Identifier: insuperiorcourto07cuca (find matches)
Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187
Year: 1907 (1900s)
Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co
Subjects:
Publisher: (San Bernardino?
Contributing Library: University of California Libraries
Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
or 99, 30 incnep cr triftretboute; so tuat if evenall that pumper! water, wliich caine out only six months eachyear, were tak^n into coMsideration, it could not contributein any r^aterial quantity to the decline, end therefore tuestatement that they conmencec: pujiiinf, the 16th street ..ellin Au/n.iBt, 1896 is very rji^^lpadin^^, ae the mjaiitity of wa-ter pumped trap so 8fra,ll, thrj.t evpji if it vt.F. ia contact withthe other tupply it could not have affected it; but thatdecline ia due to othpr causes; enc tht rise is (lus to theincreased rainfall of the last few years.Q have you examined plaintiffs >i:ibit 35, snowing f^easurefrentB in ^^m^ktl^ weir nujaber 8? A I hve. ^ State wliat your opinion is as to the uiattcrs thown thereanc, the bpa ing upon the, ois,-prF.frr.Ticn of the Trtcrs frwBplrintiffs lands? A i^rfnubadi This exhibit .% purtorts to bo ;i£.ac frwnmeasurements ana data given in plaintiffs Exhibit nuuber 3,nnd before analyzin it I wish to coi-rre son frrlurer of
Text Appearing After Image:
J^ the two exhibits: On this erhibit wo rind rarked at .fc.rch 21, lJ(A, tu. tthe iiaii iiritonio .Vuter .^oup&,iiy is p/mf)i%;. iio-skell .veil nui.iber2, whilo xhibit number 6, on v?hich the uiat^uia ia buBed,shows tat the Sa.j Mitonio n^ter (Company was not puuioiaj:, anyol its veils on Ihut aate, and that the decline, whatoverwas cau^in^, it, ntust have been due to some other cause; norwas there a.ny pur>rpiiv-% accoruirv>. to i-.-chioit 3, until tlieotn ol July thit year. ur c^ritt: Soins exhibit, 8i>ovB that it was T)utupin^ beforehat ti--.e in T^vK.. u it oiiows .7ell 14 was purypiniii, and notr.iig^ else,-7ei.s pumpin.^; ajout the lot.in ol jebrut.rjr, ana cloeeci oei^oreitib .:lBt of arch, 1 cant f:nd aiiy evidence t :at tnerf wuriiiij oohar puiirpi,:^; on the bth of July, wher it isi statedtnat Ui9 ban Antonio .ater viompa.i/ be^^nn --juriipiijis viell nuiribrr6, that exaioit 3 sno^^s t; at to b;^ a fact, but )i0t the sttt--.!H5nt in ie«.-,aru to the iiaakeli \

Note About Images