Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Comment Thanks to remind us this previous review of another image of the category. Nevertheless, I argue that this specific rose deserves a scope. VI rules say for buildings scopes :"Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest". I think it is the case here. The three roses of Notre-Dame de Paris can be considered as masterpieces of gothic stained glass windows. Someone interested in gothic art and architecture is able to identify each one at first glance because each one show different and significant aspects; moreover, the north rose, dating from 13th century, retains much more original glass and design than the two others, much restored. In a recent previous review, we finally promoted a specific portal of of San Marco Basilica in Venice for the same kind of reason, cf. that review. --Myrabella (talk) 09:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support a VI set for all three rose windows of Notre-Dame (and not for every single gothic cathedral of course), but not for this single one, sorry, I really think the scope is too narrow (as always with scope broadth, it is rather subjective an evaluation). The restoration of the other rose windows does not make them less significant for me (the three windows are very famous, and I'd like to point out that each one only gets a few lines in the French article, although the reference for a VI scope is often a dedicated article). Do we have the material for a VI set with the three ones? --Eusebius (talk) 09:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please ping me if such a VIS is proposed. I'm not very active anymore here, but I'd like to evaluate such a scope. I'm afraid I'll maintain my opposition on this one. --Eusebius (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your sugggestion. If you had taken the time to read this (long) review, you would have noticed that the discussion is now about a possible VI set, so the image you propose might be considered if someone decided to set up such a set some day. I have already indicated that personally, I prefer the "Chagler's version" to the derivated work you dispay because in "GothicRayonnant" version, the enhancement of colors has "burnt" a lot of details. --Myrabella (talk) 06:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
