Commons:Valued image candidates/Peacearch-usside.jpg

Peacearch-usside.jpg

**declined**
Image
Nominated by	Ikar.us (talk) on 2010-07-07 22:53 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Peace Arch Park
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Shows the arch, the custom station and elements of the park. -- Ikar.us (talk)
Review (criteria)	Support (the prespective to be corrected) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Question Are the edges of the arch vertical? --Ikar.us (talk) 20:32, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Comment For VI this is not a problem. But there is much distortion of perspective. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] File:Peace-Arch-3614.jpg is a view from above, but it looks narrower at the top. It seems to be really tapered. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Oppose I don't know this place. To me, it shows an arch, not a park enough. The scope is bad IMO. I suggest "The arch of the peace arch park". (Furthermore, to be clear for non northern-american people, maybe could you correct "costum" in "custom" )--Jebulon (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] I didn't know it before. VI is very educative. We see lots of lawn, people walking, a florid flag and the sign with the name of the park (not readable, but visible). Only a border marker is missing. Done orthography. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:35, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] PS. For the arch only, I'd prefer File:Peacearchuscanadaborder.JPG, where the inside is better visible. --Ikar.us (talk) 15:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Comment Considering Jebulon's remarks, I've nominated a new candidate. --Myrabella (talk) 23:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Peace Arch.JPG: -2 2. Peacearch-usside.jpg: 0 <-- 3. Peace-Arch-3614 edit.jpg: +1 => File:Peace Arch.JPG: Declined. File:Peacearch-usside.jpg: Declined. <-- File:Peace-Arch-3614 edit.jpg: Promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]