User talk:Llez/Archives/2024 (1)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corculum cardissa (Heart Cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scalptia obliquata (Oblique Nutmeg), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lechklamm - Füssen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitra mitra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corculum cardissa (Heart Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bursa bufonia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mitra mitra (Episcopal Miter), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 17:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lech - Füssen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dosinia lupinus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bursa bufonia (Warty Frog Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunst-Raststätte Illertal-Ost 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Sorry  Comment Please sign the vote --Llez 06:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hopfensee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dosinia lupinus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - Pfarrhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia lupinus ssp. incta, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia lupinus ssp. lincta, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Typhis tubifer, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuttallia obscurata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Olivancillaria vesica 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olivancillaria vesica 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tritia bocholtensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Ercé (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuttallia obscurata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuttallia obscurata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Picture is good but please fix the invalid category. --Plozessor 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Oops, sorry --Llez 08:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crassispira cerithina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:17, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drillia angolensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crassispira cerithina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuttallia obscurata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 10:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I think this should be slightly rotated, otherwise it's really good. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostrea gregarea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dallocardia muricata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drillia angolensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea gregarea, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perrona spirata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scalptia crenifera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perrona spirata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberbergen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyards - Oberbergen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vineyards - Oberbergen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudamussium peslutrae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scalptia crenifera, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudamussium peslutrae 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin 'Sweet Dumpling' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit grainy, do you think you could apply a bit more NR while retaining sharpness? --Plozessor 10:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 14:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Thx! Good quality. --Plozessor 14:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emichsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emichsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side is slightly leaning outward. --Plozessor 06:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:52, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudamussium peslutrae (Seven Rayed Scallop) right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carved pumpkin - Ludwigsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calabash 'Indian Mix' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigsburg Palace - Fountain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is tilted ccw. --Plozessor 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 07:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Favartia rosamiae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mancinella armigera (Belligerent Rock Snail), shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiocardia vulgaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Mistake on an identification ?

Maybe i'm wrong but your file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Larus_argentatus_-_Bremerhaven_01.jpg show a yellow-legged bird. But the Larus Argentatus got pinkish leggs so maybe it can be a Larus fuscus or other ? 2A01:CB1C:41D:3000:A73F:5E18:CD97:D4D6 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I submitted this great photo to an expert ornithologist, Stanislas Wroza. He thinks this bird is a Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Figure and story related categories should be added --Ermell 06:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 11:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meiocardia vulgaris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meiocardia vulgaris, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meiocardia vulgaris, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ocenebra hybrida, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support interesting too. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unio terminalis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Austrolittorina antipodum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chlamys textoria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chlamys textoria, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiatula diphos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Linderhof Statuen

Hallo! alles gut bei dir? ich bin überrascht gewesen, dass letztendlich die Stauen über einen Set FP geworden sind. Aus meiner Sicht wurden die Richtlinien für einen Set nicht erfüllt, gut, egal. Was aber definitiv nicht stimmen kann, ist dass auch dieses Bild File:Linderhof Palace 07.jpg als FP bezeichnet wurde. Ich würde also den Star entfernen, wenn du es auch so siehst. Viele Grüße, Poco a poco (talk) 10:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Myurellopsis parkinsoni 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Myurellopsis parkinsoni 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiatula diphos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hiatula diphos, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium albolineatum, form with multiple lines, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hiatula diphos, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isognomon dunkeri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isognomon dunkeri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isognomon dunkeri, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isognomon dunkeri, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulla striata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 08:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Écomusée d’Alsace 47.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Écomusée d’Alsace 47.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostrea edulis 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bulla striata (Atlantic bubble), fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostrea edulis 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea edulis (European Flat Oyste), fossil right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pupa solidula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ostrea edulis (European Flat Oyster), fossil left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 11:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minnivola pyxidata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 06:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haminoea orbignyana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minnivola pyxidata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pupa solidula (Solid Pupa), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calliostoma hernandezi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:View from Eisenberg castle 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Eisenberg castle 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Ercé (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma hernandezi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 08:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemocardium bechei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 11:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemocardium bechei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 06:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 12:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma depictum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nemocardium bechei (De la Beche's Cockle), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maoricolpus roseus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nemocardium bechei (De la Beche's Cockle), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paphia rotundata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma pulchrum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bittium reticulatum forma scabrum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paphia rotundata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paphia rotundata (Butterfly Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paphia rotundata (Butterfly Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 08:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla quadricincta quadricincta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bittium reticulatum forma antonium, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protapes gallus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protapes gallus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protapes gallus (Rooster Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla quadricincta subaucta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Napaeus spec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Protapes gallus (Rooster Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used--Ercé (talk) 07:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meretrix intercalaris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nemocardium bechei, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nemocardium bechei has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arca navicularis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Napaeus servus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arca navicularis (Indo-Pacific Ark), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meretrix intercalaris, internal mould.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla idairae 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus servus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudochama corbierei 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla idairae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudochama corbierei 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudochama corbierei, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Napaeus magnus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla fritschi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Christianos - Tenerife - Port 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napaeus magnus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Famberhorst (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudochama corbierei, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hopfensee 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hopfensee 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Momordica balsamina - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windows - Playa Santiago 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcanic layers - Playa Santiago 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laevichlamys squamosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña de los Ramones - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laevichlamys squamosa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 06:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla fritschi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 10:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevichlamys squamosa (Squamose Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lo del Gato - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lomo del Azadoe - La Gomera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canariella discobolus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House Alajeró - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla distensa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Playa Santiago 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palm grove - Las Toscas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palm grove - Las Toscas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laevichlamys squamosa (Squamose Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canariella discobolus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful image of a rare species. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scaeochlamys livida 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scaeochlamys livida 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla distensa, shell, banded form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla distensa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roque de Tecina - La Gomera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roque de Tecina - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scaeochlamys livida (Livid Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemicycla distensa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Mirador de Retama - La Gomera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Mirador de Retama - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scaeochlamys livida (Livid Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla distensa, shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decatopecten radula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemicycla distensa, shell, unicoloured form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decatopecten radula 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Mirador de la Curva del Queso - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Mirador de la Curva del Queso - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Playa Santiago 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Vegaipala - La Gomera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Decatopecten radula (Radula Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breakers - Valle Gran Rey - La Gomera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breakers - Valle Gran Rey - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Calera - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coast - Valle Gran Rey - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA --Nikride 07:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nikride 13:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks - Playa Santiago 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Any info about the tree? --Poco a poco 07:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Euphorbia mellifera or Euphorbia lambi, I'm not shure --Llez 09:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Well, we need the id, at least the genus, which is both cases is the same --Poco a poco 09:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Added in the file description --Llez 14:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Decatopecten radula (Radula Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 07:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerithium alutaceum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decatopecten amiculum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riscos de la Mérica - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valle Gran Rey - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Playa - Valle Gran Rey - La Gomera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Decatopecten amiculum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)