User talk:Alexxx1979/Archive 1

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Derivative work to me

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gus-Khrustalny Crystal Museum The museum exposition IMG 9388 1725.jpg Sorry--Miguel Bugallo 11:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, derivative works--Miguel Bugallo 13:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Замечу ещё, что стеклянный букет уже свободный, создан в 1830 году (я увожу такие кадры в категорию). Вы можете проверить, есть ли на этих снимках предметы, которые уже вышли из охраны. А интерьер гостиной -- это копирайт музея, можно попросить у них лицензирование.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Очень хорошо, что вы пишете детали про названия экспонатов и время их создания. Это само по себе полезная и важная информация, а заодно она показывает, что экспонаты уже вышли из охраны копирайта.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Копирайт в музее

Кратко:

• OK Вещь, опубликованная до 1917 года — свободна.
• OK Вещь, автор которой умер больше 70 лет назад — свободна.
• OK Здание, автор которого умер больше 70 лет назад — свободное.
• Вещь или здание, автор которой умер после 1941 года — не свободны.
• Интерьер, построенный музейными сотрудниками — не свободен.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Petersburg Smolny Cathedral IMG 5855 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments With 2.1 MP close to the size limit. Slight perspective distortion. Apart from that good quality and nice image composition. --NorbertNagel 17:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) Slightly overexposed but composition and colours make up for it. Mattbuck 07:46, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shchyokino Pond IMG 3525 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 18:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tula region Near Shchyokino IMG 5148 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taganrog Embankment IMG 7797 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 12:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vvedensky Monastery Bridge over Lake Vvedenskoe IMG 9353 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 12:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your Vote (Picture of the Year)

It seems one of your votes is undefined. Maybe this is related to Can't_vote_on_ogv_files. Could you please try to vote again and remove your undefined vote? --McZusatz (talk) 14:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I apologize for this serious application error. The file you voted for was one of the two videos (1, 2). Simply revisit the gallery, click on the statistics-button next to the video and add your vote manually if it does not work properly this time. You can use # [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]] for manual voting. Thanks in advance. -- RE rillke questions? 15:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

OK! I have already voted for this video Alexxx1979 (talk) 16:08, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gelendzhik Embankment IMG 8610 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 17:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gelendzhik Black Sea IMG 8721 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oryol Oblast near Spasskoye-Lutovinovo IMG 4696 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 21:23, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Petersburg Kunstkamera IMG 5779 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Petersburg Peter and Paul Fortress IMG 5869 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petergof Baltic Sea IMG 6755 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --King of Hearts 20:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladimir IMG 9980 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gelendzhik Berth with pleasure craft IMG 8177 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arzamas Resurrection Cathedral IMG 9666 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 13:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Murom Transfiguration monastery Transfiguration Cathedral IMG 9783 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 13:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yaroslavl Church of Elijah the Prophet IMG 0764 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Gostiny Dvor in Kostroma IMG 0704 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogolyubovo Church of the Intercession on the Nerl IMG 0330 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogolyubovo Church of the Intercession on the Nerl IMG 0336 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diveyevo Serafimo-Diveevsky Monastery IMG 9587 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 05:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diveyevo Serafimo-Diveevsky Monastery The Trinity Cathedral IMG 9603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladimir the views of the river Klyazma IMG 9848 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladimir Road bridge over Klyazma IMG 9864 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diveyevo Serafimo-Diveevsky Monastery The Transfiguration Cathedral IMG 9601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suzdal Museum of Wooden Architecture House IMG 0429 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suzdal Kamenka River IMG 0637 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uglich Volga River IMG 1280 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 10:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suzdal Kamenka River IMG 0468 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is tilted Poco a poco 02:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC) I uploaded a new version (tilt corrected), good photo and QI imo. --ArildV 17:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC) QI Poco a poco 13:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostroma Kostroma River IMG 0679 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostroma Kostroma River Road bridge IMG 0684 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostov Rostov Kremlin Church of the Resurrection of Christ IMG 0851 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostov Lake Nero Spaso-Yakovlevsky Monastery IMG 0996 tonemapped 2 r cc 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostov Lake Nero Ship Zarya IMG 1037 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It needs minor crop from left, but nevertheless QI for me. --Iifar 18:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suzdal Kamenka River IMG 0639 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality to me, despite a dust spot in the sky (or a flying bird) --Myrabella 11:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borisoglebsky IMG 1157 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blown highlights at top, would like those cropped out, but otherwise ok. --Mattbuck 11:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostov Lake Nero Spaso-Yakovlevsky Monastery IMG 0981 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 01:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:36, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borisoglebsky Borisoglebsky Monastery The gate church of Saint Sergius IMG 1185 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novocherkassk Alexander Nevsky Church IMG 9747 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight tilt Poco a poco 15:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Actually the lines on the church look OK to me; there seems to be an inclination on the ground, but that's not up to the photographer. --A.Savin 20:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Ok Poco a poco 21:45, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novocherkassk. Museum of the History of the Don Cossacks IMG 9815 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taganrog Port IMG 9942 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your great images! I hope you keep on contributing! Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Chersonesus Saint Vladimir Cathedral IMG 0723 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Chersonesus Bell IMG 0665 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:16, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taganrog Beriev Aircraft Company Beriev A-50 IMG 1883 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Electric multiple unit ER9P-K-252 ER9P-254 ER9P-81 IMG 5779 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Alexxx1979,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kerch Monument to defenders of Adzhimushkay Quarry IMG 2128 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kiev Memorial in Commemoration of Famines Victims in Ukraine IMG 6253 1725.jpg

And also:

• File:Kiev Memorial in Commemoration of Famines Victims in Ukraine IMG 6292 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 13:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kiev Statue of the founders of Kiev IMG 6231 1725.jpg

And also:

• File:Kiev Statue of the founders of Kiev IMG 6232 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feodosiya port Bulk carrier Era IMG 3090 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:22, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Massandra palace IMG 3432 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. Только почему у вас разрешение камеры установлено не на максимальном значении (18 мпкс)? --A.Savin 11:19, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Pavlovsky cape IMG 3968 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol IMG 4024 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Institute of biology of the Southern Seas IMG 4276 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Palace of Children and Youth Creativity IMG 4274 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Type 1438 passenger ship IMG 4248 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Seagoing tugboat MB-23 IMG 3963 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sevastopol Theater Lunacharsky IMG 4277 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostov-on-Don Zoo Persian onager IMG 5268 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, left crop improvable, though --Poco a poco 09:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dykanka Church of Saint Nicholas IMG 5620 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostov-on-Don Zoo Griffon Vulture IMG 5227 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiev The statue of Bohdan Khmelnytsky IMG 6335 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiev The main building of the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs IMG 6347 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Kiev IMG 6336 1725.jpg

File:Kiev IMG 6336 1725.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gelendzhik lighthouse IMG 7051 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiev Kiev Pechersk Lavra Refectory Church IMG 6410 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Reluctantly because of the overexposed areas and the cut woman ;-) --Moroder 11:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sviatohirsk Sviatohirsk Lavra IMG 5774 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 14:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Cruise ship Costa Fascinosa IMG 7437 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 16:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Cruise ship Ruby Princess IMG 7538 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kiev Maidan Nezalezhnosti IMG 6377 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:36, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kiev Mother Motherland IMG 6246 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 09:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighnaghi IMG 9071 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:07, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Tbilisi The Bridge of Peace IMG 8829 1920.jpg

File:Tbilisi The Bridge of Peace IMG 8829 1920.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Halavar (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gelendzhik IMG 6723 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support For me quite good. Beautiful sky and clouds. --Hockei 20:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ER 797-15 steam locomotive at the station Taganrog-II IMG 7107 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! -- Spurzem 23:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Hagia Sophia IMG 7346 1725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Hagia Sophia IMG 7406 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 21:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Galata Tower IMG 7475 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Dolmabahce Mosque IMG 7575 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки», 7 березня — 5 квітня 2015

Вітаємо!

З 7 березня по 5 квітня 2015 року буде проходити конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки» в україномовному розділі Вікіпедії. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus IMG 7668 1815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with less water at the bottom. And please look for a better categorization. --XRay 17:12, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus IMG 7644 1800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus IMG 7816 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please see my note. --Cccefalon 07:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgia Georgian Military Road Ananuri castle IMG 8802 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus IMG 7897 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Dolmabahçe Mosque IMG 7904 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Cruise ship Ruby Princess IMG 7920 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tbilisi The Metekhi Church of Assumption IMG 8842 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:32, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tbilisi IMG 8850 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tbilisi The Metekhi Church of Assumption IMG 8876 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO. Nice composition--Lmbuga 21:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Large landing ship Aleksandr Shabalin IMG 8143 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The main subject is a bit in the shadow but QI for me -- Spurzem 21:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Maidens Tower IMG 8123 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 18:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Bosphorus Large landing ship Aleksandr Shabalin IMG 8155 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very nice light and good details. --Slaunger 19:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Galata Tower IMG 8211 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tbilisi Holy Trinity Cathedral (Sameba) IMG 8951 1920.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tbilisi Holy Trinity Cathedral (Sameba) IMG 8951 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Slightly tilted CCW (otherwise very good). --C messier 18:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality -- Spurzem 12:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sighnaghi IMG 9086 1920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Hagia Sophia IMG 8615 2050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Nesvizh Castle 7259 2050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Nesvizh Town Hall 7870 2060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 19:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgia Jvari monastery IMG 9320 2055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 10:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Mir Mir Castle Complex 8101 2085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Mir Mir Castle Complex 8094 2075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:42, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Mir Mir Castle Complex Chapel of Sviatopolk-Mirski family 8129 2100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 07:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Mir Mir Castle Complex Chapel of Sviatopolk-Mirski family 8127 2100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top is slightly unsharp but QI overall IMO. --King of Hearts 05:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Mir Saint Nicolas Church 8648 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK and QI, but I would choose a tighter crop, less at the bottom and the right. --XRay 05:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Vladimir Monument to Alexander Nevsky IMG 9821 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Grodno Regional Drama Theater IMG 1245 2150.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grodno Regional Drama Theater IMG 1245 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Grodno Regional Drama Theater IMG 1245 2150.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 08:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Deleted content

---

Hello Alexxx1979/Archive 1, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Tbilisi TV tower IMG 8814 1920.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

• File:Tbilisi TV tower IMG 8819 1920.jpg
• File:Tbilisi TV tower IMG 9007 1920.jpg

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grodno Saint Francis Xavier Cathedral IMG 1339 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augustow Canal IMG 1384 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Brest Brest Fortress Monument Courage 9219 2150.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brest Brest Fortress Monument Courage 9219 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muraŭjoŭ House in Hrodna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belarus Navahrudak IMG 1730 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 16:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brest Brest Fortress Kholm Gate 9209 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grodno Palace of Culture IMG 1351 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 16:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grodno IMG 1371 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grodno Old Castle 11166 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grodno Fire lookout tower 11177 2150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tbilisi The Bridge of Peace IMG 8839 1920.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Brest Brest Fortress Monument Courage 9219 2150.jpg

File:Brest Brest Fortress Monument Courage 9219 2150.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 21:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkhangelskoye Vadim Zadorozhnys Vehicle Museum T-37A IMG 9688 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augustow Canal lock IMG 1382 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. great composition IMO --Hubertl 08:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkhangelskoye Vadim Zadorozhnys Vehicle Museum SU-76 IMG 9692 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:22, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkhangelskoye Vadim Zadorozhnys Vehicle Museum M3A1 Stuart IMG 9763 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkhangelskoye estate IMG 9768 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkhangelskoye estate IMG 9764 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkhangelskoye estate IMG 9790 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkhangelskoye estate IMG 9817 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sochi UralZIS-5 (ZIS-5) P5010108 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krasnaya Polyana Rosa Khutor P5020173 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LV-0233 steam locomotive at the station Taganrog-II IMG 9858 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Victory Day Parade (May 9 2015) Pantsir-S1 P5090721 2185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC) Yes Johann, you are right and main object is sharp. However crop at left side is very small, person right from the truck is cut and the trees are a bit oversharpened --Michielverbeek 05:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC) Thanks for your supplemental comments, Michiel. Yes, you are right. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Victory Day Parade (May 9 2015) P5090724 2195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krasnaya Polyana Rosa Khutor P5020287 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krasnaya Polyana P5020282 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Kremlin Trinity Cathedral with the churches of the Presentation of the Lord and the Introduction in Virgin Mary Church P5090760 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krasnaya Polyana Mzymta River P5020290 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LV-0233 steam locomotive at the station Taganrog-II IMG 9835 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not bad, but your camera can shoot images with a higher resolution than this; do you have a bigger version? --Peulle 10:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Not done, but I guess it's still OK. --Peulle 12:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Kremlin Cathedral of the Assumption and the cathedral bell tower with Prechistinsky Gate P5090769 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krasnaya Polyana Mzymta River P5020308 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Kremlin Cathedral of the Assumption and the cathedral bell tower with Prechistinsky Gate P5090793 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Kremlin Cathedral of the Assumption and the cathedral bell tower with Prechistinsky Gate P5090795 2475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:17, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Cathedral of Saint Vladimir P5090841 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Kremlin P5090805 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oversaturated IMO.--SKas 07:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --SKas 07:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Astrakhan Cathedral of Saint Vladimir P5090852 2200.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Cathedral of Saint Vladimir P5090852 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It would be better, if you brighten the whole image up. --Hubertl 06:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Kremlin Red Gate Tower P5090903 2475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Kremlin The cathedral bell tower with Prechistinsky Gate P5090856 2475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective and sky is good enbough for Q1. IMO the left crop is not well done (people on the road) and I am also not really impressed by the car in right bottom corner. Totally, a week support --Michielverbeek 05:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan P5090854 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Stock Exchange Building P5090963 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 05:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan P5090973 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amursk Amursk combined heat and power plant P7270022 2450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amursk Amursk combined heat and power plant P7290079 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:46, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan P5090983 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amursk Amursk combined heat and power plant P7280067 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Did you use any filter for the halos round the lamps? --Ermell 12:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment No, I have not used filters --Alexxx1979 09:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amursk Amur River P7290102 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:07, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan P5091018 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Possible Featured Picture?

Hi Alex. I think this picture is quite striking. If you nominate it at Featured Picture Candidates, I'd vote for it. Whether others might find some faults with it, I don't know, but I thought I'd compliment you. The combination of the mausoleum and the seemingly endless emptiness all around (except for the post, which some people might ask you to clone out) is really striking to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan P5091019 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Oblast Bokei Khan Mausoleum P5101055 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Oblast Bokei Khan Mausoleum P5101050 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Needs some more Categories. --Ermell 06:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Stock Exchange Building P5101174 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Volga River P5101175 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amursk Amur River P8010333 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amursk Amur River P8010340 2475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 14:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amursk Amur River P8010336 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 14:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrakhan Volga River P5101204 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladivostok Communication boat Uragan P8050478 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elista P5111315 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Категории

Поступайте как знаете, но впредь я буду ваши номинации отклонять, если вы не желаете категоризовать файлы нормально, а не на уровне детского сада. --A.Savin 03:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladivostok Submarine S-56 P8050502 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladivostok Cruiser Varyag P8050482 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe oversharpened, but acceptable for me. --C messier 14:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vladivostok Zolotoy Rog Bay P8050527 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kiev Maidan Nezalezhnosti IMG 6359 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely, Base (talk) 01:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kerch Statue of Lenin IMG 2422 1725.jpg

lNeverCry 04:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan. «The Motherland Calls» P8050030 2200.jpg

And also:

• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan. «The Motherland Calls» P8050080 2475.jpg Off-shell (talk) 08:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan P8050022 2200.jpg

Yours sincerely, Off-shell (talk) 07:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Благодарность за Волгоград

Большое спасибо за многочисленные фотографии Волгограда и области!— Redboston 11:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan P8050006 2205.jpg

And also:

• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan. «The Motherland Calls» P8060420 2200.jpg
• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan. «The Motherland Calls» P8060426 2200.jpg
• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan. «The Motherland Calls» P8060438 2200.jpg

Yours sincerely, Kulmalukko (talk) 14:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Taganrog Monument to Faina Ranevskaya IMG 7775 1725.jpg

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Volgograd. Mamayev Kurgan. «The Motherland Calls» P8060290 2200.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 22:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Alexxx1979,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Astrakhan Cathedral of Saint Vladimir P5090852 2200.jpg

File:Astrakhan Cathedral of Saint Vladimir P5090852 2200.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 14:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Astrakhan Cathedral of Saint Vladimir P5090839 2200.jpg

File:Astrakhan Cathedral of Saint Vladimir P5090839 2200.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tbilisi IMG 8963 1920.jpg

And also:

• File:Tbilisi IMG 8978 1920.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 08:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Astrakhan City power plant P5090939 2200.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Astrakhan City power plant P5090939 2200.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Dogad75 (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Astrakhan Monument Kurmangazy Sagyrbaev P5090990 2475.jpg

File:Astrakhan Monument Kurmangazy Sagyrbaev P5090990 2475.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dogad75 (talk) 22:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Alexxx1979/Archive 1,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Alexxx1979/Archive 1,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Alexxx1979/Archive 1,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Poltava Museum Estate of Vladimir Korolenko bust IMG 5306 1725.jpg

File:Poltava Museum Estate of Vladimir Korolenko bust IMG 5306 1725.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 08:43, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Armenia. Cableway Wings of Tatev P8240772 2350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 15:22, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadonsk. Monastery. Ascension Cathedral P1040915 2655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zadonsk. Monastery of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary. Cathedral of Our Lady of Vladimir P1040890 2700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yelets. Church of the Ascension P1040974 2475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The lantern on the left would be cloned out. QI if corrected. --Tournasol7 04:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)  Done cut lantern on the left --Alexxx1979 05:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks! --Tournasol7 05:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Petersburg. Neva River DSC01937 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neva River. Kuzminsky railway bridge DSC01954 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 11:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grozny. Grozny-City Towers. Mosque The Heart of Chechnya PB040055 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor halos at the buildings, but OK. --XRay 04:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argun. Aymani Kadirova Mosque PB040155 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neva River. Kuzminsky railway bridge DSC01959 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. --Watchduck 17:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Ladoga. Valaam. The skete of saint Nicolas the Wonder-Worker P7170382 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neva River DSC01956 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality added some categories. --MB-one 10:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Ladoga. Valaam. The skete of saint Nicolas the Wonder-Worker P7170384 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kizhi. Oshevnev House DSC02659 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Ladoga. Valaam. Meteor hydrofoil P7170406 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kizhi. Chapel of the Archangel Michael DSC02753 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments looks slightly tilted CW --MB-one 09:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)  Done - aligned to horizon --Alexxx1979 11:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valaam. The Resurrection skete. Church of the Resurrection of Christ P7160099 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:53, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prokhorovka. Saint Nicholas Church P5070158 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prokhorovka. Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paul P5070031 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 09:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Onega P7190639 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me (the shadows are very dark, but this is a matter of taste). --Aristeas 13:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prokhorovka. Zvonnitsa in Prokhorovka Battlefield P5070216 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Petersburg. Moyka River P7221317 2375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taganrog, Taganrog Metallurgical Plant P7200697 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prokhorovka. Zvonnitsa in Prokhorovka Battlefield P5070219 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small dust spot, see note --Poco a poco 13:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)  Done Removed spots in the sky --Alexxx1979 16:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Hwwo 17:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volgograd, embankment P8080523 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volgograd. Memorial museum-panorama "The Battle of Stalingrad" P8060235 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 11:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taganrog. Port P7200876 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but can you add a more specific category related to the crains --Poco a poco 15:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)  Done created and transferred to the category "Port cranes in Taganrog" --Alexxx1979 16:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saratov. Holy Trinity Cathedral P8090860 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svir River P7210779 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 07:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volga river. Svyato-Bogorodicky monastery P8101233 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volga river. Svyato-Bogorodicky monastery P8101215 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volga river. Klyuchishchi. Church of the Nativity of John the Baptist P8111761 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 04:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volga. Kazan P8111799 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan. Annunciation Cathedral P8111938 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin. Spasskaya Tower P8111872 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheboksary. Dormition Church P8121970 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yoshkar-Ola. Cathedral of the Resurrection of Christ P8122223 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheboksary. Dormition Church P8121972 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image. It's leaning in. --XRay 04:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)  Done fixed perspective --Alexxx1979 11:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 08:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yoshkar-Ola. Church of the Holy Trinity P8122227 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A lot of shade here but good quality. --Podzemnik 04:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Harsh 2580 09:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yoshkar-Ola. Cathedral of the Resurrection of Christ P8122167 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ZI Jony 13:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizhny Novgorod. Church of Our Lady of Kazan P8132492 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image --PantheraLeo1359531 08:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starocherkasskaya. Donskoy Convent. Cathedral Church P5130313 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI although I'd have waited to let the guy with the red umbrella pass by --Poco a poco 09:03, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zheltovodsky Makaryev Monastery of the Holy Trinity P8142761 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sviyazhsk P8150111 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starocherkasskaya. Saints Peter and Paul Church P5130372 2200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sviyazhsk P8150126 2475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image but more categorization needed. --MB-one 12:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Stepro 17:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Kiev Memorial in Commemoration of Famines Victims in Ukraine IMG 6254 1725.jpg

File:Kiev Memorial in Commemoration of Famines Victims in Ukraine IMG 6254 1725.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)