User talk:Ermell/Archive/4

Latest comment: 7 years ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion


Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Kriegerdenkmal-7313112-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Ölbergruppe-7313114-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Church-7313109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Hauptstrasse-7313150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Haus-7313107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a little bit of perspective correction. W.carter 10:04, 10 August 2016 (UTC)  Done
I think this is what you meant but I dont agree with you. If one is not standing in front of a building you are unable to get straight lines. For me the correction looks unnatural. Thanks for the review anyway.--Ermell 20:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Oh dear, you misunderstood me, sorry for not being clear. I only meant that the walls were leaning a little bit, not that the whole building should be square. Look at this pic of a building, before and after correction, that is what I meant. I do apologize! W.carter 12:53, 11 August 2016 (UTC)  Done
Gave it a try and hope it is ok.Thanks--Ermell 19:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Perfect! QI. :) W.carter 20:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-P8074272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 03:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marek-Janowski-3098925BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Rathaus7313149-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-Altar-4242493hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-Altar-4242509hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-Altar-4242514-HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-Kanzel-4242499hdr-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:09, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-Kirche-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walberla-Gedenkstein-P8074295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments At (20/900) there is something that could be a dust spot on the sky but it's so close to the edge it does not matter. GQ. -- Renardo la vulpo 07:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walberla-Pretzfeld-P8074280-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walberla-Kreuz-P8074270-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Problems solved? The image looks good to me. --Basotxerri 20:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wichsenstein-church-7313185-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:12, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kümmersreuth-Kirche-5164090-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kümmersreuth-4242469hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wichsenstein-rock-7313203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 14:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-Kirche-Decke-4242559-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothmannsthal-Kirche-4242478hdr-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loffeld-Bildstock-8155842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loffeld-Bildstock-8155835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loffeld-Bildstock-8155834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 21:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loffeld-church-8155827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sehr schön! --Hubertl 20:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loffeld-village-hall-8155830-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Kapelle-8155650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Kapelle-8155661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Kapelle-8155654-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Kapelle-8155653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Kapelle-8155649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Ehrentafel-8155662-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kümmersreuth-Kirche-5164089-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo from which quality is high enough for a Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-Bildstock-8155729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-cross-8155730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-Kriegerdenkmal-8155741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (but I would crop the pole at the bottom) --Berthold Werner 09:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-house--8155738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-Fachwerkhaus-8155736.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-crucifix-8155735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-Bildstock-8155733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wichsenstein-7313195-Pano-PS-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Romansthal-Bildstock-P8145585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Romansthal-Bildstock-P8145642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Romansthal-Bildstock-P8145640.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Haus-8145385-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Neidkopf-8145387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopfenmühle-Staffelstein-8145646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-Heiligenhäuschen-8155745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-Bauernhaus-Fachwerk-8155743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GC Ezarate 22:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Fachwerkhaus8145383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Sankt-Wendelin-8145475-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, shadows are not too strong, good perspective. So quality is high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 07:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Altar-8145467-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Expsoure mgmt of the windows could be better, but it isn't disturbing in this case --Poco a poco 10:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Altar-8145452-HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Seitenaltar-8145453-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Kanzel-8145425-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Kirche-8145439-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 15:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-organ-Loft-8145418-HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Sankt Wendelin-8145390-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-castle-8145379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Schloss-8145381-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walberla-Wiesenthau-P8074308-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry for my delay, it´s ok now! --Hubertl 11:20, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligier-50L-P8216670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Haus-8217005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Haus-8216991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Haus-8216992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-8216982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:47, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Haus-8216996-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Haus-8216995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Gasthof-8216987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Gasthaus-8217003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:55, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-8247015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-8247012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Haus-8247007-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support --Christian Ferrer 17:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Buernhaus-8247009-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Fachwerkhaus-8247016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligier-50L-P8216671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough and well composed --Daniel Case 16:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-P8257223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-8257231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-8257234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-8257240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-8257238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-8257243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI although the top crop is a bit tight IMHO --Poco a poco 10:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Maximiliansbrunnen-8257242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebermannstadt-Kruzufix-8216683-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame on those busy background, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebermannstadt-Kriegerdenkmal-8216690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Altes-Rathaus-P8257276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo from which quality is high enough for a Q1photo. I think you might have a much better composition if it is possible to take more distance to the main object (and use in this case a higher f-value). --Michielverbeek 20:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-altes-Rathaus-Malerei-P8257286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This is really weird. Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Kirche-Altar-8216762-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pretzfeld-Kirche-8216712-HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßberge-ehemaliger-DDR-Grenzzaun-P8145356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternberg-Bildhäuschen-8145360-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - July - Leaf veins‎/Winners

  Photo Challenge Winner
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Blattadern-wein-P7089798-PS.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Leaf veins, in July 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

  Photo Challenge – Third Place
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Leaf-veins-7069249.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Leaf veins, in July 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

--Jarekt (talk) 02:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marter-Rattelsdorf-8033621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßberge-ehemaliger-DDR-Grenzzaun-P8145357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-house-8287605-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßberge-ehemaliger-DDR-Grenzzaun-P8145358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßberge-ehemaliges-DDR-Grenztor-P8145355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-Bildstock-8145583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-house-8287605-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-city-gate-8287607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hellingen-Kirche-P8145347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zapfendorf-Bildstock-P8033612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-war-memorial-8287612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-war-memorial-8287610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-Fountain-8287638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-Stadttor-8287642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-Sundial-8287608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-church-8287639-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-church-8287615-HDR-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-Kirche-orgel-8287625-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-Kirche-8287641-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Brunnen 49, Berlin-Mitte, 160827, ako.jpg

Hallo Ermell, Danke für Deine Kritik des Bildes und dass Du Dir so viel Zeit dafür nimmst, aber die Perspektive ist richtig. Die untere Linie ist tatsächlich nicht horizontal. Das mag nur so aussehen, weil sie von Sträuchern verdeckt wird. Das Gebäude wird auf dem Bild tatsächlich trapezförmig dargestellt, was normal ist, wenn man ein Gebäude von der Seite aus aufnimmt und die vertikalen Linien korrigiert. Wie dem auch sei - ich bitte Dich, einfach auf Decline zu gehen, dann können wir das im Consensual Review weiterdiskutieren. Ich halte das Bild so für richtig, wie es ist und werde daran nichts ändern. Besten Dank nochmals und viele Grüße! --Code (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Je länger ich das Bild anschaue desdo mehr glaube ich das Du Recht hast. Sieht merkwürdig aus ist aber korrekt. Gruß zurück. Deine anderen Arbeiten sind auch ausgezeichnet.--Ermell (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Danke für die freundlichen Worte. Ich schätze Deine Bilder auch sehr. Sie sind durchweg interessant und von hoher Qualität. --Code (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stublang-kirche-4242388hdr-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peulendorf-church-9203420-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-P2077142-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michelsberg-Türme-1215108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really cool with the moon in that position! Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria-Limbach-026421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Love it --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neudorf-Kirche St. Clemens-256102-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This is somewhat noisy, however I'll forgive it regarding the extraordinary result. --Basotxerri 20:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peulendorf-altar-9203429 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thurnau-Kirche-P2077186hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thurnau-Schloss-P2077226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Haus-P9040087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stublang-Kapelle-9040008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stublang-Marien-Statue-9040009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 17:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Ermell!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauendorf-Kirche-9040024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauendorf-Kirchentür-9040021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauendorf-statue-9040020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haßberge-Wegweiser-P8145339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krögelhof-Bildstock-9040047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 10:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofheim-Apotheke-8287635-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It´s ok now. --~~~~

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krögelhof-sandstone-column-9040043-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauendorf-church-9040018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauendorf-Mühlrad-9040032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality and interesting IMO--Lmbuga 15:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauendorf-Mühle-9040030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak   Support A little bit of noise, the mill is OK. Disturbing is the roof of the church. IMO the image looks better with the whole church tower. --XRay 16:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krögelhof-chapel-9040041-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krögelhof-Kapelle-9040048-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krassach-Mühle-P4202072PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss-Jägersburg-von-der-Retterner-Kanzel-P5063196PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hankirche-Prächting-P6127103-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansberg-St.Vitus-Seiteneingang-P6127130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfeld-Kirche-5164094-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Wiesentmühle-P5063223hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfeld-Kirche-Innen-5164119hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesenttal-Wöhrmühle-P5083441-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 23:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brennhausen-Wasserburg-8287390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheßlitz-Gedenkkreuz-9110006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment Mosquitoes :-)--Ermell 22:18, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheßlitz-Geleitsäule-9110004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nankendorf-Mühle-3018543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeckendorf-Judenfriehof-9110016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Wiesentmühle-P5063250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Kirche-9040147-HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesenttal-Wöhrmühle-P5083425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeil-St.-Michael-3280163hdrPSPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheßlitz-Fachwerkhaus-tP9110113-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesenttal-Wöhr-P5083431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Judenfriedhof-Zeckendor-P9110039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.-Michael-Zeil-3280202hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeckendorf-9110009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Main subject nice and sharp. However, there some spots on the right of the cross, could you remove them? --Basotxerri 15:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment Mosquitoes :-)--Ermell 12:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
The photographer's life is hard: being attacked by a thousand of mosquitos while taken photos of a cross in a place called Ticks' Village. --Basotxerri 20:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demmelsdorf-Kapelle-Innen-9110104-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demmelsdorf-Kapelle-9110101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demmelsdorf-Kapelle-9110100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.-Michael-Zeil-3280197hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeilitzheim-Bürgerhaus-Eingang-9133228-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt-Fachwerkhaus-9133164-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Judenfriedhof-8145490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuses-Turm-9133137-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altenstein-Kapelle-Ruine-266203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pommersfelden-Kirche-Orgel-6045768-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Very nice and interesting. Could deserve an attempt in FPC, IMO.--Jebulon 09:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt-haus-9133152-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 10:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeckendorf-Judenfriedhof-9110097-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice to see that someone understands a bit about how B&W photography works. --W.carter 10:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeckendorf-Judenfriedhof-9110091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Unusual but interesting composition. --W.carter 10:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt-Haus-9133163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 20:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gößweinstein-Burg-und-Basilika-P5224761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 20:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gößweinstein-castle-P5224684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen-Kirche-P4194633-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Klein-Venedig-5126009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wunderburg-Kirche-9150215-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. The resolution could be better. --XRay 06:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rabeneck-Burg-3018602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments At first I thought it was an old B&W photo, but once I opened it on full size...WOW! There is some red CA in the tree to the right that should be removed though, and some noise reduction in the sky and the water would be very welcome. W.carter 22:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)  Done New and hopefully better version. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 19:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --W.carter 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Wohnhaus-Barock-6218998-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 19:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Fachwerkhaus-9070458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 19:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Wohnhaus-9070469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 19:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Kruzifix-9070467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Marktplatz-9070463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallstadt-Bildstock-P5284999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausbock-6088300 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michaelskirche-rote-Beleuchtung-5264889-PS-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Please check for halos. --XRay 06:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Done New version which is hopefully better. Thanks for the review--Ermell 21:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Weak   Support Yes, it's better. Good for QI. --XRay 07:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Feuerwehrhaus-9070455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Statue-9070460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hitachi Zaxis 225-P8196470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle-P8196469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAN-LKW-P8196475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz-LKW-P8196480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle-Liebherr724-P8196486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Wohnhaus-9070466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality just good enough for a Q1photo. House is white and not overexposed. However lantern crop is not well done and I would remove leaves in right top corner --Michielverbeek 05:00, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAN-LKW-P8196472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAN-LKW-P8196476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Kirche-Tür-8216978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Pfarrhaus-8216981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 20:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Kirche-8216980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Sehr gut !--Jebulon 19:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Kirche-Tür-8216977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Sehr schön.--Jebulon 19:21, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz-LKW-P8196477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support good and interesting composition.--Jebulon 19:25, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz-LKW-P8196478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:20, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufseß-im-Winter-3018497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 07:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giechburg-P1270158-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.  --Bijay chaurasia 08:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altenburg-P1020768-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 08:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz-LKW-P8196481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle-P8196483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Gasthaus-9070459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs some perspective correction, --A.Savin 00:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Hopefully better now.Thanks for reviewing.--Ermell 06:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC) OK for me. --A.Savin 11:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufsess-1220279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Noise well managed --A.Savin 11:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz-4141-P8196484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit tight crop but QI --- Spurzem 09:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAN-TGS-LKW-P8196485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Judenfriedhof-8145513-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think, it's a good quality. --AKirch-Bonn 11:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach-Kirche-8216985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition, slightly distorted though. --Laitche 17:10, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-Hankirche-8155712HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-Hankirche-8155677-HDR-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-Sankt-Wolfgang-9040063-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleukheim-Kirchendecke-9040129-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-Hankirche-Orgel-8155705-HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Denkmal-9070457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Good quality, but first see the note about insecets on the sky, they should be cloned out --Halavar 11:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 06:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
  Support Good now. QI for me -_Halavar 15:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-Pfarrhaus-9240012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Leaning in, perspective correction required --Uoaei1 08:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)  Done I hope it´s better now and thanks for the review.--Ermell 19:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
  Support Ok now --Uoaei1 04:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wustviel-hofportal-9240028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wustviel-Kriegerdenkmal-9240022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wustviel-Kirche-9240026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-9240066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 08:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-Wappen-9240064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-Kirche-9240014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:18, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brennhausen-Burg-8145574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wustviel-War-memorial-9240024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 07:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-Sankt-Sebastian-9240016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-Fachwerkaus-9240020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 07:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-Hanhof-Scheune-8155721-Pano-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Schlenkerla-P8257314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Monopteros-Hain-P1180867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --XRay 11:13, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autobahn-A70-Bamberger-Kreuz-P5284894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster-Banz-9220059-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesen-Kirche-Sankt-Andreas-9180189HDR-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Georgenritt-Senftenberg(Buttenheim)-P1260069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Halavar 14:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg-Schleuse-RMD-Kanal-9240060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-overview-9240068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Church Steeple could have been a little sharper, but good enough for me. The woman who was ophant you probably had in mind.--Famberhorst 15:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallstadt-Kapelle-Sankt-Anna-P5284994-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hallstadt-Kapelle-Sankt-Anna-P5284991-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Judenfriedhof-8145541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 18:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Judenfriedhof-8145520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 18:07, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prölsdorf-overview-9240069-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:35, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberküps-Kirche-8155753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberküps-Kriegerdenkmal-8155752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:43, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Georgenritt-Pferde-Schmuck-P1260193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please check the two very obvious categories you missed. Now added. --W.carter 10:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberküps-Bildstock-8155748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Kruzifix-8145477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 09:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeckendorf-Holocaust-Gedenkstein-9110043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAN-LKW-P8196473.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prächting-Hankirche-8155719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altenburg-P6055902-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support--Jebulon 09:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Judenfriedhof-8145493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Judenfriedhof-8145497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --A.Savin 16:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing-Gasthof-9070462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberküps-Bildstock-8155747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sulzdorf-Judenfriedhof-8145499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeckendorf-Judenfriedhof-9110085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeckendorf-Judenfriedhof-9110092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Ermell/Archive/4".