Commons:Valued image candidates/Palma nana a Segesta.JPG

Palma nana a Segesta.JPG

promoted
Image  
Nominated by OppidumNissenae (talk) on 2013-10-15 12:52 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamaerops humilis (saw palmetto)
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)
  Comment Sorry. I'm still inexperienced, I correct him.--OppidumNissenae (talk) 18:02, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support This scope (category and sub-categories) contains 107 images. But, for mainscope, I think an image of the entire plant is appropriate. There aren't so many of those. This one has good resolution, illumination and exposure. It depicts the stems, is geocoded and has an uncluttered background, while File:Es Saulonar 02.jpg lacks those qualities. File:Chamaerops humilis (Zingaro)016.jpg does not show the fruit, is not geocoded although its location in a protected area is given, and has lower resolution. While it is a strong competitor, I support this image. Please add this image to Chamaerops humilis. In the scope, you don't need the "A" and I don't think the link of saw palmetto to category:Palms in Italy is helpful, so I've made those changes. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation, very useful to understand. The category: Palms in Italy 's choice because it is a common plant in gardens and flower beds in Southern Italy; but I'm learning, it is not easy to understand the logic at the beginning.--OppidumNissenae (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
When an image is promoted, the scope becomes the caption in the VI gallery, e.g., Commons:Valued_images_by_topic/Life_forms#Flowering_plants_.28Magnoliophyta.29. The practice is to not link the common names. Please add this image to the gallery Chamaerops humilis. If you specify the gallery page in the scope, VICbot will annotate the image in the gallery.[1] I've changed the scope to Chamaerops humilis. Please refer to Commons:Valued_image_scope#Plants.--Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:05, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:47, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
[reply]