User talk:Xicotencatl/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Vancouver 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me! --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:48, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Street 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nitobe Garden UBC 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nitobe Garden UBC 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nitobe Garden UBC 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose Garden UBC 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose Garden UBC 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose Garden UBC 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose Garden UBC 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asian Center UBC.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great picture of a building in its natural environment. Perhaps one stop more exposure, but that's a trifle --Daniel Case 18:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose Garden UBC 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Street Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Bank Building Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Another great job --Daniel Case 02:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Bank Building Vancouver 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great angle without perspective issues --Daniel Case 02:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Bank Building Vancouver 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail; no perspective problems --Daniel Case 02:56, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Square Vancouver 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Cordova Street Vancouver 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Square Vancouver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterfront Station Vancouver 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Pender Street 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 438 West Pender Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seymour Building Vancouver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bold perspective, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:38, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Bank Chambers Vancouver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seymour Building Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 16:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinclair Centre Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Doesn't seem to have any perspective problems, reasonably in focus --Daniel Case 05:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodwards Building Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 23:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominion Building Vancouver 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments no correction needed. --Ralf Roletschek 22:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Bank Chambers Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 432 West Hastings Street.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver Gastown 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominion and Woodwards Buildings Vancouver.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasp nest in front of Dominion Building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment tighter framing? --SkywalkerPL 22:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)  Comment SkywalkerPL, I tried to fix the perspective in the other files, but is impossible to get all the lines vertical without too much distortion. I like the framing in this particular picture, I tightened it but I think it looks better like this. --Xicotencatl 23:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC) Support visually a good image though somewhat overexposed IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC) Thanks, I decreased the Exposure. --Xicotencatl 07:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodward's Building Vancouver 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woodwards Building Vancouver.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Shore Mountains 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegian Sun Vancouver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominion Building Vancouver 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 02:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver urban decay.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norwegian Sun Vancouver 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominion Building Vancouver 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dominion Building Vancouver 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But there is a strange object in the sky, can you identify it? --Code 07:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC) It's a bird, most likely a seagull. It's definitely not a camera dust spot. --Xicotencatl 07:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carter Cotton Building.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs a bit exposure reducing and right rotating. --Hockei 17:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)  Done--Xicotencatl 07:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)  Not done The left side of the building is still leaning out. Exposure is OK now. --Hockei 14:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, I could not fix this. Thanks for the review. --Xicotencatl 06:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC) It's back, thanks for the help Hockei. --Xicotencatl 06:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)  Neutral Maybe anybody else can review it. Because of my own editing (vertical correction and exposure) I don't vote for it. --Hockei 12:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Support Busy, but good enough for QI.--Jebulon 14:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective improvable, but ok --Poco a poco 18:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me even though I suggest little noise reduction on the brick walls; maybe you could find some words about the steamclock? --Isiwal 19:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gastown-12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 23:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry Blossoms UBC 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robson Square Vancouver 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 22:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robson Square Vancouver 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cherry Blossoms UBC.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - focused in the centre. --Peulle 14:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burrard Station 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marine Drive Cherry Blossoms 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island Vancouver 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island Vancouver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island Vancouver 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ocean Concrete 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Peulle 14:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Island Vancouver 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it's tilted CCW. --XRay 13:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Better now? --Xicotencatl 08:45, 13 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment I don't know how to say ... IMO it's now tilted CW. --XRay 12:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Last try. It may not be possible to get a good perspective on this though. --Xicotencatl 06:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Support Good try. IMO acceptable for QI. --XRay 06:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granville Street Bridge 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burrard Bridge 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 01:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)