User talk:Cayambe/Archive12

Copyright status: File:Luxembourg fortress in 1792 by J. W. von Goethe – Breedewee a Schlassbréck.jpg

Copyright status: File:Luxembourg fortress in 1792 by J. W. von Goethe – Breedewee a Schlassbréck.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Luxembourg fortress in 1792 by J. W. von Goethe – Breedewee a Schlassbréck.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olm, vers le cimetière forestier - piste cyclable - deux panneaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bremen, Turmhotel Weserblick 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 17:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinnekswiss – Carpinus betulus 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Réserve naturelle Wéngertsbierg – Mur à pierres sèches 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg - Piste cyclable Eisch-Mamer vers Olm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! George Mergenthaler Memorial 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 121 avenue du X-Septembre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NS-Ordensburg Vogelsang Sept 2019a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville, Pfaffenthal – aire de jeux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eschweiler, Wiltz – Maison de 1852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Café Halte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bavigne – monument aux morts 1940-1945 b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City 121 avenue du X-Septembre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:27, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urftstausee mit Vogelsang, b 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NS-Ordensburg Vogelsang Sept 2019b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NS-Ordensburg Vogelsang – Fackelträger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urfttalsperre, flussabwärts, 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obersee, Schilder am Schiffanleger Rurberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obersee, Rurberg, Paulushofdamm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:25, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz), Duerfstrooss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Eschweiler (Wiltz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz), Duerfstrooss a Kierch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière de Wiltz, morgue – Notre-Dame de Fátima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:27, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz) cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Velvet 06:42, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenthal, parc Odendahl 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:43, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière de Wiltz – chapelle et morgue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenthal, parc Odendahl 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 18:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olm, maison à démolir, 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piste cyclable Eisch-Mamer (PC14) vers Olm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Olm SICONA 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:14, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olm, rue de Capellen, maison à démolir, latéral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:14, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olm, vers le cimetière forestier - piste cyclable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle A3 latéral – Hiwwelpark Luxembourg-ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urftstausee mit Vogelsang 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The highlights are a bit too harsh imo. Can you tone them down a bit or are the clouds raw overexposed? --Trougnouf 22:04, 9 August 2021 (UTC).  Done Reworked from the RAW file. Thanks for the review. --Cayambe 06:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)  Support It's much better, thank you --Trougnouf 09:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC) There's quite a blue cast that should be removed. --Zinnmann 07:17, 12 August 2021 (UTC) Done Blue cast removed. Better now? --Cayambe 09:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you, yes it's better now. Pro. --~~~~ --Zinnmann 15:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg A3 vers rond-point Gluck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville, Hiwwelpark 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle A3 – Hiwwelpark Luxembourg-ville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg-ville, parc Odendahl vers Pont rouge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Rodhullandemu 17:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vallée de la Sure depuis Hëlt – centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Rodhullandemu 17:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport – barrage Sure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! River Sûre downstream of Rosport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capellen et Olm, rue de la Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 14:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière de Wiltz – Jardin du souvenir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport – Construction d'une passe à poissons 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de la Sure – 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport – Construction d'une passe à poissons 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport – Construction d'une passe à poissons 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hollerich, arrière-cour, proche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ouette d'Égypte à Rosport 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great pic! --Stepro 12:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, N10, Station d'épuration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport parc public.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panneau routier à Rosport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:24, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, carrefour – barrage et centrale hydroélectrique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:24, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Hollerich, arrière-cour, large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What is really sharp, maybe adding some enhance filter, most digital images needs it. Consider using other format than jpg, it's destructive. --Goran tek-en 19:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, don't understand the jpg comment- it's the normal format here and depends where you start from. We can't host RAW files and TIFs might be unnecessarily large. Perhaps it's just a non-optimal jpg format? Rodhullandemu 12:26, 22 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Undoubtedly good quality. If Goran tek-en would like to have other image formats, then he should discuss it at a suitable point. --Steindy 20:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport, pont flottant 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:36, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaffenthal, parc Odendahl 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, lac de barrage vers l'aval 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Rosport, amont du canal de la centrale hydroélectrique 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Rosport, amont du canal de la centrale hydroélectrique 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--MaedaAkihiko 02:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Velvet 06:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, lac de barrage vers l'aval 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, rond-point près pont sur la Sûre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:30, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, lac de barrage vers l'amont 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont sur la Sûre – Ralingen vers Rosport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Could have gone with ISO100 but it makes no visible difference. --Trougnouf 20:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont sur la Sûre à Rosport – vers l'aval 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 08:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, lac de barrage vers l'amont 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, lac de barrage vers l'aval 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport, pont flottant 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de barrage et pont à Rosport 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport – aval du canal d'amenée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In the upper right side of the picture, some strange white dots that should be removed. --Halavar 12:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)  Done White spots removed. They were flying seeds of the willow trees that were flying around in massive numbers that day. I didn't notice them when taking the photo. Thanks for the review. --Cayambe 22:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. QI for me. --Halavar 23:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport – pont vers N10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinheim, rue de la Montagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport terrain de camping.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pétange Hierschtbierg – Monument Mère de Dieu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 23:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinheim – Hôtel Gruber 2021d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinheim – Hôtel Gruber 2021a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasperich – Ban de Gasperich 2021 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But the bright midtones could be a little bit darker. --XRay 08:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Done You are right, I have darkened the bright midtones a bit. --Cayambe 20:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pétange Hierschtbierg – Monument Mère de Dieu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 13:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! José de Viera y Clavijo – Museo de Bellas Artes, Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 – edifice of the Parliament, plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz 2021 – fisherman with sargo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthus berthelotii in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)  Question Why is the file description "An individual of Anthus campestris"? -- Ikan Kekek 22:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) Good question :-) I first identified the species as A. campestris... But I later asked for help with the id. in the Geman WP, where there is a page for that. And Haplochromis suggested the correct identification. I've corrected the species name in the description. Thanks for checking. --Cayambe 23:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for clearing that up. -- Ikan Kekek 02:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Orotava 2021 – Calle Hermano Apolinar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Orotava 2021 – Hotel Victoria, entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz de Tenerife – Parlamento de Canarias, escudo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont sur la Sûre à Rosport – vers l'aval 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 08:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, lac de barrage vers l'amont 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport, lac de barrage vers l'aval 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport, pont flottant 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de barrage et pont à Rosport 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport – aval du canal d'amenée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In the upper right side of the picture, some strange white dots that should be removed. --Halavar 12:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)  Done White spots removed. They were flying seeds of the willow trees that were flying around in massive numbers that day. I didn't notice them when taking the photo. Thanks for the review. --Cayambe 22:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. QI for me. --Halavar 23:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique de Rosport – pont vers N10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinheim, rue de la Montagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosport terrain de camping.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pétange Hierschtbierg – Monument Mère de Dieu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 23:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinheim – Hôtel Gruber 2021d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinheim – Hôtel Gruber 2021a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasperich – Ban de Gasperich 2021 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But the bright midtones could be a little bit darker. --XRay 08:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC) Done You are right, I have darkened the bright midtones a bit. --Cayambe 20:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pétange Hierschtbierg – Monument Mère de Dieu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 13:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage Rosport 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:02, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! José de Viera y Clavijo – Museo de Bellas Artes, Santa Cruz de Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 – edifice of the Parliament, plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz 2021 – fisherman with sargo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthus berthelotii in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)  Question Why is the file description "An individual of Anthus campestris"? -- Ikan Kekek 22:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC) Good question :-) I first identified the species as A. campestris... But I later asked for help with the id. in the Geman WP, where there is a page for that. And Haplochromis suggested the correct identification. I've corrected the species name in the description. Thanks for checking. --Cayambe 23:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for clearing that up. -- Ikan Kekek 02:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Orotava 2021 – Calle Hermano Apolinar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Orotava 2021 – Hotel Victoria, entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz de Tenerife – Parlamento de Canarias, escudo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz 2021 – Av Marqués de Villanueva del Prado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 21:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz 2021 – Calle San Juan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:11, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egretta garzetta 04 in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Cayambe! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife 2018 – Plaza de Europa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz 2021 – view towards east of town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Orotava 2021 – Plaza de San Francisco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Orotava 2021 – Jardín Victoria 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)