Open main menu

Contents

File:Sylvia H. Williams, director of the National Museum of African Art (NMAfA).jpgEdit

hi, nice upload. however, i changed your license, i don't think you can use PD-Gov for Smithsonian Institution items. if you have questions, talk to user:SarahStierch, who was WIR at SI. Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 22:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Yup! It's no known copyright restriction. It's super confusing. Thanks for uploading that image! :) Sarah (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - The Ink-Drawn National Flag.jpgEdit

All the alleged precision of your "precise" tool doesn't change the fact that your image edit was lossy, while mine was lossless... AnonMoos (talk) 10:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

AnonMoos, as much as I appreciate the attitude, you should relax, take a breath. Its not appreciated. I've uploaded a replacement images that has fewer compression artifacts, and is approximately the same resolution. Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 06:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but your condescending pseudo-cutesie comments do not answer the question of why we should prefer your lossy edits to the historic original, and if your use of the word "precise"[sic] was meant to imply lossless editing, then it was completely incorrect and bogus. General Commons policies would tend to suggest that in many or most cases, such personalistic lossy edits to historic/archival images should be uploaded as a separate file under a new name, so that individual projects or Wikipedias can make their own choice between the two... AnonMoos (talk) 22:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
AnonMoos, the description is included from the tool, "CropTool" not by me, the author of the tool is a non-native english speaker, perhaps you could help him by logging a bug. Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 18:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Tea bowl fixed in the Kintsugi method.jpgEdit

 
File:Tea bowl fixed in the Kintsugi method.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cold Season (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Before and after thumbnail consistancy update.pngEdit

 
File:Before and after thumbnail consistancy update.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2003:45:5C35:C201:9028:43D2:A8B9:4F56 11:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice of upload removalEdit

Dear Jaredzimmerman (WMF)

The Wikimedia Foundation (“Wikimedia”) has taken down content that you posted at File:The_nuclear_football.jpg due to Wikimedia’s receipt of a validly formulated notice that your posted content was infringing an existing copyright.

What Can You Do?

You are not obligated to take any action. However, if you feel that your content does not infringe upon any copyrights, you may contest the take down request by submitting a 'counter notice' to Wikimedia. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position, and you may wish to consult with an attorney.

Filing a Counter Notice

If you choose to submit a counter notice, you must send a letter asking Wikimedia to restore your content to legal@wikimedia.org, or to our service processor at the following address: Wikimedia Foundation, c/o CT Corporation System, 818 West Seventh Street, Los Angeles, California, 90017. The letter must comply with DMCA standards, set out in Section (g)(3)(A-D), and must contain the following:

  • A link to where the content was before we took it down and a description of the material that was removed;
  • A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you have a good faith belief that the content was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled;
  • Your name, address, and phone number;
  • If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court for the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; alternatively, if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where the Wikimedia Foundation can be found, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; and finally,
  • Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, Wikimedia must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter notice, and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter notice. The alleged copyright holder will then have fourteen (14) business days to file a lawsuit against you to restrain Wikimedia from reposting the content. If Wikimedia does not receive proper notification that the alleged copyright holder has initiated such a lawsuit against you, we will repost your content within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days.

Miscellaneous

As a matter of policy and under appropriate circumstances, Wikimedia will block the accounts of repeat infringers as provided by Section 512(i)(1)(A) of the DMCA.

If you would like to learn more about Wikimedia’s policies, please refer to the Wikimedia Terms of Use, available at Terms of use, and the Wikimedia Legal Policies, available at m:Legal/Legal_Policies. More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:

Wikimedia appreciates your support. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this notice.


Sincerely, Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Jaredzimmerman (WMF)".