User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 12:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image. GPS coordinates and a better image description would be helpful. --GRDN711 19:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC) @GRDN711: I'm not sure what you're after with the image description? I didn't have GPS on my camera when I took this, but the category gives the coordinates for the lighthouse. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 16:58, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais du Luxembourg 2011 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darnhall telescope 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add location --Romainbehar 07:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 15:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC) @Romainbehar: Object location added. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:06, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oliver Cromwell statue, Wythenshawe Park, March 2016 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Brighton Beach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Gran Canaria 2021 0015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fox Armoured Car, Monmouth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 21:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tank, Monmouth Regimental Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 21:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Abrigos 2022 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would have cropped the woman at the right, because she does not add anything to the composition --Michielverbeek 19:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC) @Michielverbeek: Thanks for the review, I've cropped the image accordingly. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Abrigos 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 11:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Abrigos 2022 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 11:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darnhall telescope 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but it needs a perspecttive correction --Poco a poco 07:44, 10 July 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Done, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 14:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jet d'eau de Genève, 2011-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Campbell Brown.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Please link your nomination to the relevant Commons category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: I had, but apparently not in the right way! Thanks to @A1Cafel: for fixing. [1] Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Great! Obviously best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunswick Monument, Geneva 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodick Castle 2011 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New College, Oxford 2011 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Brighton Beach 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunswick Monument, Geneva 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de la Caille 2011 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 17:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That's very good, but I feel like it's just a bit slanted. -- Ikan Kekek 19:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the review. I think I rotated it too much - new version uploaded, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Yes. -- Ikan Kekek 02:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jet d'eau de Genève, 2011-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Probably a QI? I'm not quite sure, but please clone out the dust spot in the middle of the left side. -- Ikan Kekek 19:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for the review, dust spot removed. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC) Thanks. Weak  Support, and I wouldn't mind at all for this to go to CR for other opinions. -- Ikan Kekek 02:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Vimto tetrapak and can.JPG

File:Vimto tetrapak and can.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—Granger (talk  · contribs) 13:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento de un Lechero 2021 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:19, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 07:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Pages with script errors

Mike, I assume you had something to do with most categories with {{Wikidata Infobox}} disappearing from Category:Pages with script errors. I am sure glad to see it. Any idea what to do with Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia and Category:Maps about the COVID-19 pandemic in India? Jarekt (talk) 03:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

@Jarekt: This is due to the great work by @LennardHofmann, who has been rewriting the Infobox in Lua as part of GSoC, see Template_talk:Wikidata_Infobox#Lua_rewrite. It's now running a lot quicker than before, but the COVID ones are very tricky due to their size on Wikidata. Also see Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox with bad performance for cases where the Infobox is still running slow. But there's more changes to come...! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Brighton Beach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Wineport Restaurant, Arran 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Wineport Restaurant, Arran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat at Geneva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but localization data would be splendid --MB-one 11:42, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Minor color noise in the sky.) --XRay 05:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Brighton Beach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Bristol, Geneva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective distortion perspective distortion, correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 09:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Thanks for the review. Perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 09:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mow Cop Castle 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abades, Arico 2022 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Table Mountain, Cape Town (MP) 2018 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodick Castle 2011 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 14:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abades, Arico 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abades, Arico 2022 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abades, Arico 2022 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 18:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abades, Arico 2022 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 23:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clear cw tilt --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, I've corrected the perspective, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Yes, it is better --Poco a poco 15:08, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mow Cop Castle 2022 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jet d'eau de Genève, 2011-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:28, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Island of Ugljan 2011 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Matlin 10:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Level of detail is just over the bar, but still ok --Poco a poco 07:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abades, Arico 2022 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mow Cop Castle 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2021 0731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brodick Castle 2011 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torr Righ and King's Cave trail, Arran 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort Perch Rock 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but left part is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 06:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC) @Michielverbeek: Thanks for the review. I've had another go at perspective correction, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:50, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadar 2011 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Brighton Beach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayfarers Arcade 2011-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for 2011 --Tagooty 02:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perch Rock Lighthouse 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2021 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The mobile is nice but the buildings are distracting. Is a perspective correction possible? -- Ikan Kekek 05:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Yes, it's OK for me. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 04:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Santos, Brazil 2017 487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laboratorio de Energía Solar Termoeléctrica 2020 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abades, Arico 2022 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If the subject is the distant buildings, the right fg building is distracting. --Tagooty 03:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty: The subject is both, to show the extent of the site and provide perspective. The foreground building is the same as the distant buildings. Thanks. Mike Peel 21:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks. Suggest improving the Description/Caption with an explanation of what these buildings are. --Tagooty 12:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conwy Railway Bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:52, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samuel I Newhouse, Statten Island Ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre-Dame rear 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shakespeare and Company, Paris 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Henri IV in Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Llandaff tombstone fragment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway line near Hathersage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 10:29, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southport Marine Lake 2011-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality -- Spurzem 07:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhuddlan Castle 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhuddlan Castle 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 04:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Italian Garden, Lyme Park 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samuel I Newhouse, Statten Island Ferry 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AEMet Izaña 2022 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berrington Hall 2022 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2022 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 19:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2022 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 19:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2022 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 18:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2022 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 19:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Orotava 2022 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 19:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2022 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annecy 2011 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Sphere, New York.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 21:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paraty, Brazil 2017 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Paraty, Brazil 2017 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paranapiacaba 2017 299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placenticeras intercalare at the American Museum of Natural History.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleopatra's Needle, New York.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but there is some tilt in ccw direction, I believe --Poco a poco 10:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Rotated a bit, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 19:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleopatra's Needle, New York 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same here, ccw tilted --Poco a poco 10:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Rotated a bit, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Better --Poco a poco 19:08, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Bercy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battery Maritime Building, New York 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Study the Past statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! What is Past is Prologue statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US Capitol 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clitheroe Castle Museum editathon 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brooklyn battery tunnel building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blurry, esp. the emblem. Sharpening may help. The description could be improved as the tunnel is not depicted. --Tagooty 03:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty: I've turned up the sharpening, is that better now? Also corrected the description. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks. --Tagooty 02:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Samaritaine 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's a bit leaning on at left. --Sebring12Hrs 10:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review, I've had another go at fixing the uprights, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC) There is a small but distinct lean to the right. In some cases, I find that alternately applying small vertical PC and rotation while viewing at 100% does the trick. --Tagooty 02:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC) @Tagooty: Thanks for the suggestion, that helps! I've uploaded a new version, rotated 0.3° and -1 in vertical, how's that? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 18:28, 20 August 2022 (UTC) could be more sharp? --Ezarate 18:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC) @Ezarate: Sharpening turned up a bit, more starts adding noise in the sky. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:32, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments idem another --Ezarate 18:32, 20 August 2022 (UTC) @Ezarate: per previous. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:32, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Travessia Santos-Guarujá 2018 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 08:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Salisbury versus Canterbury

Sorry, but there is a little problem with your images in the Category:Monument to Giles de Bridport, Salisbury Cathedral: this monument is in the Canterbury Cathedral, not in Salisbury. I propose to you to amend this mistake. Best Szilas (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Awfully sorry, my mistake. Szilas (talk) 13:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torr Righ and King's Cave trail, Arran 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It isn't clear to me what I'm looking at, but it doesn't look like a trail --Poco a poco 12:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the comment, I've clarified the description, does that help? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC) Yes, that's better in terms of composition but I'd then have to ask to id those plants if they are the main subject... --Poco a poco 10:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: I'm a photographer, not a botanist, sorry! Thanks. Mike Peel 18:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC) Same apply to most of us....User:Robert Flogaus-Faust can you help out here? --Poco a poco 17:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)  Info The plant with pink flowers is Armeria maritima. The rest of the organisms looks like various kinds of lichen, even though I am not sure about the greyish stuff. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC) Thanks for the ID! I've added the plant category, and moved to 'unidentified lichens'. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

New user

Gooday Mike - a new user is showing admin rights box at Koala Wiki if you would do the necesssary. S/he has rebuked me at En wiki so it's better that an admin removes the userbox. Thnk.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Icod de los Vinos 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments cropped building on left --Charlesjsharp 15:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: Cropped, does that look better now? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC) Yes, much better, thanks. Charlesjsharp 17:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: Thanks, will you come back here for a decision? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 18:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Is there a feature in WD that allows storage of small icons representing patterns and colors of used on french geological maps.

Hi Mike

At the end of this discussion, Billinghurst suggests that I could contact you for having some advices for a possible use of WD in order to avoid downloadding of hundred small icons in Commons (what I did in Commons seems to be not really suitable).

First, let me give you the background of this request:

Within the "French Communes" project in WP-fr, we have drawn many geological maps and use them to illustrate the geology section of the commune. To that, I add a table thats gives the geology of the commune according to the geological time scale ; with for each geological formation : the name of the formation preceded by small colored squares with sometimes patterns that correspond to the different areas of the maps. Here is an example: [2]

All data (maps, legends, patterns and colors) come from the open data of the French geology institution (aka BRGM). We use a geographic information system (QGIS) to drawn the maps and also to extract the colors and the patterns wich represent the various geological layer in the maps. After some developments, I generate small SVG files for each geological formations and use Pattypan to upload these file in Commons [3], [4],... Then some WP-fr models I've developped allow the matching between the geological notation of a formation to its name and its colored-pattern.

Now, what is the probem:

Sometimes the BRGM uses the same colors/patterns for 2 or more geological formations. I don't know that in advance. The consequence is that generates duplicated files in Commons. According to Wikimedia/Commons rules, this should be avoided. One solution is to create redirections for duplicate files. Another solution is to delete all duplicates. But that creates a lot of red links in WP-fr (file does'nt exist any more).

Billinghurst thinks there might be a solution with WD to draw and use all those small colorful patterns. What do you think ? Poudou99 (talk) 20:50, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

@Poudou99: My first thought was that you could do this in css, like this:

however reading more, I see you also have patterns? Does each type of material have a Wikidata item already? If so, you could use icon (P2910), and fetch it like this (example from Former Line 51 Amstelveenlijn (Amsterdam) (Q606629)):

My worries would be that the QID numbers would be basically random (can you easily do a look-up table to convert from terrain type to corresponding QID?), and whether the Wikidata items would be notable enough (do they already exist as items? can they be well-referenced? see d:Wikidata:Notability). Thoughts? Personally, I suspect that creating file redirects would be the simplest way to go. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 05:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Mike

Thank you for your reply

There is a point i forgot to say to Billinghurst :

The data are provided for each French department. A dataset contains the complete geological map of one department. The colors and patterns are valid for the entire department only. For historical reasons, colors and patterns are not always the same from one department to another. That explains why there are several categories containing the SVG files (one category per departement). And explains also why there are dupplicated files not only inside one category but accros several categories. And potentially a large amount of redirections to create manually after removing duplicates files

However, there is something that is valid for all of France: the notation of the geological formation. It's a kind of key that indicates the geological period, the epoch and the sub-epoch where the formation appeared. For example :

• g1-2b : geological formation from Rupelian stage to Chattian stage (Oligocene epoch)
• c5b  : geological formation from Campanian stage (Late Cretaceous epoch)
• h5 : geological formation from Stephanian stage (late Carboniferous epoch)

And these notations suffixed by the department numbers allow to generate the unique SVG file names and could act as main key in WD.

Regarding patterns:

Indeed, half of SVG files are patterns. These patterns indicate that the geological formations contain additional elements:

•  : meaning the presence of mud
•  : meaning the presence of peat dating from the Würm ice age
•  : meaning Limestone and sandstone shales dating from the Early Jurassic period

The BRGM supplies a library of basic patterns (black and white). There are about hundred different basic patterns. For each geological formation, we have a pattern number, a color and a rotation angle associated to the formation. And thus this allows me to generate automatically all final SVG files for all formations in a department [5], [6]

I don't know how I could do this with WD. --Poudou99 (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

@Poudou99: Sounds complicated. I think redirects are the easiest way forward. Alternatively you could somehow do a lookup table in your code, maybe? But I can't see how this could work in Wikidata, sorry. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2021 1904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2021 1015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Arqueológico Belmaco 2020 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa El Sauzal 2020 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2022 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Biddulph Grange 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2021 0164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It is necessary to rotate the img at least -1.30 Terragio67 21:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC) @Terragio67: Rotated until horizon is flat, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:43, 29 August 2022  Support Yes, good quality. --Terragio67 07:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2021 0165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It is necessary to rotate the img at least -1.45 Terragio67 21:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC) @Terragio67: Rotated until horizon is flat, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:43, 29 August 2022  Support Slightly blurred on the top, but IMHO: good quality. --Terragio67 07:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universal Studios Hollywood 2012 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 22:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:At New York, USA 2017 168.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Arqueológico Belmaco 2020 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 20:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griffith Observatory 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Adeje 2020 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 1012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks random to me, both the tilt and the chunk of roof --Poco a poco 20:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review. I've removed the tilt (although it was natural - see the previous nom), and that's also removed the roof, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 22:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 14:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2021 1277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 20:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! High Line, New York 2012 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment some chromanoise on the dark parts. probably fixable. --MB-one 19:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC) @MB-one: Thanks for the review, I've tweaked it, not sure I can do much more though, ISO was a bit high. Thanks. Mike Peel 20:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)  Support The chromatic noise is almost gone. Good enough for me --MB-one 17:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Pi bot added a duplicate wikidata infobox template

I had already added it to Category:AT&T Picturephone but it looks like the bot failed to recognize it and added a second one for some reason https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:AT%26T_Picturephone&diff=686518557&oldid=686463108 DogsRNice (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Election

Hope you win. I voted for you. Krok6kola (talk) 16:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the University of São Paulo 2017 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hassop station and nearby 2017 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too tight crop on the left, can you offer more? --Poco a poco 21:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review. Unfortunately not much, as I think I was avoiding people to the left - I've uploaded the version without perspective correction. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Ok, better --Poco a poco 07:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:31, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

PiBot

See: Category:Edward Young Clarke PiBot is adding a second infobox because another bot has not converted Template:WI to Template:Wikidata_Infobox yet. Any suggestions to remedy? RAN (talk) 06:57, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

leave it a day, pi bot should come back and tidy up. I’ll see if I can optimize the process at some point, but I’m mostly offline for the next week. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Yes I've noticed this annoying new development. Previously PiBot would simply "tidy up" by converting {{WI}} to {{Wikidata Infobox}}. Now it adds a duplicate template, then corrects it after a couple days. Not the end of the world, but still annoying for humans. --Animalparty (talk) 19:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), Animalparty, and DogsRNice: OK, this should be fixed now - for some reason the script that converts uses of redirects to the main template call was only running twice-weekly, it now runs daily before the bot adds new infoboxes. I'm puzzled why this came up while I was on vacation, since it seems to have been that way for a while, but anyway: it's now improved. Please let me know if you spot the bot doing this behaviour again in the future! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks! Was it you that developed the Wikidata Infobox? --RAN (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
  • @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Yes. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill at Calle Isla De Montaña Clara 2022 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill at Calle Isla De Montaña Clara 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 20:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill at Calle General Moscardol 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palomar Observatory 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Terragio67 20:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill at Calle Isla De Montaña Clara 2022 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality, but 2 dust spots left & right of wings --Virtual-Pano 23:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC) @Virtual-Pano: Thanks for the review, dust spots removed, if I missed any could you highlight them? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality after cleanup --Virtual-Pano 07:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill at Calle Isla De Montaña Clara 2022 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality but dust spot in upper left part --Virtual-Pano 23:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC) @Virtual-Pano: Thanks for the review, dust spot removed. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 18:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support just there - a higher f-number will give you more DoF --Virtual-Pano 07:10, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salinas de Janubio 2022 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill in El Cotillo 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 23:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salinas de Janubio 2022 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palomar Observatory 2012 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2020 1011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Los Gigantes 2022 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but there is some purple CA --Poco a poco 08:12, 21 September 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, there was definitely CA in the 1st version I uploaded, but I thought the 2nd fixed it? Can you point out an area where there's still an issue please? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)  Support I see some remains but I guess that I can categorize it in the pixelpeeping category --Poco a poco 10:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Vertical perspective distortion, fixable? --F. Riedelio 10:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Thanks for the review! New version with tweaked perspective uploaded, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Teguise 2022 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 21:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill in El Cotillo 2022 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:34, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill in El Cotillo 2022 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 20:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Las Palmas 2022 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill in El Cotillo 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The crop on the left is a bit distracting. Maybe crop it a little bit more? --Satdeep Gill 06:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC) @Satdeep Gill: Thanks for the review, I've cropped it as you suggest. Thanks. Mike Peel 19:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Las Palmas 2022 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 06:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill in El Cotillo 2022 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but there is a slight cw tilt --Poco a poco 08:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review! Tweaked so that things are horizontal/vertical, although I'm not sure if that was the right direction? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC) Look at the buildings on the left, they are tilted in cw direction, it got worse now --Poco a poco 10:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks, rotated in the opposite direction now! Thanks. Mike Peel 10:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Teguise 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 09:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Teguise 2022 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 09:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Croome Park 2022 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, very pretty light. --Trougnouf 00:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seal in Morrow Bay 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 10:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OVRO 40m telescope 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 10:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fundación César Manrique 2022 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although it does look a bit weird with those leaning lamp posts in the background on the right. --Peulle 12:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:02, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support May be a bit blur. But not so bad. --Sebring12Hrs 08:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CARMA 2012 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OVRO 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 10:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Trentham Estate 2022 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Capri, KCH 205V, Lincoln Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Monkey Forest 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 17:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs perspective correction. --Sebring12Hrs 11:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Perspective tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Pi bot has stopped adding wikidata infoboxes on 10th of September

Hello Mike,

it seems, that Pi bot has stopped adding wikidata infoboxes on 10th of September:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&end=&namespace=all&start=&tagfilter=&target=Pi+bot&offset=20220910050723&limit=500

Thanks a lot! M2k~dewiki (talk) 08:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

@M2k~dewiki: Thanks for pointing that out! I've tracked it back to database changes in MediaWiki, which means the SQL to select candidates to add the infobox to is no longer working. I don't know how to fix it, so I've raised it on Phabricator at phab:T320314. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

@M2k~dewiki: Running again now! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Interwiki from wikidata

Hi Mike, when I had a look at phab:T320314 Category:Mandolins popped up. A long time ago my bot added {{Interwiki from wikidata}}. Maybe good to replace these with {{Wikidata Infobox}}? Not sure how many cases we actually have. Oh btw, is a funny edit. Multichill (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

@Multichill: Pi bot should do that change... Looking at the query results, Category:Mandolins is in the list, so let's see if Pi bot gets it during this run, otherwise I'll check the code. With the funny edit, the code doesn't look for comment strings, those have to be manually fixed at the moment. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

@Multichill: OK, there was a bug in the code that meant it didn't add the infobox if, for example, 'see cat' was included in the text, now fixed, and re-running. Thanks for pointing out Category:Mandolins! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliant Scimitar, TXG 771M, Lincoln Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliant Scimitar, TXG 771M, Lincoln Castle 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ice cream van DWM 698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mississippi Voyager 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 06:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaguar Mk2, 873 BCJ, Lincoln Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 20:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bond Bug, CAC 414J, Lincoln Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trentham Monkey Forest 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea lions at Pier 39 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could be sharper, but I think this is sharp enough to promote, and these huge animals are cute when they're asleep. -- Ikan Kekek 00:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG, MFE 126H, Lincoln Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:09, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At USP 2018 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At USP 2018 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Virgin Cathedral (San Francisco, California), 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mississippi Voyager 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:28, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huntington Gardens 18 - Echinocactus grusonii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 14:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huntington Gardens 19 - Echinocactus grusonii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 14:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tree fungus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VanNess Ave & Market Street 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs perspective correction. Look at the horizon. --Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Perspective tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, Horizon is ok, but not the buildings. They are completly leaning on. --Sebring12Hrs 11:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: I tried again, how is that? Thanks. Mike Peel 14:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Castillo de San Gabriel 2022 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs perspective correction. --Sebring12Hrs 11:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Perspective tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, but not enough to me. Look at the buildings. --Sebring12Hrs 11:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: I tried again, how is that? Thanks. Mike Peel 14:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 14:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huntington Gardens 12 - Mammillaria humboldtii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salinas de Janubio 2022 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oasis Whinfell Forest 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side is tilted --Poco a poco 22:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, I've rotated it a bit, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)  Comment Without prejudice to your dialogue about rotation, my comment is that in the future, if you could get the building sharper and have wider crops on the left and right, you might be able to shoot an FP. Some of your photos are a little borderline for QI to me because they're not that sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 08:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Not perfect (I think that a bit of perspective correction would have been required) but close enough. Otherweise, I agree with Ikan's comment. --Poco a poco 15:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackpool Corporation Transport No. 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Estação Júlio Prestes 2018 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The last pile is lezning a bit too. --Sebring12Hrs 11:43, 9 October 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackpool Corporation Transport No. 166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Powis Castle 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Powis Castle 2016 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 14:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teide National Park 2022 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The first metalic pile is leaning a bit to right. --Sebring12Hrs 11:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC) @Sebring12Hrs: Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)  Support I think I am too much strict about nominations in QI candidate list. When I see the other promotions, I can see problems, but the pictures still have a good overall quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)