Commons:Valued image candidates/Kloz iliz Pleiben.jpg

Kloz iliz Pleiben.jpg

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Bzh-99 (talk) on 2014-03-10 23:08 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Enclos paroissial de Pleyben
Used in	Global usage fr:Enclos paroissial de Pleyben, Enclos paroissial
Reason	Vue d'ensemble de l'enclos paroissial, avec tous ses éléments bâtis. / Overview of the parish enclosure, with its all built elements. -- Bzh-99 (talk)
Review (criteria)	Comment Very good job didactic. But perspective distortion that can be corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] How ? - Bzh-99 (talk) 10:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] Bzh-99, I've found that GIMP is a useful programme for changing perspective. It has a tool which allows you to make manual adjustments. It's worth getting some practice with it. Until then, I have straightened the image myself. How does that look? Nev1 (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] Great ! (Although these changes are almost invisible) - Bzh-99 (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] ~~Oppose~~ One scope only for one nomination. Enclos paroissial de Pleyben would be OK. Yann (talk) 06:52, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] I don't understand your vote. Can you explain to me ? - Bzh-99 (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] @Bzh-99: Deux liens vers deux catégories différentes correspond à deux scopes. Mais un seul scope est autorisé dans une nomination. Enclos paroissial serait un scope trop large de toute façon. Yann (talk) 14:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] @ Yann : Donc pourquoi voter contre ? Il suffirait d'enlever un scope, non ? - Bzh-99 (talk) 15:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] @Bzh-99: Effectivement. Habituellement, on laisse le nominateur faire ce type de modifs, en partie pour ne pas paraître partial dans le vote, en partie pour que le nominateur apprenne. ;o) Yann (talk) 17:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] OK, fait / done ! - Bzh-99 (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)`[reply]