Pom²

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center]]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevilla cathedral - tomb of christopher columbus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Certainly QI --Massimo Catarinella 16:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Albi

I'm very jealous of what you've done in Albi! I remember having a terrible time with my camera in this dark cathedral :-) --Eusebius (talk) 08:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

• Thx :) That's true lack of light was a big problem, plus artficials ones can cause big flare / clipping. With some shots with 10sec + exposure, a good tripod can help --Pom² (talk) 12:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
  • I didn't have a tripod at the time, unfortunately. But now I have one and... I'll be back. Some day. --Eusebius (talk) 12:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albi cathedral - vault detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very impressive image. You've done an excellent job capturing the detail. --J.smith 00:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albi cathedral - choir and choir screen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fascinant. Techniquement bon. Albertus teolog 21:46, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ronda panoramic view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunming image. Nice job. Elucidate 18:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Ronda panoramic view.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ronda panoramic view.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Albi cathedral - choir and choir screen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Albi cathedral - choir and choir screen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 09:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

KlausenpassPano.jpg

I'm not so good at editing pictures. Maybe you can do it or tell me somebody who can do it.
thanks --D-Kuru (talk) 08:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

FPC

Oh, ok, sorry about this. Maybe I shouldn't close them =(. – Jerry^teps 10:31, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile d'Albi (exterior).

review

•  Info Picture by Pom². --Eusebius (talk) 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

 Support Very good shot. Albertus teolog (talk) 09:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile d'Albi (interior).

review

•  InfoPicture by Pom². --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  SupportAfter comparing I now think this illustrats the subject better --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support You cannot support your own nomination! Fortunately, I can :-) --Eusebius (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Albi cathedral - innver view.jpg: 0
2. Albi cathedral - choir and choir screen.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Albi cathedral - innver view.jpg: Declined.
File:Albi cathedral - choir and choir screen.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Eusebius (talk) 12:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

close FP

Hi, according to timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting), it is listed that "Wed 28 Jan → Fri 06 Feb". It is better to close the voting tomorrow( 07 Feb). Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 22:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

• I always proceed like that, I close vote according to each image timer --Pom² (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vitrail cathédrale Saint-Étienne,Toulouse.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vitrail cathédrale Saint-Étienne,Toulouse.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 10:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Your vote on my nomination

Hi Pom², You opposed my nomination with the reaon "no value" [[1]]. You are mistaken. The image has great EV. Please take a look w:Refraction and w:Lens (optics). The image, which is used in the articles is FP on English Wikipedia and is used in 2 more articles, but the resolution was too low for Commons FP, so I took another image. May I please ask you to revisit the nomination and change your oppose reason? Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 12:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Joan_Miro_vitrail.jpg

File:Joan_Miro_vitrail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cameta (talk) 22:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Choeur Cathédrale Albi

Salut,

je viens de télécharger une photo du choeur de la cathédrale d'albi et ai vu que tu as une photo similaire qui est FP, valued image et QI.

Je voudrais remplacer ton image par la mienne. Elle n'est pas beaucoup plus détaillée, mais je trouve qu'elle a des couleurs plus réalistes (la tienne est trop bleue) et je préfère le point de vue. (j'ai vu que j'avais voté contre sa promotion FP, un peu trop tard). C'est bien sûr subjectif.

Je ne demande pas la "permission", mais préfère te le faire savoir, et avoir ton avis. Je ferai les changements sur les articles lorsque j'aurais travaillé toutes mes photos de la cathédrale. j'ai du boulot ;).

Benh (talk) 10:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Granada_cathedral

Dear Pom², I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catedral_de_Granada#/media/File:Granada_cathedral_-_capilla_mayor.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 14:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 14:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Permission to Use Your Photo

Dear Pom², publishing house is preparing a book including collected papers concerning medieval art. The book is a scholarly publication prepared according to guidelines of scholarly writing. In a paper concerning the iconography of medieval art we would like to use your photo “Basilique Saint-Sernin, bas reliefs.jpg”. Your photo is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 licence, but we would like to know whether it is possible to obtain your permission for using it in printed book. Could you please contact publishing house by writing an e-mail at irsa@irsa.com.pl? Kind regards, --Artibusethistoriae (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)