Question Why ? I think it is especially proper in this case ! We are here right in the middle of the target of the VI project, IMO. Three "featured pictures" of the same subject from the same point of view is an exceptional scope, never seen here until today.--Jebulon (talk) 21:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Featured Pictures of Neuschwanstein as seen from Marienbrücke" is the intersection of two things: "Neuschwanstein as seen from Marienbrücke" and "Featured Pictures". "Neuschwanstein as seen from Marienbrücke" is a suitable scope because the castle looks a certain way from that angle and can be generally identified as such from the photo itself. "Featured Pictures", however, is not a suitable scope element because it can never be identified from the photo itself. Per Commons:Valued image scope, "There should be something visible in the nominated image which links it specifically in some way with the chosen scope. So for example "storm clouds over London" would not be acceptable unless there were buildings or other features visible which could distinguish it from, say, "storm clouds over Sydney" or "storm clouds over Tokyo"." In this case, there is no way, looking only at a photo itself, to determine whether it is a Featured Picture of Neuschwanstein as seen from Marienbrücke or a non-featured picture of the same scene. It's no more appropriate than, for example, using "User:Cmadler's photos of the Ypsilanti Water Tower" as a scope. cmadler (talk) 03:16, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to be absolutely not convinced by your argumentation, and continuing to fully disagree with you regarding this point...--Jebulon (talk) 09:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
