If you want to leave me a message, please do so at my talk at en:wikipedia.

Communal Fusions in Luxembourg edit

Communal Fusions in Luxembourg

On the 1st January 2006 there were 2 communal fusions in Luxembourg.

(Bastendorf and Fouren) -> Tandel / Wiltz (canton) (Wilwerwiltz and Kautenbach) -> Kiischpelt / Vianden (canton)

The following maps are concerned:

done:

  • map Tandel
  • map Kiischpelt
  • maps other munic. Vianden (Vianden, Putscheid)
  • map canton Vianden
  • maps other munic. Diekirch (Bettendorf, Bourscheid, Diekirch, Ermsdorf, Erpeldange, Ettelbruck, Feulen, Hoscheid, Medernach, Mertzig, Reisdorf, Schieren)
  • map canton Diekirch
  • map canton Wiltz
  • map other munic. Wiltz (Boulaide, Esch-sur-Sûre, Eschweiler, Goesdorf, Heiderscheid, Lac de la Haute-Sûre, Neunhausen, Wiltz, Winseler)
  • map district Diekirch
  • map canton Redange
  • maps munic. Redange (Beckerich, Ell, Grosbous, Préizerdaul, Rambrouch, Redange, Saeul, Useldange, Vichten, Wahl)
  • map canton Clervaux
  • maps munic. Clervaux (Clervaux, Consthum, Heinerscheid, Hosingen, Munshausen, Troisvierges, Weiswampach, Wincrange)

Tandel is now a part of the canton Vianden (and Bastendorf no longer part of the canton Diekirch)

I think that I've updated all of them now. Bastin8 15:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
right, well done! Markussep 20:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Markussep!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 19:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

A bowl of strawberries for you! edit

  Pumpie had apologized for my partial spelling errors on translations (even slightly minimal ones). When I head to an article not available on the English Wikipedia, I will have to ask an expert to translate on some fields. I will put it on a talk page and translate it on their free time. I will do it as early as Monday. Saving it on my user page didn't work, Translating a mid sized article didn't work. I also suggest that Pumpie is requested for an application to become an administrator. When I follow the guidelines, I become an administrator if it is perfect. I could be unblocked after I apply for an administrator. I am following the rules well again and I am only allowed to follow the rules. Thanks. Terriffic Friendy-o 6 (talk) 23:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

An apology from Pumpie on the English Wikipedia edit

  An apology from Pumpie on the Wikipedia
Pumpie had apologized for my partial spelling errors on translations (even slightly minimal ones). When I head to an article not available on the English Wikipedia, I will have to ask an expert to translate on some fields. I will put it on a talk page and translate it on their free time. I will do it as early as Monday. Saving it on my user page didn't work, Translating a mid sized article didn't work. I also suggest that Pumpie is requested for an application to become an administrator. When I follow the guidelines, I become an administrator if it is perfect. I could be unblocked after I apply for an administrator. I am following the rules well again and I am only allowed to follow the rules. Thanks. Instead of strawberries, It will be a barnstar. This I meant to put once instead of twice, thanks. Terriffic Friendy-o 6 (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

On the user Terriffic Dunker Guy at Wikipedia edit

The user on Wikipedia Terriffic Dunker Guy has no right to be blocked. It was unacceptable to block that user. Some a few additional users (on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia sites including from here, that is Commons) should get protection from blocking a good and respectful user when doing edits in some fields. I took a break on my edits, not that I had a few days to make corrections, I would respond to that question in more than a week and I do not ignore this. A few more users should hav protected me from being blocked on Wikipedia.

Here are the reasons that I respond in the Wikipedia's user page Terriffic Dunker Guy in the section: Errors:

  • First response: Some were accidental, not intentional, the geographical location of Molykreio that I put was accidental, I should put the correct one.
  • Second response: Molykrioi, the valid transliteration, secondary one, this one I put that as unknown.
  • Third response: Molykreio was never part of Chalkeia, I hav forgotten to change that section.
  • Fourth response: The reference on Molykreio with the one from Gavrolimni, I had made a mistake on that, I should hav changed the link to the one with Molykreio.
  • Fifth response: Molykreio is a few kilometers northwest of the Greek National Road 48, I hav already saw the correction on its location. The route does not lead to Agrinio and Ioannina but to Ionia Odos (A5) to get to that route.
  • Sixth response: I had not known which is correct, I will chose to omit that translation from the Greek version.
  • Seventh response: Now I known that section, on newer portions, it will not been put.
  • Eight response: I will correct this

My contributions has to improve more, it has been done in some parts. I do not disrespect to these guidelines. I translate not all but a few sentences into English from Greek at Wikipedia (some in figuration, to a level where the translation has to be correct).

I have obeyed to the editing guidelines. I am very careful on every new edits that I done, on other fields, other users had done the best in good edits (two of them) and has to do more protections to some users that has good editing and correction behavior. I do not disrespect some parts of the guidelines. Any mistakes and errors showed up, I will respond and correct them (some immediately, some by other users, some later), even when I am on an editing break (e.g. a week, a month). When I do another or a new edit, I have to slow down on one part, only two or three sentences can be put in an article, not some - a level where a few sentence can be an error. Even other users are correcting my edits, including Greek geography, a few Greek basketball league teams sections (e.g. one earlier season). At the Greek geography section, even another user can correct my few minor errors in editing.

Terriffic Dunker Guy is User:Pumpie. Pumpie has been well behaved in editing guidelines today, follows to editing corrections and responds to some errors which afterwards has to fix, correct and alter some editing problems, also the user is more educated today. Also the user can properly and correctly translate but now has to translate a few sentences or a part of an article from Greek into English but this time, not using the old Greek-English dictionary. I hav no disrespect to editing guidelines. I do no want to use another user account other than Pumpie. Pumpie should hav been unblocked from Wikipedia due to increased editing behaviors today and behavior to these guidelines and follows them. As a good user can tolerate to follow its guidelines, it is best that Pumpie should be unblocked from Wikipedia.

Outside Wikimedia, I hav a user page on Facebook and Twitter, recently I haven't been using these pages today, I do not hav a blog's user page, not even at Blogspot. I do not hav a YouTube user page, there, I would do discussion pages, not uploading videos there as I obey to their policies there. Also I hav a Wikispace account which I do at the Moon Wiki, today I am not active there. Moon Wiki is being separate from Wikispaces as that site is closing down, pages based on Wikispaces are being moved, part of this I support (other sites part) as it is favorable for another sites and on other pages.

Terriffic Dunker Guy (talk) 20:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

You know that you have been blocked indefinitely from editing English Wikipedia. Trying to evade this block by using (many!) other accounts really doesn't bring you closer to being allowed to edit again. And honestly, your editing hasn't improved enough. Markussep (talk) 13:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

That time on July 10, I had not read the message that I was awared to be blocked and somebody blocked me, I wasn't notified. I saw the message on July 16 that awared me that I was blocked. Put two weeks before the block was put. I was taking a break from editing, later I took another break from my edits. A block would be put if I did not respond to the messages as late as a month, I already responded to the messages. As I was on my break from my editing and had read no few messages, a block put on the user at Wikipedia should be accidental.

My edits has been improved (e.g. some beaches, mollusks, botany, category additions, especially those in astronomy) in some fields but has not been improved in a few fields. Second, two or three other users who rarely or never reviewed my edits can correct my sentence or sections if there's any that an incorrect spelling I put, I do not. My editing has improved in one field, in a few other fields, it was not improving, in a few other fields, it was improving very slowly. In new edits to articles in some Greek geography articles (existing and new articles), the history section I have to avoid a part, what is added has to be all correct, I do mostly other sections.

As I already put earlier, I am obeying to the guidelines and policies. I keep being careful on editing at Wikipedia. Also I continue to read.

I am not evading a block. I am rejecting to create another account in which I oppose. Also I hav edited at Google Maps. Also I am not a blogger, I am not a user at Blogspot, it is mostly crippled in my area. Also I hav been playing video games a few years earlier.

Terriffic Dunker Guy (talk) 02:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply