DragonFire1024

Image:Zawahiri.jpg

Please note that this image has previously been deleted per request on Commons:Deletion requests. The photo was obviously not taken by a U.S. government employee, so the copyright status remains unknown. /Slarre 15:26, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

That does not matter. as far as I know policy states as long as the source is from the US GOV then the picture is allowed. DragonFire1024 19:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

No. That the image is simply used by the US government does not automatically make it PD; as defined by US Copyright Law, "a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties". See Work of the United States Government. /Slarre 13:03, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Abu Ghraib pics

I'm interested in why you've tagged the SBS Abu Ghraib pics as copyvios. As {{AbuGhraibPic}} says, the pictures are PD, as long as they're authentic. So you're tagging the pictures because you allege them to be forgeries? "A Pentagon official, speaking on condition of anonymity, has confirmed the images aired on Wednesday are authentic, the AFP news agency reports."[1] I think we can, for the purposes of the Commons, safely assume that the pics are authentic, in which case they're not copyvios. —Gabbe 16:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi DragonFire. Generally in the case of lack of source information, the image should be tagged {{subst:snd}} (no source) and the uploader should be notified, rather than {{Copyvio}}. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 18:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Photos of Abu Ghraib Abuse

I am in the process of removing all of your copyvio tags from the photos of the abuse in Abu Ghraib Prison, Iraq. These images are in the public domain because they are ineligible for copyright. This applies worldwide. Pictures taken by U.S. military personnel on duty are ineligible for copyright, unless the photographer successfully claims that the photographs were not taken as part of his or her official duties. The photographers of the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse photos have not made this claim, and have in fact denied it under oath. --Descendall 07:08, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

These pictures are NOT sourced properly and until they are they are not from abugraib as we cannot prove that. Fine, violate your own policies. DragonFire1024 13:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Most American media outlets have confirmed that these photos were on the CD leaked to them about a year ago. The Washington Post wrote an article about how they have had these photos since the Abu Ghraib story first broke. The United States Central Command, which oversees operations in Iraq, confirmed that they were from Abu Ghraib and said that it was irresponsible to publish them now, as these pictures were taken at the same time that the last batch of Abu Ghraib pictures were taken. Salon.com not only has the pictures, but they also apparantly have leaked memos from the Abu Ghraib investigation describing each photo. Several photos show American Military Police officers and prisoners that we already know where in Abu Ghraib. For example, Satar Jabar, by far the most famous Abu Ghraib inmate, appears in several of the photos. Ivan Frederick, who is currently in a military prison for his role in the abuse, appears in the photos, as does the inmate on whom he famously sat. Charles Graner, who is serving ten years in prison for abusing the inmates, appears on several of the new photos. I don't know what more proof you want. --Descendall 17:45, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Dragonfire, this is being discussed on COM:DEL. If you want to talk about these images please do so there. Please let that process run its course. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:32, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

It does not matter to me what paper they were in or what not. If the images are not properly sourced, as to where they came from, then they do not belong on the commons according to opolicy. We need to source them PROPERLY. We cannot just upload pictures because we "think" they are from a US source...WE NEED PROOF! We need the Source links. But like I said, if you want to go against your own policies, then so be it. DragonFire1024 21:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:153394main_pia08630-browse.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 19:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Midhat Mursi al-Sayid Umar.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Midhat Mursi al-Sayid Umar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thuresson 10:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:AuburnElmwood.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AuburnElmwood.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 10:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 22:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image: 10132006 60.jpg

Oh, sorry. Now I've restored the image. Best regards Lugusto • ※ 19:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:20070219 1118236758001.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:20070219 1118236758001.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 16:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Frankfurtnight.JPG

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Frankfurtnight.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Thuresson 16:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:(253) mathilde crop.jpg

Hi. I removed the copyvio tag from this image because the source image is in the public domain and this image is more tightly cropped from the original making it useful. I don't think it qualifies for speedy deletion. If you want to attempt deletion via Deletion Requests, you are welcome to try. Sorry. MECU≈talk 14:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Being a cropped of a high resolution image is fine. The original is high resolution, and the crop just removed a lot of the black around it. MECU≈talk 13:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Use of {{Badname}}

{{Badname}} should only be used when both images are identical and the image you placed the template on was uploaded by you. If the image is identical but not uploaded by you use {{Duplicate}} instead. Also please bare in mind that if an image is in a different file format (for example svg and png) they can never be identical. Thank you. Lcarsdata 14:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:175935main sn2006gy main 516.jpg

Regarding the deletion of this image, note that on the bottom of the NASA webpage (here) there is a link to the original authors (here) at the Chandra X-Ray Observatory. The image is also credited to them (NASA/CXC), which means it is their work. Their image use policy (here) clearly states "The images on this web site may be used for non-commercial educational and public information purposes", which means this image can't be used on the Commons. Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 21:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Please re-read the image notice page here, which states "credit images to "NASA/CXC/SAO" unless other credits are given". This is directly after their noncom/edu-only usage restriction statement. Almost all of the credits say NASA, yet it does not change the fact that their images have usage restrictions. --Tom (talk - email) 21:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

While it may be operated for NASA, it is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO). Understand that this is a Smithsonian-owned program, not a NASA-owned program, though it does received NASA funding. It is free to restrict usage on its work as it pleases, as just about every Smithsonian program does. I'm sure that was a stipulation in the funding agreement. Also, note the image restriction usage page on the SAO website, which is even firmer in the restriction notices: http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/policies/image_use.html. I'm not sure how they could be any clearer regarding the use of their images. Legally speaking, we have to respect these restrictions. --Tom (talk - email) 22:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I've been in contact with the observatory to help clear up their copyright policy. It ends up that images credited ONLY to the NASA/CXC (and also NASA/CXC/[name of specific author], i.e. NASA/CXC/M. Weiss), are public domain images that have the same usage restrictions as any standard NASA image. Their "noncommercial and educational use only" policy is in place because they use a great many images from third parties. For example, the photo montage that you uploaded only has one PD image and at least one copyrighted image from the Lick telescope. The other image credited to UC Berkeley may or may not be copyrighted; I'm clearing that up. Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 13:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hotel2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Hotel2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Adambro 13:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

• Also, Image:Hotel3.jpg. Adambro 13:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Minneapolis_I-35W_map1.JPG

Thanks for the quick work on finding this image and cropping it to make it available for a breaking story. A couple of nits... first I think the link to the source you give is not right, it goes to the license that applies to MN state gov works, rather than to the page where the image came from. Can you fix that? I did a quick search on the MN-DOT site and did not find the map myself. Second, I think the license tag you gave is for US Fed work since it talks about the Fed DOT. I do not know if there is a MN gov license tag to use, trying to research that, and I'll fix it if I find it, or discuss whether we should create one. Thanks again for your efforts! ++Lar: t/c 13:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

PS it's clear to me the image itself is PD if it came from the MN DOT site per the disclaimer you cite and link, it's just that it's not quite tagged right and not attributed right. So it's not like it needs deleting, just fixing. Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 14:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Earthquakes_in_Peru_August_16-2007_6-37_UTC.gif

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 07:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Dan_Keating.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Dan_Keating.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Thuresson 19:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mars2.jpg

---

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 78.48.8.63 10:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:FBI-pedophile-symbols-416.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FBI-pedophile-symbols-416.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih 22:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree that this appears to be a copyright violation. While the FBI may have "borrowed" the image for a report, they don't have the power to release into the public domain a copyrighted photo created by others. This image obviously belongs to this site. (It's absurd to think that a pro-pedophile jewelry store would use an FBI photo of their product as an advertisement). Please remove the PD claim unless you have evidence that the site claiming copyright didn't create the image. Will Beback 08:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I doubt the US government will commit copyvio buy publishing copyrighted material. But whatever. DragonFire1024 11:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't think that the FBI A) cares if they violate the copyright of a jewelry store, or B) intended to publish the image. It appears to be an internal memo that was leaked or unofficially publicized. I interpret your "whatever" as acquiescence in removing the PD tag. There is a GFDL drawing of the same logo. This images isn't necessary to illustrate articles so deleting it won't leave a large vacuum.Cheers Will Beback 09:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Flickr images

Please remember to tag images you upload from Flickr with {{Flickrreview}} ;-) Please read Commons:Flickr images for more information. --Boricuæddie 14:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

categories

Hello! Thanks for uploading so many pics from the Buffalo protest. One thing, though. Would you mind adding new pictures to the more specific category Buffalo, New York 2008 "Anonymous" anti-Scientology protests in stead of the more general Category:2008 "Anonymous" anti-Scientology protests? This will help keep all the pictures organized and managable once many more start being uploaded. Thanks, and let me know if you think a different organizational scheme might work better. Best, Dar-Ape 20:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

They are in both cats if that matters :-) DragonFire1024 21:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Phoenix_Lander_Mars_possible_Ice.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Phoenix_Lander_Mars_possible_Ice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

WolfmanSF (talk) 03:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Category:2008-02 Melbourne, Australia "Anonymous" anti-Scientology protests

Image deletion warning

Category:2008-02 Melbourne, Australia "Anonymous" anti-Scientology protests has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ottre (talk) 18:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Melbourne_Australia_Scientology_Protest_Feb_10-2008.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Melbourne_Australia_Scientology_Protest_Feb_10-2008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-Nard the Bard 23:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, DragonFire1024!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 11:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Essex outline highlighting Manningtree map.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

File:Lansana_Conte_VOA.jpg

File:Lansana_Conte_VOA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

File:FBI-pedophile-symbols-416.jpg

File:FBI-pedophile-symbols-416.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

malo (talk) 12:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Starbirth.jpg

File:Starbirth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 10:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Fire in the Vicinity of an Oil Pipeline in Homs, Syria.jpg

File:Fire in the Vicinity of an Oil Pipeline in Homs, Syria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Samuell (talk) 03:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

File:LoveLetter virus e-mail screenshot.gif

File:LoveLetter virus e-mail screenshot.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheChampionMan1234 (talk) 23:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,.jpg

File:Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:COTA Logo.jpg

File:COTA Logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

1989 17:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

File:FaceMars.jpg

File:FaceMars.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McGeddon (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

File:FaceMars4.jpg

File:FaceMars4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McGeddon (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)