Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Valued image candidates/Schubboot Victor Millet,F.JPG

< Commons:Valued image candidates

Schubboot Victor Millet,F.JPG

declined
Image  
Nominated by Ikar.us (talk) on 2010-06-22 07:52 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pusher boats
Used in Global usage
Reason Better background. (i.e. unremarkable - therefore I claim exception from geocoding, the movable ship is the only important object in the image) -- Ikar.us (talk)
Review
(criteria)

This is an example for a Rhine ship, which is not limited in height, like those on Seine or Havel. --Ikar.us (talk) 08:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC) *  Oppose (may I, as nominator of a competitor ?) Sorry, I disagree with your claim exception from geocoding, furthermore, I don't understand your argument about height limitation to make this one more representative...--Jebulon (talk) 10:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think you may. (Voting rules are anyway inconsistent.) This isn't an argument, just a remark that there are many different kinds of barges. (I would like scopes for all of them.) (There's no description field in Template:VIC.) --Ikar.us (talk) 10:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    •   Info VI voting rules aren't so inconsistent: "Any registered user can review the valued image candidates [...]. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it)." => the first nominator can vote, if he isn't the author of the competing images. However, some consider as more "fair play" or sportive not to, when their first nominated image has been put in a MVR. --Myrabella (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 16:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

MVR Scores: 
1. pousseur intraitable.jpg: 0
2. Schubverband Havel.jpg: 0  
3. Schubboot Victor Millet,F.JPG: -1 <--
4. Duwboot Kraaijenberg in sluis Maas-Waalkanaal, heumen (Gld, NL).JPG: 0
5. ENI 02006792 JAMAICA (03).JPG: -1
6. RT tug pusher4.jpg: +2
=>
File:pousseur intraitable.jpg: Declined.
File:Schubverband Havel.jpg: Declined.
File:Schubboot Victor Millet,F.JPG: Declined. <--
File:Duwboot Kraaijenberg in sluis Maas-Waalkanaal, heumen (Gld, NL).JPG: Declined.
File:ENI 02006792 JAMAICA (03).JPG: Declined.
File:RT tug pusher4.jpg: Promoted.
--Myrabella (talk) 22:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Schubboot_Victor_Millet,F.JPG&oldid=41082872"