Identifier: insuperiorcourto07cuca (find matches)
Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187
Year: 1907 (1900s)
Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co
Subjects:
Publisher: (San Bernardino?
Contributing Library: University of California Libraries
Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
, it v/oula Bno* Uad, in the old fon.iationon tr;c east side, the water percolate to the fioutheast, inthe 0 posite direction from tiiat r-hich it travels in therecent iorriuition to tne vvest side. li vhat is indicated by the ch*ii^e in water (/ratie ^>iiereV ii ihe changes in water ^~;r?iue tnere are due to ti.e contactbetween tue recent alluvium, or lete quaternMry, with theearly; the water in uie recent fonuLtir.n is only surffa-cewater, which travels rarndly thfovf;;h the go-m .le iiiatcrial,while in the ancient fornitition it is arteriRH ^at-.r travel-in?/, under pressure, and a<;,ain8t marked reBiatEnace in theclay and silt fomiation rf.ich surrounus t.lJ of the veinsG&rryi:vj the water. V.0 ^^eferriu:; to plaintiffs .:<iiibit -34, vTiil you stctev/hetiier you tif.ve era: ined th.is ciagrcum, roit what il ii:di-categ with reff:rencc to the cauoes of the depletion of•nlaiiitii, s apriiie^s sue tunnelsY ii. I hsjm exfv ined thic ui^^iam, and note wiitt it incicutos
Text Appearing After Image:
aa to the causoB of the depletion of the CucajiK>nga Spring!and Y tunnel, anci oi-her east side sources. Q (Veil, state whet is your opinion? The nourt, *4 Does that Khov» the combined reaaureroentof the aprii^jB and Y tunnel? A That tiivea tl:ie coLibinad raeaaureraent of the Y tunneland Cuct. onga Sprin^ia, be^ inning with the year 18ci5, whenthe first ineasurei.ont siiown on Exhibit 32 oi tlie plaintiffsis ijiven, this bein(: prepared by the plaiiiuiffa, ohowir^the flow on the east side of the Y tunnal and the Cucainon^^^Springe, and irdicatea with the rainfall and dovelopraent ofthe Y tunnel the water of the east side increased up1B90, rhen in July it was b05.06 inchec; from that point itbo^jran to decline, and in \iy opinion up to 1894, when theniea3iue,ient of 356.29 incVies ^ms inade, ^Vi&.t decline was dueto the de7elo,;ii»nt, drainirifs the fonnation in that neigh-boriiood; from tViat point a decline ha3 coatinu&d each year,from 1894 down to the year 19f)D, and t

Note About Images