Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 28 2015

Consensual review edit

File:AT_13527_Kath._Pfarrkirche_hl._Johannes_Evangelist_und_Friedhof,_Wenns-8254.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Panoramic view of Wenns, Tyrol --Hubertl 07:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
    I disagree: Right side is leaning in considerably. Elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 07:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC) *   Comment   Done thanks in advance for additional reviewing, Uwe --Hubertl 12:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks, it is good now. I think, it can be speedily promoted, as you fixed it immediately. I had set it back to promotion already yesterday, but I wasn't at the keys the whole day. --Cccefalon 06:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Cccefalon 06:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Vodní nádrž Letovice (by Pudelek).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Letovice Dam, Moravia --Pudelek 10:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose looks like a standard holiday picture with the family --Elrond 20:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support no problem with families in QI-images. --Hubertl 08:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Nevertheless it is IMHO only a nice holiday picture and no QI-image --Elrond 09:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
      Comment Schau dir die Regeln für QI an. Es geht nicht um Geschmacksfragen. Nicht die Familie steht in der Diskussion, sondern der sich aus der Anwesenheit der Personen sich ergebende dokumentarische Inhalt, dass es (auch - und offensichtlich) ein Badesee ist. --Hubertl 09:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
      Comment was macht denn dieses Bid zu einem QI? --Elrond 12:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
  Comment Unter anderem, dass es - anders als die Mengen an unscharfem Müll, der hier neuerdings abgeladen wird - eine ausreichende Schärfe hat, keine chromatischen Aberrationen hat und der Weissabgleich ordentlich ist. --Cccefalon 12:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
  Comment also scharf und farbrein. Motiv ist egal. Danke für die Aufklärung. Das erklärt meine Frage vollumfänglich. --Elrond 19:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC
  • Zu dem Stausee gibt es auch Artikel. Die sind jetzt bebildert. Badesee ohne badende Menschen wäre irgendwie blöd. --Ralf Roletschek 10:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Commentthis is picture of the dam from holidays ;) --Pudelek 13:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support as Hubertl. --Ralf Roletschek 08:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Borobudur-Temple-Park_Indonesia_Reliefs-of-Borobudur-01.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Borobudur temple Park, Indonesia: Borobudur reliefs in Borobudur Temple Park. --Cccefalon 06:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality -- Spurzem 09:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Has barrel distortion, not sharp in corners. Denis Barthel 15:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
    *::  Done removed bd, thanks for the hint. --Cccefalon 17:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support OK --Rjcastillo 20:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Dolphin-tour.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sea tour by the boat in Sochi --Sergei Kazantsev 19:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: It is totally blurred and has other issues like fringes. --Cccefalon 07:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with Cccefalon. Bad quality --Rjcastillo 20:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 15:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Grave cross of Piotr Ivanovich Zinoview.jpg edit

 

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 08:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]