-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamako Woodworker Portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:20, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yaounde Cell Phone Vendor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Good sharp portrait photo with smooth background bokeh. --Aristeas 11:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suya Seller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abuja Vegetable Vendor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


Better source request for File:Erie Railroad station in Wellsville NY 1910s postcard.webp

edit
Thanks for uploading File:Erie Railroad station in Wellsville NY 1910s postcard.webp. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

čeština | English | svenska | русский | മലയാളം | 中文 | 中文(简体) | +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, 0x0a (talk) 18:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi 0x0a. Thanks for your message. I didn't include the exact URL because it was embedded in the webp files metadata. When I verified this, I learned that the file that I uploaded had the ebay.com URL embedded in it, but when I downloaded it from Commons the Commons URL as embedded in the metadata. In the future I can add the step of pulling the ebay.com URL out and included it when I upload the file.
Is there a best practice for handling postcard scans? I could embed the exact URL, but I don't know how long those are valid on eBay.
I have seen a number of people use the notation "Permission: Pre-1978, no mark" with the following notation:
  • The card has no copyright markings on it as can be seen in the links above.
  • United States Copyright Office page 2 "Visually Perceptible Copies The notice for visually perceptible copies should contain all three elements described below. They should appear together or in close proximity on the copies.
1 The symbol © (letter C in a circle); the word “Copyright”; or the abbreviation “Copr.”
2 The year of first publication. If the work is a derivative work or a compilation incorporating previously published material, the year date of first publication of the derivative work or compilation is sufficient. Examples of derivative works are translations or dramatizations; an example of a compilation is an anthology. The year may be omitted when a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying textual matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or useful articles.
3 The name of the copyright owner, an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of owner.1 Example © 2007 Jane Doe.")
I understand and completely support protecting the rights of copyright holders, but at the same time want to make sure I don't needlessly omit items that could be uploaded.
If there is a guideline or standard practice on this I would appreciate you pointing me to it. I looked, but it is very likely I could have missed it.
Best Regards,
Mark FischerFotos (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I checked some images, but didn't see any URL embedded in the metadata. Instead, it's necessary to provide the source URL on the page so that the Internet Archive can take a snapshot of the source page. So, please fix them before I answer your second question. 0x0a (talk) 06:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I went through the postcards and added the full URLs to ebay.com. Most of the postcards had postmarks, which made it easy to date them. Some didn't have a postmark but were marked as requiring postage of 1 cent. The price didn't go up to 2 cents until 2 November 1917 (https://postalmuseum.si.edu/us-domestic-postcard-rates) so I marked than as being from the 1910s. A few didn't show the back side, but the vendor indicated the postmark date in the text of the listing. There were a very few where the seller listed a date but did not say how they arrived at it. I presumed that vendors who specialize in postcards know the dates based on the postage price or similar cards. The dates listed matched my understanding of the subject matter.
It appears that the source URL which is included in the metadata for the files I kept locally gets erased or overwritten when uploading it to the Commons. I have started included the full URL in my uploads from now on. FischerFotos (talk) 20:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I checked all the files, and all look OK. Frankly, it's not recommended to embed eBay links into images as they often become invalid over time.
Work published in the U.S. between 1929 and 1978 without a copyright notice may be uploaded to Commons with a {{PD-US-no-notice}} tag. Make sure there is no copyright on each side of the postcard and upload them under the same filename. Here is an example. 0x0a (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

edit

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Erie L-1. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 19:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Jmabel. I am slowly getting more active on Wikipedia and in the Commons and I have a lot to learn! FischerFotos (talk) 19:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply