CUSH

Go to the user page on the English Wikipedia by clicking here.

File:Standard Model of Elementary Particles.svg edit

When you update the file, don't discard the work I did in correcting the margins... AnonMoos (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

July edit

The newest redesign doesn't have the "three generations of matter (fermions) I / II / III" labels... AnonMoos (talk) 12:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

True. Cush (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

You reverted my changes without specifying an operating system or browser with the issue or exactly what the issue was. I had checked the image on librsvg, Chrome, Edge, and Firefox; Edge has a small problem with baseline adjust. My version uses Arial with a fallback to sans-serif and Times New Roman with a fallback to serif. All modern SVG user agents should have sans-serif and serif fonts designated per CSS. Glrx (talk) 20:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have reviewed your file. It is in fact quite well structured and clean svg code. My tests on mobile devices and on desktop PCs do not render it as bad as I had initially thought. Hence, I will make a few minor modifications and additions and re-upload it. Then I will derive a variant to replace File:Standard Model of Elementary Particles + Gravity.svg from it. Cush (talk) 13:56, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:मानक प्रतिमान.svg edit

Deat Cush, Thanks for updating File:मानक प्रतिमान.svg but it will be better if you can add flavor of particles. Like every quark have 3 type of flavors. English version of this File:Standard Model of Elementary Particles.svg has it. I tried to do same but due to less knowledge about this software I couldn't do the same. So can you please help me more in this case.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 00:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, in the English version, I have also removed the flavors for quarks and other variants. There have been some complaints, so I changed the diagram again. Cush (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Cush. ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 13:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello.

Can you also add Montenegro in File:Countries which banned Russian aircraft from their airspace due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.svg? This map is widely used across Wikipedia.

Yours sincerely, 31.200.17.241 23:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I did today. However, the changes were made here : Mutually_closed_airspace_20220301.svg Cush (talk) 00:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I also altered the file that you referenced. Cush (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Hi Kosovo has banned Russia from it's airspace https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2022/02/28/north-macedonia-kosovo-albania-join-sanctions-on-russia-montenegro-announces-them/ — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:587:E207:8B00:2075:DC48:3021:1267 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for the note. Kosovo, Albania, and Macedonia are already shown in blue in the map. Cush (talk) 11:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi again :) , Albania and North Macedonia are shown but Kosovo not. Kosovo is shown as part of Serbia (grey). — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:587:E207:8B00:2075:DC48:3021:1267 (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
You are right. The Kosovo area was hidden. I changed it to be shown. Cush (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello.
Although it is partially recognized, can you also show Kosovo in File:Mutually closed airspace 20220301.svg? It does not appear in the map. A news source about Kosovo's application of the airspace ban to Russia, has also been added in this file.
Yours sincerely, 31.200.9.122 18:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello.
I withdraw the update request, because the map has been updated.
Yours sincerely, 31.200.13.53 16:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg edit

Hi, I've already added a topic on the file's talk page but I don't think people read it very often. Anyway, the photon icon links to the proton page and I don't know how to edit it myself so... https://i.imgur.com/6G7B755.png Renyu777 (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

IP User 71.191.244.125 made the erroneous change to the Template a week ago. I reverted it now. Thank you for the notice. Cush (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol rights edit

I just got hit by the same disruptive policy, so I looked at your first two posts there and agree with them. Your argument about science is a good one, but it also holds in other areas. That said, how about the options to either individually request autopatrol rights (as i did), or lower the threshold for them and automatically do so? ◅ Sebastian Helm 🗨 11:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply