Wikimedia Commons

File talk:COVID-19 Pandemic Cases in Poland Powiats.svg

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Megaemce in topic Update requests April

Good afternoon, you should update this file, because: We've got case in Nisko County. On this (https://www.gov.pl/web/koronawirus/wykaz-zarazen-koronawirusem-sars-cov-2) map we haven't got marked case of illness, but here "Ministerstwo Zdrowia" confirmed case of infection -> https://twitter.com/MZ_GOV_PL/status/1238440876231311363. Sorry for my English, but I'm still learning. @Megaemce: Qba0202 (talk) 20:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC) PS. O, widzę, że chyba jesteś Polakiem, zaaktualizuj proszę mapkę, bo potwierdzono przypadek zakażenia w powiecie niżańskim. Qba0202 (talk) 20:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Qba0202: ok, w następnej aktualizacji wrzucę (:

Govt gives up on powiat data? edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

@Megaemce: It looks like the govt/MOH has given up on providing per-powiat counts. Or shifted them to a less obvious place. Boud (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Megaemce: Could you please give the source of the powiat data since 17 March? The Bygdoszcz/bydgoski mixup makes the previous govt data a little bit suspicious in terms of data quality, but now we have no data at all. I'm not convinced that adding a table with 380 (or so) powiats would make sense on either the pl or en Wikipedia pages, so it's not clear to me how you could make a high-quality long-term usable source trace if you're getting these from individual local newspapers (for example). I'll probably raise this as a discussion point on the en page unless you have a simple clean sourcing solution: I don't think it's a good idea to have our top-of-right-column map based on unsourced data. Boud (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Boud: can do that. I will try to do that later today. Megaemce (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Boud:   Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megaemce (talk • contribs) 19:18, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Megaemce: Wow! Impressive effort. I updated the links at en + pl. Hopefully that will encourage some others to help; it's possible that some powiaty will stay blank through the first 1-2 month peak and gradual drop, and maybe only fill up during the successive rebounds over the 12-18 months waiting for vaccines to become properly tested and mass produced. So the map is definitely useful. Boud (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Update requests March edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago77 comments12 people in discussion
  Done
  • Doszedł jeszcze w Białogardzie, Ostrołęce, Olecku i Lubaczowie. Swoją drogą, możesz próbować podawać oprócz powiatów także liczbę przypadków na powiat, gdyż także taką możliwość dawała mapka skasowana przez ministerstwo. --Kamilhrub (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Podasz jakieś źródła? Póki mi nikt nie pomoże nie będę robił więcej niż powiaty bo to i tak dużo roboty. Megaemce (talk) 11:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Proszę bardzo. Białogard [6], Ostrołęka [7], Olecko [8], Lubaczów [9], Przysucha [10]. Doszedł jeszcze Włocławek (miasto) [11]. Pozdrawiam, --Kamilhrub (talk) 12:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done
  Done
  • Chyba jest błąd - na mapce zaznaczone miasto Skierniewice, a w źródłach jest powiat skierniewicki (z podanego linku wynika, że faktycznie chodzi o powiat skierniewicki, bo wymieniana jest gmina Nowy Kawęczyn). Meteor2017 (talk) 06:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ok, poprawię to dzisiaj. Dzięki. Megaemce (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
Myślę, że trochę to na wyrost. Nawet na angielskiej wikipedii nie dodają aż takich znaczników. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megaemce (talk • contribs) 10:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done
  Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megaemce (talk • contribs) 06:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megaemce (talk • contribs) 08:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megaemce (talk • contribs) 15:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done choć uważaj na wyborczą bo blokuje czasem dostęp Megaemce (talk) 05:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Powiat prudnicki [79]. --

ElCet (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Done już było wyżej. Megaemce (talk) 05:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 05:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done. I nie pominąłem, ale się pomyliłem (; Megaemce (talk) 14:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done w Strzyżowie podałeś źródło to samo co w Puławach, ale znalazłem inne. Megaemce (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 05:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 10:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 10:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ten Bolesławiec chyba zostawię, bo tą osobą którą została pozytywna była obywatelka Danii. Wojewoda pewnie dał dane na podstawie miejsc pochodzenia, a tu jednak nie mamy mapki "miejsce zamieszkania zarażonych koronawirusem" ale miejsce gdzie koronawirus został potwierdzony. Więc jak dla mnie Bolesławiec powinien zostać. Co myślisz? @Kamilhrub: Megaemce (talk) 16:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Z tymi Ząbkowicami to jednak pojechałeś bo nigdzie o nich nie pisano (; Megaemce (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Tylko że to mapa od samego wojewody dolnośląskiego. O Lubaniu też nie pisano, a tu nagle 9 przypadków. --Kamilhrub (talk) 17:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Sorki zmęczony jestem to nie napisałem tego w pełni poprawnie. Wojewoda dał mapkę na której zaznaczył skąd pochodzą ludzie zarażeni koronawirusem. W powiecie bolesławieckim był przypadek i jest do udokumentowane, ale chora była pochodzenia duńskiego więc dlatego pewnie nie pojawiła się na mapce wojewody. Megaemce (talk) 18:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Turecki już był (: Megaemce (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 18:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Update requests April edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago25 comments13 people in discussion
  Done Megaemce (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 07:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 15:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 18:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done Megaemce (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Kamieński zaznaczony. Grudziądzki odznaczony. Przecież Grudziądż i grudziądzki są osobno. W Inowrocławiu jest dużo przypadków, a ten należy do powiatu inowrocławskiego. Ełcki dodany. Megaemce (talk) 08:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:COVID-19_Pandemic_Cases_in_Poland_Powiats.svg&oldid=413286544"
Return to the file "COVID-19 Pandemic Cases in Poland Powiats.svg".