Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Tuvalkin

ExtinctsEdit

Category:Bricked_up_doorsEdit

Ies (talk) 11:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

File:U kun hoketo 1.svgEdit

Saluton,

vi forprenis de la bildo File:U kun hoketo 1.svg la kategorion Unicode 0300-036F Combining Diacritical Marks kaj aldonis Diacritic entering through keyboard, skribante

  • Tamen jes: ĝi bonege ilustras la funkciadon de t.n. seka klavo (kaj cetere ĝi ne rilatas al kodigo: pribildigo de "Unicode canonical decomposition" bezonus malan sagon.

Unue, la kodopunkto U+0306 estas en la bloko Combining Diacritical Marks (U+0300 – U+036F), do mi ne komprenas kiel ĝi ne povas esti en la precize samnoma kategorio. Per la sago → mi volis diri ke la kombino de la kodoj U+0075 kaj U+0306 (ekzemple en dosiero) rezultigas prezentadon de „u“ (ekzemple sur ekrano), kodebla ankaŭ kiel U+0160. Mi konsentas ke ankaŭ duflanka sago ↔ estus ebla. Pri „regula unikoda malkompono“ (Unicode canonical decomposition) mi nenion diris; jes, tiuokaze la sago estu inversa.

Due, klavaroj ne uzas Unikodon por komuniki al komputiloj, sed specialajn klavarkodojn. Do la kodoj de la „kombiniĝantaj simboloj“ ne estas uzataj por realigi mortajn (aŭ sekajn) klavojn. Krome, la mortaj klavoj ĉiam estas puŝataj antaŭ la normalaj, do la hoketo devus tiam esti antau la „u“.

Se vi insistas, bone, lasu la kategorion Diacritic entering through keyboard (kvankam mi opinias ĝin erara), sed bonvolu lasi ankaŭ Unicode 0300-036F Combining Diacritical Marks, kiun plene trafas la bildo.

-- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Koncerne klavarenigo, vi pravas pri tio ke klavaroj ne signalas unikode, sed ne tion mi celis: Mi diris ke la diagramo bone pribildas la koncepton de “seka klavo” = senpaŝa klavo (senkonsidere pri la mekanismo, eĉ povus temi pri mekanika skribmaŝino). Aliflanke, kiel vi prave atentigas, mi eraris pri tio, ĉar ja la sekan klavon oni surtajpu unue kaj poste sur ĝin la bazliteron, ne male. Do vi pravas ke via bildo ne taŭgas en Category:Diacritic entering through keyboard (malkrom se ekzistas iu vaste uzata klavareniga reĝimo kiu permesas logikordan enigon de diakritoj — mi konas kelkajn sed nure eksperimentajn).
-- Tuválkin 15:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

U+AC00–U+D7AFEdit

There was a diff 3 years ago, and you might have improvements since, but anyway… these characters are Hangŭl. This script is no more Chinese than Latin is runic. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

  • You’re right and I was wrong. Annyoing, too, since this is a subject I think is very important and on I’m knowledgeable about more than average. Thanks for fixing. -- Tuválkin 22:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

A third-party opinion neededEdit

Hello. There is a discord about linguistical aspects of {{original upload date}}. Could you look here? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Sorry, my level of Russian is way too puny for this. -- Tuválkin 23:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Problem with a userEdit

Dear Tuválkin, , Túrelio, Guanaco, and Jeff, I'm contacting you today because you helped me greatly last september, when I had a problem with an admin, and I feel the communication is fine with you. Since this bad experience (I was nearly blocked for a totally unfair reason), I've lived in peace until recently and became an active member in the QI and FP sections. Many of my photos have been promoted, and I enjoy talking with most of the other members there. Unfortunately I have a trouble now with the user Colin. See this page Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Evolution of a Tornado.jpg. That person will end up with exceeding me soon if he continues to twist my words and make me look like a trash. I try to stay mellow, but it's difficult, and too much is too much. I've never insulted anyone, but Colin alleges such mistake, and of course because he's Scottish he speaks much better English than me, to be able to transform my comments. Thus, if ever anyone of you had a hint to resolve the comunication problem, through the complexity of the discussion. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Dear @Basile Morin: good luck with that issue, that’s my sincere desire. Sadly, I cannot help you. I’m not an admin (not I want to ever be), I don’t have any interest nor experience in the QI/FP area (frankly seems to be too much drama for what’s worth, and clearly one bit of Commons activity that could be taken elsewhere, like Flickr, with no losses for anyone), and, most importantly, I have no constructive suggestions about dealing with Colin. There were maybe 3 or 4 occasions ever when I managed to interact with him normally; all other times it has been nothing by fruitless, inexplainable conflict. I hope you’ll find a way to deal with the matter. -- Tuválkin 00:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks a lot, Tuválkin, for your constructive answer. I also got nice hints from other people, then now I see better what to do (or not to do) with Colin. All of them share the same feeling which you expresses here of a conflictual mentality. Agree also with your impression of "too much drama for what's worth", although it's disturbing to work in an oppressive context, and as a user new in activity here, I also try to find efficient ways to solve such kind of issues, without making too much waves. Apart from that, I totally respect your desinterest for the QI/FP area, and am aware how useful you are elsewhere. Just for me this area is really great, very interesting, and not only constructive for myself but also for Commons. As for example I wouldn't have uploaded so many files about Laos (where I live), now used in Wikipedia, without this emulating and rewarding section. Just my feedback. So, well, enjoy your job where it is, no worry, it will be fine I think -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

RequestEdit

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Portuguese?

   Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 12:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Sure:
   Bélgica: Na região flamenca faz-se ocasionalmente dobragem/dublagem no dialeto local; em geral faz-se apenas legendagem. Na região francófona e na região germanófona faz-se sempre dobragem/dublagem com elenco completo, tanto para filmes como para séries de televisão.
-- Tuválkin 23:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
  • @A2D2: After I made the translation 1st thing after logging in and seeing your request, I checked the images and found out that the requested translation was already done by someone else, rendering my effort moot. A few clicks show me that you had made the same identical request to no less than four Portuguese-speaking fellow users, causing up to three of us to utterly waste our time. Please do not contact me again. -- Tuválkin 23:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Tuvalkin".