Open main menu

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:


2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 19:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Raderstoomboot De MajesteitEdit

Beste Bezeh, Bedankt voor het herstellen van deze erg slordige fout van mijn kant. Kennelijk veel te vlug willen zijn, want ik weet dat het niets met radar te maken heeft. Plus dat werd in 1926 denk ik nog niet echt toegepast op boten. want in 1904 heeft Duitser Christian Hülsmeyer de radar uitgevonden en moest nog eerst verder ontwikkeld worden. Maar bij je tweede verandering die u heeft gedaan daar staat deze opmerking bijgevoegd "De Majesteit heeft raderen in plaats van een schroeg". Hier weet ik even geen raad mee, daar ik het na mijn mening niet over een schroeg of schroef heb gehad? Vr. gr. Antoine.01 (talk) 16:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Ik had in één keer willen schrijven over de schroeF, maar drukte iets te vroeg op de enter, en zag pas later dat het fout was... Nu heb ik mijn vinger bezeerd en met een verbandje (héél klein) gaat het typen nog slechter.. (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Deze bezeerde vinger komt hopelijk toch niet door het type? Of heeft het te maken met de schroef van de boot (geintje). Hoop dat uw vinger zich weer snel zal herstellen zodat u weer gewoon kan type. O ja, bij het lemma waar ik gisteren de foto bij heb geplaatst daar had ik de fout niet gemaakt met radar. Wonderlijk dat ik het op de ene plek wel goed heb neergezet en op de andere plek niet? Maar nogmaals bedankt voor uw hulp hierin en een prettig weekend toegewenst, vr. gr. Antoine.01 (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Het Voorburg 8, CulemborgEdit

Beste Bezeh, je haalde het Rijksmonumentsjabloon van deze foto af, weet je meer dan ik? Ilonamay (talk) 10:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)


File:MetroKralingsezoom4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

  • I know that this sign was only there tempory (tijdelijk in Dutch) but it is an important milestone in the history of the metrostation. It is therefore used there, please don't delete this file again.--Henk Bezemer (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "".