Identifier: insuperiorcourto03cuca (find matches)
Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187
Year: 1907 (1900s)
Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co
Subjects:
Publisher: (San Bernardino?
Contributing Library: University of California Libraries
Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
:v\*iB t6 u th;t ve h-)Ye ^ !?;■-ihr^ r-Ai;; of ,-;ction; and if cuunsyl for ciij-xipjnt 1;hLn> u:;t.i u.Ly :;.uy ^aiit ^>- answer thnt mfTiJ ext-sneiveiy than t>wMgiK scope of the present answer, paiiiRT.s ^y^v haf Vjtler »dUiholcL their ansv/tr. J.Jr. Ciih)t:iiir;: ;fe :7lil rlthhoXd it. Tho C -urt: If ;;0u people cons in on Tuavdnj ffith an air.end-msnt brinr^in^^ in other pnrtitin., will %te he f.fcie f^ go any-thxnff n«xt wech in takin^^ evidance? !\?r, Ch«:!r:!!m: >Jo, If htjy are ordoroj:! to bo hrou--ht in thaywi.1 hovo to frarKi thtir pleadinf;«. ^Ii dovirt: You -wouldnt ff»»>l^ like rci?v^ &hf sd vith yourbrnrh of ^hc cfeao? Mr. r^ifir»*Ji.* No, >.ir. Ir. Bri ^: Wo b«IidV6 froci a c onfer«n( a va have hed v/ithMr. Loon^rd, ttat *hey fill p^o^ab^y sp-Jwr and t>i<^rG isillb© no del*-;. Th! Ontaii^- Fv)r«.-r Tot-M^-y ■••v^ r- i.itlcne ox-
Text Appearing After Image:
a J 5n < u - OL -OS 4 56789 101112 =■ 13 •I 2 •- K-* re a: 1516 1718)920212223242526272829 troriely close, to aay tiie least, with the defvndan\. SanAntonio Water Com^-any end their defons© mist be prtjtty ; ear-ly identical. I dont esoo viiry any injv4rtic« would bo v?rouf_^tto ;hQ pre?jttyt dofuxlsntx if it ahould procoed vxUt Vaointroduction of its evidEnce. If the Power Conisny wimted afew daye i.-ey could coca& in later. But, wo neednt be de-layori m ^le proaecution of tlu) caaa if w? »aito d tan daysfor y^dr unswer. it v il taJte ioiv-or fruai t^\at to put inthtj rioftndttnt*3 case, Mr. Chao ;an: I novc-r h-<d any relations with the OntarioPoi^p-r Conpany BDd I cant afjaurie t^at <.b©y want ?^«3 in theca«R, aw I hwe pretty f?:ood re&son to believe t at itwont 7mnt ne, Tne Ontario Pover Cora.«.ny has a tauch closerre 1 at, ion o the bond held ere than it has to ihe iSan Anton-io Water Conpany. Hio Union Tiv:-r^ Coninar.y ia Uie trustee. ^r* Brit*: I

Note About Images