Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Daryona!

File:Renee O'Connor Bride.jpg edit

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses
File:Renee O'Connor Bride.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid. Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.

Deutsch  English  magyar  português do Brasil  italiano  norsk  norsk bokmål  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  suomi  українська  svenska  sicilianu  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Regretably "Nightwish fan" from flickr is not the copyright holder of this photo. Only the copyright holder (photographer in most cases) can provide a free licensing, noone else. --Martin H. (talk) 21:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

663e519399bd63147cec97e9f613a222

TUSC token 663e519399bd63147cec97e9f613a222 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Mali location map edit

I was delighted to see that there is an new clear map for Mali but disappointed to find that the map is rather inaccurate (judged by Google). I noticed that towns such as Bamako and Djenne were too far North of the Niger river. Bamako should be on the river, Timbuktu should sit around 15km N of the river but appears further than this, while Djenne should be around 37km S of the river but appears to be on the river. Mopti should be on the river (S. bank). I've used Location map+ on my sandbox page here and entered coordinates of some towns and border points. Location maps need to use a equirectangular projection. Is this the case here? Are the map limits accurate?Aa77zz (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • This map is based on another maps from Commons (see the list of maps in the description of new map). It seems that they were not equirectangular, as I thought before. Please, don't use it now as a location map. The primary purpose of creating this map was illustration of regions of Mali and I didn't pay enough attention to accuracy of coordinates. It was one of my first maps created, so it's actually not safe to use and of my maps now. :) I will review all my maps in nearest future and will update description with the claims if maps are not precise, sources and other useful info. Sorry for any inconvinience that may be caused by this confuse. --Daryona (talk) 12:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The map is already being used on English Wikipedia. I've made small changes to the bottom and left coords to obtain a better fit - but if you look at my Sandbox the errors are still quite significant at the top of the map. Fortunately this area is less critical as it is mainly uninhabited desert. Aa77zz (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 2a5577711fccb88baa4b4c493560226f edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Requests edit

Can you make svg maps for pin of Democratic Republic of Congo, Algeria, Morocco, Mauritania, Nigeria, Liberia, Chad, Central African Republic and Cote d Ivoire?Perry Rimmer (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Aldar.jpg edit

А вы знаете автора фотографии? Фото взято из открытых источников, где не указывалось авторство. Поэтому что бы соблюсти букву закона я указал источник откуда взял. И ни коим образом не присваивал.

Если у вас есть другие фото будьте добры выложить их здесь. Будем только благодарны.

  • Я не знаю автора фотографии. На викисклад нельзя загружать фотографии, взятые "из открытых источников", "в интернете" и т.д. Все фотографии здесь публикуются под одной из свободных лицензий, поэтому для загрузки фотографии нужно обладать правами на ее публикацию. т.е. либо автор сам должен загрузить фотографию, либо нужно его разрешение. При загрузке Вы указали лицензию: "Я, владелец авторских прав на это произведение, настоящим передаю его в общественное достояние", что недопустимо - Вы не владеете авторскими правами и не можете распоряжаться изображением. --Daryona (talk) 23:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Anna_Semenovich_and_Lilia_Sharlovskaya_2009.jpg edit

 
File:Anna_Semenovich_and_Lilia_Sharlovskaya_2009.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bratskoe, Vologodskaya oblast.JPG edit

Даша, Вы координаты не проверите? У меня что-то вроде совсем не там получается. И если река - Сухона, надо её в категорию.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 22:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Категоризация судов edit

При изменение названия судна фотографии в новую категорию не переносятся. Другими словами: название категории должно соответствовать названию судна на момент фотографирования. Подробнее: проект правила.--Mike1979 Russia (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Sergey Sobyanin small photo.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sergey Sobyanin small photo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Leyo 12:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Cheryl Bernard playing curling.jpg edit

 
File:Cheryl Bernard playing curling.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Категоризация edit

Даша, когда вы создаёте категории культурного наследия по районам, если Вам не сложно, отправляйте их сразу и в Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Russia by district (с тем же ключом). Огромное спасибо за категоризацию.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krylatsky Hills 2010-06-06 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bit low contrasty imo - needs more low levels. Mattbuck 02:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)   Done I've tried to fix it a bit, check the new version. - A.Savin 11:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
OK. Mattbuck 11:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Reply

File:II MelnragėBotanTab.jpg edit

Здравствуйте! Можете-ли Вы мне объяснить, почему точно Вы удалили фото File:II MelnragėBotanTab.jpg? Оно же было снято в публичном протранстве и его объект - схема - даже предназначена к информации всему обществу. На неё не были никакие ссылки к авторским правам...? Thank You in advance for Your answer. --Kusurija (talk) 09:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Его удалил Ronhjones, проще всего к нему и обратиться.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Daryona,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Igor Kolakovic.jpg edit

 
File:Igor Kolakovic.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

lNeverCry 02:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Ali Karimi in Dinamo Zagreb.jpg edit

 
File:Ali Karimi in Dinamo Zagreb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daphne Lantier 04:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Ali Karimi crop.jpg edit

 
File:Ali Karimi crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daphne Lantier 04:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Sajjad Esteki.jpg edit

 
File:Sajjad Esteki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daphne Lantier 04:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Grebnoy_Kanal edit

 

Grebnoy Kanal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Voltmetro 18:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Mother Volga monument in Rybinsk.jpg edit

 
File:Mother Volga monument in Rybinsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:9CAB:EBDA:1B19:7568 23:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply