Review (criteria )
Previous reviews
In de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Formatvorlage Pferderasse#Erläuterung zum Bild in der Rassebox is specified how the horse of an infobox-photo should stand for german Wikipedia. That is the Pose used for selling horses in catalogues, because it ist optimal for judging the quality of a horse.
photographed exactly from the side
Legs: The legs should which are nearer to the Photographer schold be moved front for the front leg and back for the hindleg. (Open to onlooker)
The background should be quiet an of a different color compared to the horse
The horse schould stand with head up and looking forward
The Pony on the Photo File:Pony With A Fright Wig.jpg stands the right way. --Kersti (talk ) 20:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Voting here has been closed for almost two months. If you think another candidate is more suitable, please open a most valued review with both candidates. --Eusebius (talk ) 20:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Thanks. I have made your oppose a "comment", because I think it is more fair for you not to vote, since you're nominating a competitor. I hope this is ok with you. --Eusebius (talk ) 22:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Thats okay - I simply didn't know how to do it. --Kersti (talk ) 22:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Comment I think this image is better because it has a higher resolution and looks more natural. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk ) 03:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
I think the lighting is better here, but it's true that the head is better shown on the other pic. --Eusebius (talk ) 06:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose This is indeed a close call. It has the best image quality but it is IMO not quite as good for illustrating the scope. I think Kersti has a valid point there. --Slaunger (talk ) 21:35, 19 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]
Scores:
1. Pony With A Fright Wig.jpg : +3
2. Dartmoor pony 1.jpg : -1 (current VI within same scope)
=>
File:Pony With A Fright Wig.jpg : Promoted.
File:Dartmoor pony 1.jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former.
--Eusebius (talk ) 11:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC) [ reply ]