User talk:Uoaei1/Archive04

FP candidate list

With respect to your comment,please look at the picture at full resolution before saying it is not sharp. With respect to the noise, there is only a red fish in a dark setting!!. I think this picture by you is much more noisy! --Gronk (talk) 16:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maria Laach Kirche Gnadenbild 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Laach Kirche Gnadenbild 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traunsteinera globosa Mitterbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Rethink more! --Hubertl 19:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschachwald Wegkapelle 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis paphia auf Centaurea jacea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veratrum album Mitterbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschachwald Heustadel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wörschachwald Heustadel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grimming von Wörschachwald 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Yes, it´s better now. --Hubertl 19:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliosperma alpestre Gemeindealpe 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mond Seckau 20151023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariazellerbahn Himmelstreppe St. Pölten 20150711.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Paris Notre-Dame East View 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paris Notre-Dame East View 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscher Südseite 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliosperma alpestre Ötschergräben 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariazellerbahn Himmelstreppe Erlaufklause 20150712.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Argynnis paphia auf Centaurea jacea 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Argynnis paphia auf Centaurea jacea 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötschergräben Schleierfall 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquilegia vulgaris Gemeindealpe 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötschergräben Schleierfall 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support But there's a tiny little bit of CA at the branches at the top of the image. Could you please fix this? --Code 06:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)  Done CA corrected --Uoaei1 07:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak lens sharpness in the corners but overall good quality. --Code 06:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthericum ramosum Ötschergräben 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laon Cathedral Vaults 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laon Cathedral Vaults 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anthericum ramosum Ötschergräben 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Gonates Cave 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schinaria Beach Panorama 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 16:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Micro Ammoudi Beach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 16:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nano Ammoudi Beach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nano Ammoudi Beach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Traunsteinera globosa Mitterbach 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Traunsteinera globosa Mitterbach 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schinaria Beach Panorama 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros Sunset 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kourtaliotiko Gorge 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia ficus-indica fruits Crete 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thronos Naos Panagias 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kourtaliotiko Gorge 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kourtaliotiko Gorge 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thronos Naos Panagias 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Plakias Gonates Cave 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plakias Gonates Cave 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thronos Naos Panagias 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thronos Naos Panagias 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Asomaton 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Asomaton 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little more contrast to some more depth, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Asomaton 41.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agia Anna Fresco 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agia Anna Fresco 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wagrain Grießenkareck N-Panorama 20160130.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments excellent resolution. good colors. --Themidget17 21:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thronos and Psiloritis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agia Anna Fresco 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:09, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agia Anna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, a Q1one --Michielverbeek 20:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psiloritis view from Thronos 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros Ekklisia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special atmosphere.--Famberhorst 06:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Psiloritis view from Monastiraki 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agios Ioannis o Theologos 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agios Ioannis o Theologos 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agios Ioannis o Theologos 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo and obvious enough Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amari Agios Ioannis o Theologos 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --A.Savin 14:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wagrain Grießenkareck N-Panorama 20160130.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wagrain Grießenkareck N-Panorama 20160130.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For providing many awesome images to commons Domdomegg (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schinaria Beach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough, just a good photo, a Q1one --Michielverbeek 09:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Beach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Amari Agia Anna Fresco 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amari Agia Anna Fresco 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Bay Sunset 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olea europaea Preveli 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Megalopotamos Bridge 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larix decidua Seckau 20151024 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olea europaea Preveli 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schinaria Goat Heads 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sonntagberg Basilika Deckenfresken 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Ost+Nordflügel 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Ost+Nordflügel 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckauer Tauern 20151024 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larix decidua Seckau 20151024 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckauer Tauern 20151024 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckauer Tauern 20151024 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros Sunset 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Beach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Church 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Madlhof und Kühberger 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wagrain Winterwald 20160205 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful motive. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sybrita Archaeological Site Building A1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stössing Hochstrass Panorama 20150913.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sybrita Archaeological Site Building 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochkönig vom Grießenkareck 20260130.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wagrain Winterwald 20160205 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gleinalpe von Seckau Sonnwenddorf 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:54, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischofsmütze vom Grießenkareck 20260130.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sybrita Archaeological Site Building A2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Cccefalon 05:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maria Taferl Basilika Langhausfresko 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Taferl Basilika Langhausfresko 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Altenburg Krypta 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Altenburg Krypta 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semmering Adlitzgraben 20150919.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aesculus hippocastanum Seckau 20151024.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros Wayside Cross 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monsieur d'Aubergine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Idea is better as the sharpness on top, but ok for me... --Hubertl 10:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Semmering Klamm 20150919.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quercus robur St. Marein 20151026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Anzbach Neujahrs-Feuerwerk 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South View 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:16, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Libyan Sea 20150826 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpinus betulus Knospe 20160403.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Libyan Sea 20150826 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussilago farfara 20160403 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 05:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Notre-Dame South View 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 05:36, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoenix theophrasti Plakias 20150825.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potami Dam Reservoir 20150829.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Libyan Sea 20150826 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:19, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros Chapel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pancratium maritimum Plakias Beach 20150825.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larix decidua Seckau 20151024 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olea europaea Thronos 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros Sunset 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussilago farfara 20160403 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SAplants 18:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussilago farfara 20160403 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SAplants 18:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Uhrmacherkeusche 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Uhrmacherkeusche 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lainzer Tiergarten 20160430 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timios Stavros Ekklisia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lainzer Tiergarten 20160430 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St. Pölten Dom Hochaltar 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Pölten Dom Hochaltar 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potentilla erecta Ötschergräben 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 20:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Servus Uoaei1,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie  ^Disk    15:07, 5 May 2016 (CET)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laon Porte d'Ardon 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laon Porte d'Ardon 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Beautiful work!

I feel like I'm there in the forest. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilstein Arnstein-Nadel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilstein 20160507 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allium ursinum Blüte 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilstein Wanderweg 20160507 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilstein Arnstein-Nadel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilstein Wanderweg 20160507 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Was so naturliebende Sportkletterer alles anrichten können vor lauter Begeisterung, endlich zum Einstieg zu kommen. Asche auch über mein Haupt. --Hubertl 10:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilstein Wanderweg 20160507 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark in places, but overall good light control in difficult conditions. QI for me. --Peulle 23:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peilstein Weide 20160507.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak pro, you can see, that with this lens at 19mm you don´t get enough sharpness. A third opinion si highly appreciated --Hubertl 10:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsteinhöhle 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Hubertl 12:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringsee Panorama 20160527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice, hight quality--Lmbuga 19:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringsee Kapelle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringsee gegen Nordwesten 20160527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringsee Kapelle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringsee Kapelle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Peilstein 20160507 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peilstein 20160507 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stössing Hochstrass Wiese 20160521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiana acaulis Seckau 20160528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulsatilla alpina subsp. austriaca Seckau 20160528 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulsatilla alpina subsp. austriaca Seckau 20160528 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringsee Anlandungszone 20160527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringbach 20160527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 15:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dianthus carthusianorum Neulengbach 20160611 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems a little auro to sit in the flower, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingeringsee gegen Südosten 20160527 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seckau Hochalm 20160528 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Marein bei Knittelfeld Kastanienallee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa canina Neulengbach 20160611 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)