Commons:Valued image candidates/(MHNT) Ficaria verna - flower.jpg

(MHNT) Ficaria verna - flower.jpg

**undecided**
Image
Nominated by	Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-04-05 05:09 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Ficaria verna (lesser celandine) flower
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Comment Ficaria verna appears to be very popular among photographers as there are 252 Ficaria verna flower images in Commons. While some should be better classified as inflorescence or have multiple flowers, there are many similar to this one. This alternative has much better color and lighting and should be considered more valuable. Open to your thoughts on this. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Comment Please check your link. It's not working for me. However, your alternative is not on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Comment Have enclosed a couple of alternates : 2022-03-21 16 31 24 Lesser Celandine flower along a forested walking path in the Franklin Glen section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg and 20190324 Ficaria verna 2.jpgin nom linked category that have better color and lighting. There are others. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Question Why don't you oppose, then? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Comment Archaeodontosaurus is quite experienced in VI. I just wanted to give him the opportunity to comment if there was something I was missing in his nomination. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Comment There are 250+ to choose from. It's too difficult. This appears to be a focus stack (errors are OK for VI) Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] Oppose as at least two alternates mentioned above, have better color and lighting. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 1 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2022 (UTC)`[reply]