Reviews are invited from those who realise that the standard is that of a reasonably competent photographer rather than an unreasonably competent photographer. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)
Comment I take it from this comment that you are self-identifying as an "unreasonably competent photographer", otherwise, of course, you would just have ignored it and moved on, as would have any sensible person. As for "reasonably competent", I have 417 quality images. That's not bad. I've already pointed out to you that you have never, ever supported any of my VI or QI nominations, only objected. I suspect a bias here that goes way beyond a collegiate, professional and practical attitude. I do *my* best. It's not *your* best obviously, but we are not talking about perfection here, we are talking about value. Lend me your equipment, budget and experience, and I'll match you. Until then, if you feel unjustly treated, either criticise my work properly, or take it to ANI. You've already made my work here less than happy, and I've already invited you to not comment on my nominations. That's an invitation you should have accepted, and gracefully. It's time to make that decision for once and for all. RHE out. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
