Commons:Valued image candidates/05june-dow7-wide.ogv

05june-dow7-wide.ogv

**declined**
Image
Nominated by	Ks0stm (talk) on 2010-01-29 22:36 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Radar images of severe thunderstorms
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Not a reason, but: Info For an explanation of the image, see the file's description page. -- Ks0stm (talk)
Review (criteria)	~~Oppose~~ Videos are not within the scope of the VI process. (Commons:Valued image criteria, the very end of the page) --MattiPaavola (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] I stroke my oppose since KS0stm correctly pointed out that "animations" are documented to be allowed here: Commons:Valued_images#Eligibility. I'm puzzled. Could someone more familiar with the VI project's history elaborate the intention a little more. Is there a particular reason why "animations" are allowed while "videos" are not? What is the exact difference between an animation and a video? I guess this nominated thing would be a video not an animation since this is measured data, not something someone just draw, but that is just my interpretation of the difference between video and animation. Opinions? Cheers, --MattiPaavola (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] Info Good question. I've written a lengthy post regarding this on the project talk page. --Slaunger (talk) 21:59, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Media difficult to see, this is not an image.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. --Slaunger (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)`[reply]