User:F. Riedelio/Quality Image Promotion/2016

Quality Image Promotion 2016

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 12 30 004 Diagonalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 06 12 003 Diagonalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 04 03 002 Diagonalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 04 21 004 Räder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 06 08 001 Räder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 02 06 003 Räder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 17:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 08 19 050 Hund Wallberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 12:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2006 09 06 180 Leuchtturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please leave one extra line between your nominations --Cccefalon 14:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2005 10 01 002 Räder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 08 08 001 Diagonalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments simple but effective --Daniel Case 06:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 11 01 029 Wolfsburg, Neustadt an der Weinstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:12, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 05 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Forst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support One might complain about the noise. However, for me it's acceptable. Good quality. --Code 18:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 04 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Forst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support One might complain about the noise. However, for me it's acceptable. Good quality. --Code 18:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 023 2015 09 24 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 016 2015 09 24 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 039 2015 09 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:04, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 006 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 07 14 003 Fenster mit Blumenkasten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please modify the filename ("unbenannt") add add the location of the window. The reflection of the photographer is disturbing, but acceptable. --XRay 16:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Weak  Support Location still missing. Please add the name of the town or village. --XRay 10:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Location added, file renamed and reflection removed. --F. Riedelio 13:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 11 01 036 Leopold Reitz Weg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but please add the location of the sign. --XRay 16:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Location added. --F. Riedelio 14:07, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 005 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 01 2015 09 22 Kulturdenkmaeler Ludwigshafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 02 2015 09 22 Kulturdenkmaeler Ludwigshafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Strange metadata. --Ermell 14:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 06 2015 09 22 Kulturdenkmaeler Ludwigshafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What are that strange stripes on the sky? --A.Savin 16:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. The strips are completely unclear and not even noticed me. I've uploaded an improved version. --F. Riedelio 13:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)  Support OK. --A.Savin 14:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 09 18 002 Fenster mit Blumenkasten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 10 11 004 Weathered window shutter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 05 2015 09 22 Kulturdenkmaeler Ludwigshafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 08 2015 09 22 Kulturdenkmaeler Ludwigshafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 13:34, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 298 Seu de Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite noisy, but good quality. --Uoaei1 17:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 343 Fernmeldehandwerker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 248 San Salvador Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 09:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 266 San Salvador Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 297 Seu de Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 14:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 345 2015 06 08 Creu de Llombards.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 337 2015 06 08 Creu de sa Cala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 025 2015 06 02 Castell de Bellver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment Right column is tilted, but perhaps QI--Lmbuga 16:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment Corrected version upoaded. --F. Riedelio 07:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 07 2015 09 22 Kulturdenkmaeler Ludwigshafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 253 San Salvador Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 256 San Salvador Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 06 22 032 Roemischer Steinbruch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 12 29 033 Speyerer Dom Krypta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 12 29 035 Speyerer Dom Grabplatte Rudolf von Habsburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 050 2015 06 02 Castell de Bellver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy sky, but good enogh for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 06 22 027 Roemischer Steinbruch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 043 2015 06 02 Castell de Bellver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would a less tight format be better here? --Milseburg 19:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Less tight format uploaded. --F. Riedelio 07:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)  Support I think it´s a good single shot now. --Milseburg 03:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 09 08 022 Abriss Tortenschachtel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 08 05 001 Briefkasten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 06 06 003 Briefkasten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 07 14 002 Briefkasten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But the mailbox is a replica. -- Spurzem 23:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 06 22 028 Roemischer Steinbruch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Would be interesting to know which camera(s) you use? --Moroder 14:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC) @Moroder: As you can see in the Hidden categories I use a Canon EOS 7D with the lens Tamron SP AF 24–70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD. The metadata is unknowingly altered. --F. Riedelio 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 06 22 031 Roemischer Steinbruch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 04 23 114 Speyerer Dom Südseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Vertical banding on sky; probably needs redevelopment --A.Savin 12:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Redeveloped version uploaded, hope it's better. --F. Riedelio 15:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Sorry not better afaics --A.Savin 21:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)  Done New version: Noise in the sky removed. --F. Riedelio 17:08, 6 February 2016 (UTC)  Support OK now --A.Savin 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 04 19 004 Reflexionen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 07 18 002 Reflexionen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 03 14 283 Seu de Mallorca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 06 10 009 Klosterruine Limburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity the lights right below, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 07 21 016 Hambacher Schloss Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please have a llok to your EXIF data. May be and old release of Lightroom? --XRay 18:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 07 21 033 Hambacher Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 08 18 006 Ehemaliges Rathaus, Marktplatz 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I find it does not need perspective correction.--Rftblr 19:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 06 26 003 Reflexionen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 08 20 006 Burg Erfenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 08 09 004 Sankt Nantwein, Wolfratshausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some noise, but OK for QI --A.Savin 17:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 08 09 002 Sankt Nantwein, Wolfratshausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Forget the smart phone mention. --Ermell 19:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 07 15 001 Reflexionen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 05:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 08 09 005 Sankt Nantwein, Wolfratshausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Sharp enough for QI. --Michael Barera 05:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 028 2014 08 04 Urlaub Sulden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 031 2015 12 29 Wiki Loves Earth 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments blue CA at the tree should be corrected. Otherwise good, so still ok IMHO for QI --Carschten 23:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)