User talk:Mike Peel

Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

File source is not properly indicated: File:30th Infantry Division SSI.svgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:30th Infantry Division SSI.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Two Cruck Barns at Tatton Park?Edit

Hi Mike, thanks (as always) for uploading so many photo's. When categorising some of Tatton Park, I discovered two distinct buildings called "cruck barn", one of which is listed as: "Timber-framed with brick infill and thatch roof". To some of the photo's descibed as "cruck barn" this does not apply. The two buildings are right next to each other, though as you can see on the map of the listing and with street view. Are there 2 Cruck Barns? --Judithcomm (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Judithcomm: nice to hear from you! I think I might have mis-labeled my photos here. The building shown in File:Cruck barn, Tatton Old Hall.jpg is just behind the buildings I photo'd - you can just see it to the right in File:Tatton Old Hall Outbuildings - - 1494712.jpg. I was assuming that that building was Tatton Old Hall (which is the building I went to the site to try to photograph, but couldn't gain access to), and that the ones in front were the barn(s) (which may just be outbuildings according to the geograph photo's description). I can't seem to access the Historic England website at the moment, so I can't verify that though... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
The Historic England website is working again, and looking at it the building I photographed is just the outbuildings, and they aren't covered by the listing entries. I've updated the descriptions, and recategorised them accordingly. Thanks for pointing out the error! Mike Peel (talk) 21:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Ok, thanks! --Judithcomm (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:G-VWOW (aircraft)Edit

Virgin Galactic cat was removed as there are no pictures of a Virgin Galactic aircraft in the G-VWOW cat. As well as that the Virgin Galactic aircraft is USA registered and not G-VWOW. Good if you could remove Virgin Galactic cat again please. Ardfern (talk) 16:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

But the aircraft is now owned by Virgin Galactic - see en:Cosmic Girl (airplane). Yes it has a new registration, and will presumably look a bit different after its modifications, but it's still the same aircraft underneath. So it makes most sense to me if it's included in the Virgin Galactic category... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Mike Peel".