Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 26 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Lysice (Lissitz) - zámek (by Pudelek) 5.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Castle in Lysice (Lissitz), Moravia --Pudelek 10:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  • {{o}} Bad crop (see upper right corner). Columns of the left are tilted--Lmbuga 11:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I cropped this photo --Pudelek 08:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks. Good quality--Lmbuga 12:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment Sorry, but I can not understand what appears to be a review. Please, more seriously--Lmbuga 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 07:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Yasmine_Larsson.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Yasmine Larsson. By User:Esquilo --Josve05a 12:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 12:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I disagree: In my opinion, the eyepart is not sharp enough for a portrait photo. far too shallow DoF with f2,2 for a face pic. There is also an unresolved redlink (fixable) --Cccefalon 13:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Wow! First time someone else has promoted one of my photos. Of course I support. :-) I'we fixed the red link, added a better description and made some minor improvements to the image. At this distance (5 feet) the DoF is 3 inch. Should be more than enough to cover the whole face, but not her throat. --Esquilo 07:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
It is better now. But as editor of the photo, you cannot vote, sorry. However, to value your efforts, I revoke my oppose. --Cccefalon 10:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I find the first version better. The skin is not natural anymore. There were more details visible and they are removed now. Some unattractive thinks intentionally. Maybe that works for promotional photos but not here in my opinion. --Hockei 18:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unnatural.--Jebulon 20:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I've uploaded a new version. Same edits, but a bit more conservative- --Esquilo 21:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Not fixed in my eyes. Still the same. --Hockei 15:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
If it was my nomination, I would revoke it. It is more important to me to be satisfied with my work than to get a QI-stamp on it. And I am not satisfied with the original photo. --Esquilo 07:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 12:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)