Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 23 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Статуя_Китайца_Большой_Китайский_мост_03.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Sculpture on the Chinese bridge. Pushkin, Russia --Максим Хлопов 21:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 16:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Tilted ccw. Also, where is the umbrella? - It is a very unfortunate crop on top. --Cccefalon 20:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Cccefalon is right, the crop is a killer. Denis Barthel 02:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 05:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Heilig-Geist-Kirche,_Werder_(Havel),_150912,_ako.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Interior view of the Heilig-Geist-Kirche Werder (Havel). --Code 19:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Hubertl 22:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I wish a discussion about the HDR/color/contrast issues I feel here. The lighting is not a sufficient explanation for the differences between the colors of the wooden parts. "Brown light" at left, "brown dark" at right does not work for me, despite all the other qualities of this image, sorry. A third opinion should be interesting--Jebulon 11:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Jebulon, this is quite clearly the results of shadows, as pointed out before. If you look at the carpet, it becomes clear that the sun is coming from the right side and illuminates the left side directly, while the right side is only illuminated by the reflections. I would guess that the effect is pronounced by some coating on the wood or so. This might be less than ideal (and an acceptable concern for FPC), but imho it is very harsh to deny QI for such a thing, especially given the strong quality of the rest of the image. Also this is soo common in photos of buildings outside, just look at this generic image. Nobody doubts that this is one color of grey, just once in sunlight and once in shadows... --DXR 06:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
    • DXR, I agree. No drama. I play the game of the QI process. There is no other way to have a discussion than to put the image in... "Discuss", Consensual Review. If I've not had "opposed", I would not have any other answer nor comment. I was pretty sure that this excellent image would be promotted, I just noticed something disturbing (to me), and asked for a third opinion. I've got it now, and all is fine. Thanks for answer and comment.--Jebulon 09:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
      • Okay, thanks for clarification. I get your point about "no discussion without oppose". --DXR 21:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose 8 days....the colors are strange for me --Livioandronico2013 18:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support OK for me, not oversaturated. --C messier 18:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 05:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Церковь_Никольская_деревянная_деревянная.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination St. Nicholas Church (wooden) of s. Zarucheve (d. High Island) Okulovsky District: Vitoslavlitsy, p. 16, Veliky Novgorod, Novgorod Oblast --Максим Хлопов 10:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 08:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Loss of fine details, magenta fringes and artefacts. --Cccefalon 09:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose ru: Рад бы поддержать фотографии своей страны, но на фото видно, что верхушки зданий «заваливаются», да и Cccefalon прав насчёт артефактов. en: I want to support the photo from my country, but the photo shows that the tops of church are “fall” and I agree with Cccefalon about artefacts. --Brateevsky 14:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 05:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Деревянная_Церковь_Успения_01.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Church of the Assumption (wood) from the village. Kuritsko Novgorod region: Vitoslavlitsy, p. 6, Veliky Novgorod, Novgorod Oblast --Максим Хлопов 10:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 08:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Magenta fringes, perspective not done, loss of details (probably due to over-denoising), colour noise in the sky. --Cccefalon 09:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 05:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Часовня_Кирика_и_Иулиты_купол.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Chapel Kirik and Iulity from the village. Malovishersky Kashira district: Vitoslavlitsy, p. 9, Veliky Novgorod, Novgorod Oblast --Максим Хлопов 10:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 08:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Oversharpened, slight artefacts and magenta fringes. --Cccefalon 09:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable IMO.--Jebulon 20:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 05:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:20140619_Zamek_w_Mirowie_3806.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Mirów Castle --Jakubhal 22:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Support--Jebulon 23:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: First, the chromatic aberratiobns have to be removed. --Cccefalon 07:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I have removed CAs wherever I could find them. If you see some more, please mark them with notes. --Jakubhal 08:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
    Another version uploaded. --Jakubhal 19:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Berthold Werner 06:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable now. @Jakub: Which lens was used? Exif does not provide information about model and make. -- Smial 09:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Sigma 17-70mm F/2.8-4 DC --Jakubhal 18:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Thx! -- Smial 19:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 05:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:2014_Prowincja_Armawir,_Zwartnoc,_Ruiny_katedry_Zwartnoc_04.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Column. Ruins of the Zvartnots Cathedral. Zvartnots, Armavir Province, Armenia. --Halavar 07:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Cayambe 16:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry to disagree, the composition is really wrong: not enough space right and left, too much sky above. A third opinion, or a rework, is needed, please.--Jebulon 21:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Depicts the object in a reasonable manner. -- Smial 10:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   weak would prefer a closer crop at the top. --Hubertl 05:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 05:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)