Identifier: insuperiorcourto07cuca (find matches)
Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187
Year: 1907 (1900s)
Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co
Subjects:
Publisher: (San Bernardino?
Contributing Library: University of California Libraries
Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
e and eix-tonthn percent of tne 17 yerj ;; voraj-e.Q What do you call the real (.vera^e? A The 36 year aver^^e; Eai(.i Mie 1? year avertige ia 14.54;1.39 is nine and six-tenths percent, of 14.54; if youadd that tnach to it you srill ^^et the reul average of 15.93;and I ,:iorely applied the.t Btuts pereentr^^e to the 17 yearrr-cord of the Hareood gucge. Noif, tE.V:iri£; the other elevations above that point, 1have Ci.Jculated the 36 yoar averf^.e ra-infall for every1000 fGot, boginnin^ with 2500 feet above Gef-lovel, bas-ing it on this 3b year record of 21^.59 for the iiarwood gucgeand obtained the follo?;i:\:: rcB;lts: -^or 2500 feot elevation, 27,39 inches, which appliesfrom 2000 to 3000 foot. 3500 fof?t elPV>vtinn, 33.29 inches, waich applies from3000 to 4000 foot. 4500 fset elevation, 59,39 inches, rrhich anplies from4000 to 5000 feet. 5500 feot elevation, 45.39 inches, wnich applies from5000 to 6000 feet. 65oo feet elov;.tion, 39,39 inchos, which apjlies from6000 to 7ooo feet.
Text Appearing After Image:
.^2 >i^^S9 7t)00 foet elevation, 33.39 inches, which apDliea from7000 to 6000 feet coove eea-lebel. 6i>00 feet elovation, 27,39 inches, which applies from8000 to 9000 feet elevation, anu ist as ni^h &a the rule willpermit you to £;o. And these are the rt.inftills which have been used fortne avere^je in i.islin^ all computations of run-off from thesewatersheds; when the mean run-off has been deteriained simi-lar calculations liave been uuue as to all the watershedsunder consideration. ^ have you examinee the tabult-iion on pr^ 2513 of thereporters transcript, with reference to the Frankish anuStfitirn tuiinel?. A I have. Q what if anytuin(3 do you find in that, bearir^ U))On youropinions as to the waters in the jied hill district? A That tabulation snows thecorrectness of the tneory, orof the fc;eolo^ical determination uiade in that vicinity,that the material at the foot of the mountains is verycoarse, bein^f, in the recent foririation, overlyitig the an-cient formation, and

Note About Images