Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Römerberg Frankfurt abends.jpg

File:Römerberg Frankfurt abends.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2011 at 21:43:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 21:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 21:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very well done. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Photography is an art . As art forms, each is a product of the artist's imagination and taste . I support. -- aghith 06:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ☭Acodered (talk) 07:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ein sehr, sehr ordentliches Bild. Schärfe ist gut, kein nennenswertes Rauschen. Licht, na ja, blaue Stunde natürlich perfekt abgepasst. Aber dennoch vielleicht etwas spät, einige überbelichtete/aufgefressene Stellen und vor allem an den Dächern unterbelichtete Bereiche sind vorhanden. Der Himmel hat natürlich auch was, mit seiner deutlichen Bewegungsunschärfe, dennoch ist es ein bisschen viel obenherum, da würde ich persönlich etwas abschneiden. Ganz gerade stehen die Gebäude auch nicht, da sind noch minimale stürzende Linien vorhanden. Größtenteils beruht mein Contra jedoch auf den Geistern. Ja, ich weiß, du kannst da nur unwesentlich etwas dafür und an für sich stören mich diese Ghosts fast nie; in diesem Bild sind sie ziemlich extrem und auch ziemlich störend sowie verwirrend, sorry. Aber ich bin mir sicher, dass dieses Bild hier auch trotz meines Contras exzellent wird... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Was ist above geschrieben is very interessant, because it is a very careful review. Aber ich bin nicht sicher that everybody is able to verstehen. Vielleicht something in english could help other reviewers, Vielen Dank in advance... !--Jebulon (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wie kaʁstn. Especially the too prominent ghosts disturb the image. W.S. 19:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The review by kaʁstn is exemplary: detailed, balanced and correct - but perhaps a little bit too severe though. For me, only the two persons in front of the fountain are really disturbing: they are spoiling the image. Nevertheless, for the general quality I'd like to support this FP candidate. -- MJJR (talk) 19:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Je trouve ce ciel de très mauvais goût. -- Jamain (talk) 20:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lacking sharpness and overexposed.--Snaevar (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed. Steven Walling 23:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very difficult for a photographer. But the result was an unnatural side. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:07, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the sky and mood. Most of the time, ghosts will be an issue on busy places like this - Benh (talk) 18:27, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh! --mathias K 18:52, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 12:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:31, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nicolas17 (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Its very artistic. Azeri (talk) 14:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture