User talk:Aarp65/Archive 1

File:Schenkenzell Kirche St. Ulrich.jpg

Hallo Aarp65! Danke für dein Barnstar! Ich freue mich immer, wenn meine Bilder gefallen. Gruß --Harke (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Köln-Deutz April 2010 Panorama.jpg

Hello, browsing photos posted recently, I saw three of your photographs that could be assembled. Here is the result. I hope you agree.

Cordialement François de Dijon (talk) 09:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Köln-Deutz April 2010 Panorama.jpg

Thank You very much, cool work --Aarp65 (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

At your service. If you have others, it will be with pleasure. Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 13:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Bitte Bilder einsortieren

Hallo Aarp65, ich finde es klasse, dass du mithilfst Franken besser zu bebildern. Könntest du aber bitte deine Bilder auch gleich richtig in die Kategorien einsortiern? Die landen oft bei dir direkt unter der Ortschafts-kat auch wenn es bereits Unterseiten z.B. zu den Kirchen gibt. Ausserdem ist eine Doppelkat z.B. auf Ortschaft und building in ... nicht sonderlich sinnvoll. Ich schiebe schon weiter die Kats wenn ich darüber stosse, bitte dich aber das bei neuen Bildern gleich zu berücksichtigen. Gruss aus dem Nürnberger Land--Derzno (talk) 05:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis --Aarp65 (talk) 07:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Figurenpyramide Heilbronner Platz 02.JPG

Hallo Aarp65, diese Skulptur ist noch geschützt. Dein Foto ist dank der Panoramafreiheit völlig o.k., aber du musst den Namen des Bildhauers in der Beschreibung angeben. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Laut eines Buches von Elke Masa ist der Künstler unbekannt und da sie eher gründlich recherchiert, glaube ich nicht, dass ich einen möglichen Künstler herausfinden kann.

--Aarp65 (talk) 08:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Danke, wenn nicht bekannt bzw. am Kunstwerk nirgends angegeben, ist es so o.k. Denk bitte dran bei allen vermutlich noch geschützten Werken, die aber der Panoramafreiheit unterliegen, die Vorlage {{FoP-Germany}} gleich mit in die Beschreibung zu setzen. Weißt du zufällig wann dieser Georg Leistner vom Geiersbrunnen gestorben ist? --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Weiß ich leider nicht, nur dass in einigen Publikationen fälschlicherweise Heinrich Schwabe der Entwurf zugeschrieben und als Aufstellungsjahr des Geiersbrunnens 1860 genannt wird. --Aarp65 (talk) 23:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank...

... für das Lob. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your barnstar :-) Ludmiła Pilecka (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Danke!

Hallo Aarp65, danke für den Barnstar für die Spindelhemmung! Viele Grüße. --HNH (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Aarp65,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Dank

Hallo Aarp65, danke für deine Barnstar Anerkennung für meine Bilder.--Ginkgo2g (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Ebenfalls Dank

Hallo Aarp65, auch von mir herzlichen Dank für deine Barnstar Anerkennung für meine Bilder vom Lutherdenkmal. By the way, unlängst hat sogar ein Leipziger Verlag einige Bilder der Serie für eine Broschüre zum neuen Luther-Fernwanderweg benutzt.--Metilsteiner (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Ebenfalls Dank (auch !)

Hallo Aarp65, auch von mir herzlichen Dank für deine Barnstar Anerkennung für meine Bilder vom Rom !!!--Jebulon (talk) 10:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Ich schliesse mich dem Dank über die unerwartete Ehre sehr gerne an! --Parpan (talk) 14:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Dank, aber...

Thank You, but i'm sorry to say, that it is not my picture, - i've just tranfered it from German Wikipedia; The image is taken and edited by de:user:Caulobacter subvibrioides - 07:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC) - Nico-dk (talk) 07:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

In that case thanks for transferring it and not taking the credit for someone else's work! --Aarp65 (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Stern

Vielen Dank für den Stern für mein Bild aus Altötting. Das war mein erstes Qualitätsbild in Commons. Natürlich hat das Super-Wetter eine wichtige Rolle gespielt. Grüße, Aisano (talk) 14:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Stern

Hallo Aarp65, vielen Dank für den "Fotografenorden" für mein Bild vom Rathaus in Oschatz. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob ich das Lob verdient habe. Wenn ich mir die Bilder von anderen Usern betrachte hab ich da meine Zweifel, freue mich aber über die Blumen von Dir. Viele Grüße Radler59

Für mich war das Bild den Orden wert, sonst hätte ich ihn nicht vergeben, Gruß zurück und weiterhin glückliche Motivwahl--Aarp65 (talk) 01:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your barnstar.--Paulo RS Menezes (talk) 15:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Děkuji - Danke

Hallo, eine nette Überraschung. Ein altes Foto, ich habe auf Commons ein paar tausend ähnliche, aber trotzdem vielen Dank. Ich freue mich, dass meine Bilder sich gar jemand anschaut. Viele Grüsse aus Tschechien. --Palickap 06:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 06:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Stern / Panoramen

Hallo Aarp65! Erst mal vielen Dank für die zwei Sterne, die du auf meiner Diskussionsseite hinterlassen hast. Und ein großes Kompliment an dich, dass du offenbar auch auf anderen Diskussionsseite für eine positive Atmosphäre sorgst - da könnten sich einige äußerst kritische Geister eine Scheibe von abschneiden. Da du dich offenbar für Panoramen aus Mülheim interessierst kann ich dir noch folgende Dateien empfehlen:

• File:Berliner Platz Mülheim 2014.jpg
• File:Sunderplatz Mülheim Heimaterde 2014.jpg
• File:Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung S 2014.jpg
• File:Panorama Mülheim vom Rathausturm Richtung NW 2014.jpg

Eine Frage habe ich aber noch: Welchen Sinn hat eigentlich die Uhrzeit-Kategorisierung. Welchen Anwendungsfall gibt es für solche Kategorien? Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Bei Benutzung der Vorlage Benutzer:Knochen/Uhr wird auf der entsprechenden (Nutzer-)Seite die jeweils aktuelle Uhrzeit auf einem fotografierten Ziffernblatt angezeigt. --Aarp65 (talk) 20:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Stern

Hallo Aarp45,
ein ganz herzliches Dankeschön für den Fotografenstern. Ich freue mich sehr darüber, positive Kritik ist bei wiki ja leider nicht so häufig. Da ist dann so ein Stern eine schöne Überraschung! Danke nochmal! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 15:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Und auch vielen Dank für Alpirsbach! Frohe Weihnachten & schöne Feiertage wünscht --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 11:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die Reaktion und Wünsche für ein angenehmes Weihnachtsfest und einen glücklichen Jahreswechsel von mir zurück! --Aarp65 (talk) 18:29, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Tempus fugit

Herzlichen Dank an den fleißigen Sammler der Zeiten. :-) --I. Berger (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Nuremberg Palace of Justice

Hello Aarp65,

You might be interested to learn - if you haven't already - that your photo of the Nuremberg Palace of Justice ([1]) was used in this month's issue of Dutch legal magazine Ars Aequi. It was added to an article titled 'Judgment at Nuremberg' by Harmen van der Wilt, professor of international criminal law at the University of Amsterdam. The caption reads: 'Neurenberger Justizpalast (c) Aarp65'.

Kind regards,

Woodcutterty (talk) 09:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for this information,

Greetings back to You --Aarp65 (talk) 20:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the Brilliant Barnstar, re: Brooklyn Theatre fire

Apologies for my delayed response of some four hundred forty three days, but I haven't frequented here much lately. It is still appreciated, if belatedly. Take care. Garry R. Osgood (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Danke

Danke für den Fotografenorden. Freut mich das dir meine Bilder gefallen. Ein Dankeschön bekommt man bei Wikipedia ja leider nur selten, meistens wird eher gemeckert. Ich finde die Kirche aber auch besonders schön, und sie ist durch ihre freie und erhabene Lage gut zu fotografieren. Wenn ich mal Zeit habe (hoffentlich noch dieses Jahr) schreibe ich mal einen Artikel über diese Kirche. Herzliche Grüße, --Kirchenfan (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar

Many thanks for the barnstar.RSLlGriffith (talk)

You're welcome! Aarp65 (talk) 22:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Maritim Label Logo.jpg

File:Maritim Label Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

78.54.164.142 22:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Logo Casimirianum Coburg.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Casimirianum Coburg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo Casimirianum Coburg.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Martin K. (talk) 09:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Kickapoo Chiefs logo.jpg

File:Kickapoo Chiefs logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Revent^talk 01:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Frankenhalle.JPG

Servus! Du hast ein gelungenes Bild der Messehalle 7A eingestellt, als Name aber "Frankenhalle" gewählt. Das hat ein bisschen zu Verwirrung geführt. :-) Hast du ein Bild der echten Frankenhalle (Halle 11), das du an der gleichen Stelle hochladen könntest? Falls nicht, sollte man die Datei vielleicht umbenennen. Oder ich mach bei Gelegenheit selbst ein Foto. Viele Grüße --Lexikorn (talk) 14:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, wenn ich etwas Zeit habe, werde ich der Sache nachgehen. Oder Du kannst selbst einen geeigneteren Dateinamen wählen und die Bilddatei dahin verschieben. Aarp65 (talk) 16:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Altarbereich Allerheiligen Nürnberg.JPG

File:Altarbereich Allerheiligen Nürnberg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Heiligste Dreifaltigkeit Stadeln 04.JPG

File:Heiligste Dreifaltigkeit Stadeln 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Heiligste Dreifaltigkeit Stadeln 05.JPG

File:Heiligste Dreifaltigkeit Stadeln 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sankt Margaretha Heroldsberg September 2010 08.jpg

And also:

• File:Sankt Margaretha Heroldsberg September 2010 10.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Taufkapelle Allerheiligen Nürnberg.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Taufkapelle Allerheiligen Nürnberg.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 09:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Chickenexpress Logo.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Chickenexpress Logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chickenexpress Logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Surnames by ethnicity

Surnames by ethnicity has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

I know you created Category:Albanian surnames at least. --Ricky81682 (talk) 02:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Category:Ernst Dycke

Category:Ernst Dycke has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lantus (talk) 11:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht3.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht5.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht5.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht5.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht4.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht4.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht6.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht6.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht6.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht1.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, die Werke von Vera Macht sind noch bis Ende 2090 geschützt. Ihre Rechtserben müssten die freie Lizenz für diese Reproduktionen ihrer Werke gegenüber permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) bestätigen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vera macht7.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vera macht7.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vera macht7.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Quabius.jpg

And also:

• File:Quabius1.webp
• File:Quabius2.webp
• File:Quabius3.jpg
• File:Quabius4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magnus (talk) 14:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Vera Fedorenkova.jpg

And also:

• File:Vera Fedorenkova1.jpg
• File:Vera Fedorenkova2.jpg
• File:Vera Fedorenkova3.jpg
• File:Vera Fedorenkova4.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magnus (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Bartusch.jpg

File:Bartusch.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lantzsch3.jpg

File:Lantzsch3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lantzsch2.jpg

File:Lantzsch2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lantzsch1.jpg

File:Lantzsch1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lipsia4.jpg

File:Lipsia4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lipsia3.jpg

File:Lipsia3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lipsia2.jpg

File:Lipsia2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lipsia1.jpg

File:Lipsia1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Millbart (talk) 08:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lipsia.jpg

File:Lipsia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Frauenkopf von Arthur Zweiniger.jpg

File:Frauenkopf von Arthur Zweiniger.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Obvious copyvio, see upload comment. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Millbart (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Spengler.jpg

File:Spengler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Millbart (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Lipsia.jpg

File:Lipsia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Bistro f RIZZ Friedrich-Engels-Straße 12 Hohenstein-Ernstthal.jpg

File:Bistro f RIZZ Friedrich-Engels-Straße 12 Hohenstein-Ernstthal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:810A:9CBF:FC14:BC6F:88C8:1B45:162F 11:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Dintner.jpg

File:Dintner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lutheraner (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ELASKON logo.jpg

Copyright status: File:ELASKON logo.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ELASKON logo.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Hagen Bartusch

Category:Hagen Bartusch is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD C2 (unuseful empty category) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ ^{🩺 • 💉} 05:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Upch-logo.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Upch-logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Upch-logo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

LMLM (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)