Hoi JePe, ik zag dat je voor een aantal beschrijvingen w:nl veranderd hebt in :nl. Had ik het verkeerd gedaan, heeft dat met voorkeur voor interwikilinken te maken of is er een bepaalde richtlijn? Ik dacht dat je voor andere wikimediaprojecten dan wikipedia altijd met w:LANDCODE:LEMMA moest linken... Siebrand 18:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Op Commons en Meta kun je gewoon de taalcode van de wikipedia gebruiken voor links. Op Nederlandstalige Wikimediaprojecten zoals nl.wikibooks gebruik je w: voor de Nederlandstalige wikipedia en de taalcode voor hetzelfde Wikimediaproject in een andere taal. Alleen op een ander Wikimediaproject in een andere taal zoals de.wikibooks is de constructie w:nl: nodig. Je linkt dan als het ware naar de Engelstalige wikipedia en aldaar link je weer met nl:artikel naar onze wikipedia. Het uiterlijke verschil zit hem in de url die je in de statusbalk te zien krijgt, met w:nl:artikel krijg je een link naar en.wikipedia.org/wiki/nl:artikel. JePe 19:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
ah, dank je. Voor jou een handige welkomstboodschap! :-) Siebrand 22:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

{{welcome/nl}}

Bedankt, ik zit al sinds 14 december 2004 te wachten op een verwelkoming. ;) JePe 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kyrill (storm) edit

It's nice that you gathered all these photographs, but why haven't you let know about it for anyone from Wikinews? We have been looking for any photographs without success for the whole day and now it occurs that they were there. --Derbeth talk 10:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The category was linked from the article on the english wikipedia. Also a lot of images were already linked from that article. So if you are searching for images, the best you can do is viewing the article on the english wikipedia and the interwikis to other wikipedia's. On this way I have also gathered this images. JePe 15:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Category:Canned beverages edit

Category discussion notification Category:Canned beverages has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

--Themightyquill (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Afbeelding van de dag edit

 
Commons:Afbeelding van de dag has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:1C00:1610:5600:A404:296B:6AB5:3F46 10:04, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply