrast just well enough. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Вежа (мур.), Белз, пл.Л.Українки --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good detail. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination церква Преображенська, Львів, Краківська, 21 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC) * Decline Nice view and color, but ultimately too noisy. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination церква Преображенська, Львів, Краківська, 21 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Decline Nice view and color, but ultimately too noisy. Daniel Case 02:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Marianne Road, Bialskie Mountans, Sudetes 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Marianne Road, Bialskie Mountans, Sudetes 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Moskauer Vorort in Riga, Lettland --Ralf Roletschek 10:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Moskauer Vorort in Riga, Lettland --Ralf Roletschek 10:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Saint Cecilia stained glass window in All Saints church, Preston Bagot --DeFacto 20:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion There is some slight green and blue/purple CA in several places in the window. Think you can remove that? W.carter 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC) @W.carter: newly adjusted version uploaded. I think the lens CAs are minimal but the old rough glass does transmit a bluey turquoise light too. Please see what you make of it now. DeFacto 21:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. This one is ok now. --W.carter 08:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Saint Cecilia stained glass window in All Saints church, Preston Bagot --DeFacto 20:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion There is some slight green and blue/purple CA in several places in the window. Think you can remove that? W.carter 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
      @W.carter: newly adjusted version uploaded. I think the lens CAs are minimal but the old rough glass does transmit a bluey turquoise light too. Please see what you make of it now. DeFacto 21:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      Good quality. This one is ok now. --W.carter 08:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Tomba di Crespi-Provasoli, Busto Arsizio --Yiyi 17:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC) It needs a vertical perspective correction along with a reduction of CA Poco a poco 19:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC) * * Review needed
    • Nomination: Tomba di Crespi-Provasoli, Busto Arsizio --Yiyi 17:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
      It needs a vertical perspective correction along with a reduction of CA Poco a poco 19:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Review needed
  • * Nomination Landsort kapell (chapell) . --ArildV 13:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Good but tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 13:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you --ArildV 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Landsort kapell (chapell) . --ArildV 13:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
      Good but tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 13:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you --ArildV 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Ringlokschuppen in Siegen --Wikimatze 12:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC) * Review  Comment Perspective should be corrected. Is a bit dark IMO--Ermell 13:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Ringlokschuppen in Siegen --Wikimatze 12:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Review  Comment Perspective should be corrected. Is a bit dark IMO--Ermell 13:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination: Eglwys Saint Sadwrn Henllan. Gradd: II*.Cymraeg: Grade: II* Church of St Sadwrn. Village of Henllan, Denbighshire. --Llywelyn2000 07:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC) * Review Sharpness is good, CAs at the left side are fixable. But the monument at the left side is unfortunate cropped. Maybe the lines of tower are not in fact vertical, but the monument and tombs indicate that perspective correction is needed. And this correction will additionally worsen the composition.--Aeou 17:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Eglwys Saint Sadwrn Henllan. Gradd: II*.Cymraeg: Grade: II* Church of St Sadwrn. Village of Henllan, Denbighshire. --Llywelyn2000 07:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Review Sharpness is good, CAs at the left side are fixable. But the monument at the left side is unfortunate cropped. Maybe the lines of tower are not in fact vertical, but the monument and tombs indicate that perspective correction is needed. And this correction will additionally worsen the composition.--Aeou 17:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  • * Nomination Burg Rabeneck über der Wiesent bei Waischenfeld --Ermell 12:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC) * Promotion At first I thought it was an old B&W photo, but once I opened it on full size...WOW! There is some red CA in the tree to the right that should be removed though, and some noise reduction in the sky and the water would be very welcome. W.carter 22:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Done New and hopefully better version. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 19:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Nomination Burg Rabeneck über der Wiesent bei Waischenfeld --Ermell 12:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Promotion At first I thought it was an old B&W photo, but once I opened it on full size...WOW! There is some red CA in the tree to the right that should be removed though, and some noise reduction in the sky and the water would be very welcome. W.carter 22:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)✓ Done New and hopefully better version. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 19:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      Good quality. --W.carter 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Consensual review edit

File:16-09-17-WlC-Kornwestheim-Img0353.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Blame it on the Beet, Cocktail --Ralf Roletschek 22:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Freddy2001 20:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Needs appropriate category though --A.Savin 14:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment And a meaningful filename, too. --Code 17:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Yes please, a better name. Many of your pictures have really strange file names, relating more to your own sorting system I suppose, than search engine friendly words used at Commons. W.carter 08:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   I withdraw my nomination I make no competition with Quality Filename Candidates. --Ralf Roleček 19:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 20:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Ornamental pool in Jameos del Agua.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Exterior lake in Jameos del Agua. Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain. --ElBute 10:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Lake? This looks more like a "lake-shaped" pool to me. W.carter 11:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • {{o}} Sorry, Insufficient quality. far away from beeing a QI, IMO --Hubertl 11:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC) **   Comment Yes, it's an artificial lake or a pool not intended for bathing
    •   Comment Hubertl Could you please be a bit more specific? What are the so obvious reasons for your rejection? --ElBute 12:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
      •   Comment I appreciate more opinions. --Hubertl 13:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
        •   Comment - I think the issue for me is one of definition. In English, we would not call this a lake. I would call it a pool, and since it's not intended for swimming, I suppose an "ornamental pool", though that isn't a common term. As for the picture's quality, the focus looks OK to me except for a bit of unsharpness in the upper half of the area near the right margin, but overall, it looks good enough for QI to me. So my advice, for what it's worth, would be: (1) Change the filename from "Lake in Jameos del Agua" to "Pool in Jameos del Agua", and also change the English-language description accordingly Once you do that, for whatever it's worth, I would vote to support this as a QI, although I would like to know whether there's something Hubertl saw that I'm missing. -- Ikan Kekek 00:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment for me this picture lacks on details on the dark parts. --Hubertl 06:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • You're absolutely right. I was focusing too much on the pool itself, I think.   Oppose per Hubertl. -- Ikan Kekek 06:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Done OK, at least now I have a reason for rejection. It doesn't help when your picture is rejected with no reason at all. Well, shadows have been lightened up. Now, there is more detail in there. Regarding the description, it has been updated to "ornamental pool". I do my best with the English but I'm not a native speaker, you know. In any case, nothing that could not be fixed. BTW, changing the file name is not something I can do, right? How could I ask for a filename change? Sorry, I'm not very skilled in Commons as well, but I try to learn every day. --ElBute 08:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support File name changed. You click on the "More" tab at the top of the file's page and then on "Move" and request the renaming of the file. Someone with move-rights will do the move for you. In this case I did it for you. I also added a category, Category:Ornamental pools in Spain, the expression is very much in use on Commons at least. With the shadows lifted I think it's ok. W.carter 08:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thanks W.carter for the explanation and support. --ElBute 09:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support - This is now good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Changed to   Neutral. --Hubertl 21:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 20:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:16-08-31-Saeima-RR2_3894.jpg edit

 

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 10:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mausolée_de_C._Marius_Romanus_03.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Marius Romanus Mausoleum in Kairouan --IssamBarhoumi 22:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Not a bad photo but it needs a much better description. W.carter 10:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Poor composition IMO. Overexposed areas--Lmbuga 21:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment dear W.carter I added some information but there is a lack of historical data It take me a lot of research to find the site and photograph it for wiki loves monuments this is the first free photo for the Mausoleum. dear Lmbuga there i only that building there you can verify by the location I added it in the photo details.--
      •   Comment The description is good enough now, but please remember to sign your comments! I can't se any overexposed areas except for the sun, but that is unavoidable, and the sun is not even posterized, something that I find remarkable. The composition is not poor, but rather bold and striking. Let's discuss this one.--W.carter 13:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support per above. W.carter 08:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support per W.carter. I find it striking and touching, too. IssamBarhoumi, I hope you are not looking directly at the sun while you take pictures! -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Remarkable quality for a shot against the sun. --Palauenc05 09:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

  Comment Dear Ikan Kekek yes I do ;) Dear Palauenc05 Dear W.carter Dear W.carter thank you for your advises and support :)

  • And once again IssamBarhoumi, please remember to sign you comments and posts! If you don't they can be removed. W.carter 08:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  Comment - I hope you mean you don't. If you're looking directly at the sun, please stop. You probably know this, but unless you use very special equipment, you will blind yourself if you look directly at the sun. -- Ikan Kekek 06:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Great_Sphinx_of_Giza_(1).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Great Sphinx of Giza --Hamerani 09:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment While the photo is sharp and all, you have the same problem that most photographers have when taking pics of the sphinx from this angle: There is a huge pyramid behind it and those are pretty hard to move. Some have opted for cloning it out, but I think it has a good documentary value to keep it in the picture. Only, I think it would be better if you could darken the pyramid just a little bit so that it doesn't blend in as much with the sphinx as it does right now. We need something to separate the two here. Think you can do that? W.carter 21:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support The suggested changes are   Not done but are not strictly necessary for promotion IMO. This is a case where the composition could be better, but isn't bad by any means. --King of Hearts 04:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support - W.carter's suggestion is a good one, but that's provided you want to make the picture look different from how it probably looked when you took the photo. I agree that the pyramid blends in with the sphinx somewhat, but the texture is different enough to distinguish them. I think this is good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:2016R1535_-_Київ.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Собор Софійський, Київ, Володимирська вул., 24 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Unsuitable crop, IMO. --Peulle 08:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Maybe a composition choice. Should be discussed IMO.--Jebulon 09:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I find the crop bold and interesting, focusing on the smaller towers instead if the whole building. W.carter 10:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Same as W.carter --Moroder 18:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 08:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine composition. --Palauenc05 09:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support good crop and composition. --Ralf Roletschek 19:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Spire of Sint-Bonifatiuskerk, Leeuwarden 1643.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The spire of Sint-Bonifatiuskerk, Leeuwarden. --C messier 11:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Something wrong with focus, does not appear like QI for me --A.Savin 10:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment Focus wasn't spot on, but still it was good enough.   New version with some changes, please discuss. --C messier 13:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I made sure that I was looking at both versions and even cleared my cache to make doubly sure. Even in the new version, nothing is crisp sharp, and the top of the spire is quite fuzzy. I may be wrong, but it doesn't seem like a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support I think sharpness is good enough for QI --Imehling 12:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Unsharp, but QI if you resize the picture at 2 megapixels--Lmbuga 21:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Question - Is there an unofficial QIC policy that all images larger than 2 MP should be reduced to 2 MP before the sharpness is judged, or is that only your method for judging whether the focus is sufficient for you? I'm confused by your argument, because Commons:Image guidelines specifically says: "Images should not be downsampled (sized down in order to appear of better quality). Downsampling reduces the amount of information stored in the image file." And in the section covering focus and depth of field, no comments are made about going easier on larger files or judging downsampled 2-MP versions of them instead of the files themselves. I would agree that a really tiny area of unsharpness in an otherwise crisp 40 MP image shouldn't be a bar to QI - nor in most cases to FP - but I could use a little help (rather than invective or generalized complaining) in understanding the unofficial standards that are used at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 10:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Actually, the quality should be evaluated based merely on the uploaded size. Anything else is too complicated anyway and a bias towards high-resolution cameras (a 50 mpix picture downsampled to 2 mpix is of course nearly always "sharp", but not necessarily a technically good shot; QIC should be about a good focus, exposure, and postprocess; not about certain cameras). --A.Savin 20:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
I don't completely agree with A.Savin here. The guidelines say that an image should not be downsampled in order to appear of better quality. Therefore, if camera can shoot 24 MP, one should not reduce this to 3 MP in order to make it look sharper. If that has been done, it's a disqualifier in itself. As technology developes, the standards also change; an image that was considered QI 8 years ago might not be considered good enough if uploaded today.--Peulle 21:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Possibly you misunderstood? I didn't say that downsampling is in itself a reason to decline; some downsampling is OK for me if necessary (sometimes it is); what I mean is that an image uploaded at 24 mpix should be judged based on what you see at 100% of a 24 mpix image, and not on what you see when downsampled to 2 (or 4, or 11, ...) mpix. With other words, when you shoot an unsharp 24 mpix photo, you may upload it downsampled to 2 mpix and then nominate on QIC if you think that it looks sharp enough then; but you may not nominate the full 24 mpix version and claim on QIC "well, just look at it in downsampled preview". At least with me, this wouldn't work. Lmbuga and others may think different, we have no such policy afaik. --A.Savin 23:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing this. Much appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek 00:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Just to clarify: the rules open up for downsampling if neccessary, but not if the objective is to make an unsharp image appear sharp.--Peulle 15:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support The argument on how to review is a bit complicated. We can't encourage excessive downsampling as our minimum threshold is only 2MP. At the same time a very large file sharp only in 2/3 MP is also not acceptable. So I prefer a middle ground. For larger files above 6MP (excluding stitched panoramas), if they are not sharp enough in their full resolution, I will check them again in a reasonable resolution. Here this is first uploaded in almost camera's maximum resolution; most APC/MFTs are not that much good enough. It's acceptable for me in this size. Jkadavoor 13:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 19:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Evening light into Kobbskaret in Sørfold.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Evening light into Kobbskaret in Sørfold, Norway --Frankemann 19:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)--
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality --Halavar 20:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - I disagree. Beautiful photo, but there are large posterized bright areas in the sky. Ikan Kekek 05:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I would appreciate another opinion. Should this be considered a QI because of its excellence aside from the posterized areas, or should the technical problem rule that out? -- Ikan Kekek 04:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO the problems are not serious enough to decline. --Palauenc05 09:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment - If no-one disagrees, I'm content to declare this a QI. I'll check back tomorrow and see if there are any more comments. If not, I will drop my initial opposition. -- Ikan Kekek 09:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment - I have annulled my initial oppose vote, which was mainly for the purpose of discussion. I am declaring this promoted. -- Ikan Kekek 23:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please vote pro or contra, Ikan Kekek, it is not really difficult - but difficult for me to understand, what you mean. Who else will decide, what you mean? --Hubertl 04:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment - If I knew how, I would simply promote the photo. I've annulled my oppose vote. I was being neutral, but I will mildly   Support. -- Ikan Kekek 06:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Thanks, with this, you made my life a little bit easier! --Hubertl 07:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 16:53, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_September_20_2016&oldid=524686885"