Open main menu

Commons talk:Photographs of identifiable people/Update 2013/Identification

  • Click on the 'Project page' tab, above to see the current policy/guideline wording that is under discussion on this page.
  • To make a specific proposal, please start a new subsection and use the code below to put it in its own box. You can sign underneath the resultant box, but for technical reasons you can't use "~~~~" within it. Please number your proposal for ease of reference.
{{divbox|amber|Proposal number and title|Introduction
*more text}}
Commons-logo.svg Scope Review 2013 links:

Discuss stage 2 of this review



Links to current rules

Discussion: Introductory Scope wording

Discussion: Files

Discussion: Pages, galleries and categories

Discussion: Areas of particular concern

Discussion: Identifiable people

Other proposals

Proposal 1Edit

  • Please discuss the above proposal here

Comment by User:Optimist on the runEdit

Does this count as "identifiable"?

I believe there should be some distinction between images that are clearly of a person or persons, and those where there are identifiable members of the public in the image, but are not the main subject. In general I do not upload photos even in the latter category - one of the exceptions is on the left. In this case I know some of the people on the train, though not all (including the children in red). As they are not the main subject of the photo, should images like these be subject to the policy?  An optimist on the run! 12:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

This topic appears to be of lesser interest/priority to the community than some of the others in this review, and I propose that we should close it down now. That will allow us in part 2 of the review to focus our full attention on the most important and/or contentious issues. Please comment at Commons talk:Project scope/Update 2013/Stage 2. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Return to the project page "Photographs of identifiable people/Update 2013/Identification".