F3rn4nd0

The Colombian coat of arms

Would you mind explaining this to me?

since the image comes from the presidential website it is in the public domain.

In particular, I'd like to know where in the presidential website does it say that all images on it are in the public domain. Please don't answer here, but in the image talk page. --Fibonacci 14:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Atlanticomunmap1.png

Hey,

When uploading this image you stated under permission: "for wikipedia and sister projects only." I just wanted to let you know that if you release the images under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License and the GFDL, you cannot restrict usage to just wikimedia foundation projects. Images that only have permission to be used on wikipedia (or wikimedia foundation projects) are not allowed on commons. I was wondering if you could clarify what you meant and if you only meant to give permission for WMF projects, I am willing to delete the image as a misunderstanding of the licenses. Thanks, Yonatanh 06:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I was offering to delete them in case you wanted me to because you hadn't meant to release them under the free licenses. ;) Yes, the only problem there was with the word only, I will go ahead and remove it. Thanks, Yonatanh 06:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

By the way, you do understand that if somebody wants to use these images on his websites he is allowed to as long as he mentions your name, right? Yonatanh 06:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Siebrand 14:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

svgs of colombia

hola! te escribo porque vi que has añadido una cantidad de imagenes utiles para colombia, y pues esto tiene mucho q ver. añadí estos archivos:

son archivos SVG(no se si estas familiarizado, igual te explico lo poco que se), y son mucho más útiles, para fines de la edición comunitaria y para la calidad(no importa q tanto los agrandes no pierden calidad), que los archivos de mapas de bits como los png.

Que te parece si coordinamos el cambio de los mapas de los proyectos de municipios y departamentos de colombia para usar estos? lo mejor sería que simplemente con bajar un programa, Inkscape, se puede editar y por ejemplo crear esta versión a partir del de atlántico:

Yo es la primera vez que oigo de svg o de inkscape, no se manejar photoshop ni nada por el estilo.. e igual salieron bien. asi que pienso que posibilitaria muchas cosas buenas pa los proyectos. ah,se me olvidaba, para crear el de colombi use tu verison grande en png, gracias! Canislupusarctos 18:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Me parece bien que lo hagas.. yo tambien tengo inkscape.. pero ya habia comenzado a hacer los mapas en otro formato.. es un trabajo bastante tedioso y ultimamente ando un poco ocupado... --F3rn4nd0 16:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Image deletion

Thank you for the note. --Manop 21:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wikifootball-logo.png

Te he dejado un mensaje en Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Wikifootball-logo.png.

I've left you a message at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Wikifootball-logo.png.

--Boricuaeddie 19:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Farcflagsvg.svg

Image deletion warning

Image:Farcflagsvg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

I fixed your deletion request. Same also goes for Image:Farcflagsvg2.svg - Next time, please follow all the steps on the template so that your request does not end up in "Incomplete deletion requests". Deadstar (msg) 14:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image(s) of the great wall

Hi F3rn4nd0,
Thanks fo uploading your picture(s) of the great wall to commons!
While cleaning up Category:Great Wall of China I found your image without a local information (Badaling, Mutianyu, ???).

Picture(s):

• Image:Dam and great wall china.jpg
• Image:Pollution over the great wall.jpg

Can you please tell me on my discussion page where is it from.
Thank you D-Kuru 13:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank's a lot for the information :-D

--D-Kuru 21:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Thegiraffe3.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Thegiraffe3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Deadstar (msg) 12:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions

---

I noticed you've uploaded one or more images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing! ^{__ ABF __} ϑ 20:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Museo Botero Bogotá by Turista Perene.png

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Museo Botero Bogotá by Turista Perene.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

RedCoat 16:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Museo_Botero_Bogotá_by_Turista_Perene.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Museo_Botero_Bogotá_by_Turista_Perene.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-Nard 17:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

wtf!

Me gustaría aclarar que la imagen Saltto.jpg no proviene de ninguna fuente guvernamental, ya que usted me la ha reportado 2 veces y en realidad cumple con todos los requerimientos, fue tomada por un compañero durante una clase de fotografía en a que asistimos al salto y es de gran importancia para dar una buena imagen de colombia por ser una excelente toma del salto, además es candidata entre las fotos del dia y su reporte ha hecho que me den puntajes negativos, hace mucho que no hay una imagen del dia de colombia y al paso que vamos no la habrá... --Agostinhox 22:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Concentration_camps_FARC_Colombia.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Concentration_camps_FARC_Colombia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lokal_Profil 20:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Museo Botero Bogotá by Turista Perene.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Museo Botero Bogotá by Turista Perene.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 07:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Imagen Ubicacion Geografica Municipios de Cundinamarca

Hola,

Estoy editando la pagina de Utica Cundinamarca y quisiera saber si tiene alguna imagen con la ubicacion geografica del municipio. Me parece muy buena su iniciativa de crear estas imagenes. Si quiere, le puedo ayudar a hacerlas.

ivancon80

Small error.

Hello, ive noticed a small title error in the map: image:Ecuador Colombia Venezuela map.png. You wrote "Portugesa" and it should say "Portuguesa". The other thing is that you missed The "Malpelo Island" in Colombia. Thanks a lot for your time. Bye. --Zeroth 17:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Also you wrote "Granada" next to an island that should be "Grenada". 82.31.166.26 23:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

OK... but Malpelo is not a department and it's too small to appear on the map... --F3rn4nd0 23:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Coat of arms of Urumita.png

Don't want to discourage your well-intentioned efforts, but pasting in little photographs of things is very different from the way heraldic illustration has traditionally been done, and is probably inadvisable in the great majority of cases. However, if you do choose to paste in photographs, then the source images need to be available under free licensing terms in order for the "collage" to be posted on Wikimedia Commons. AnonMoos 05:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Saludos

Hola Fernando, me gustaría usar esta imagen para mi anteproyecto de tesis en el Municipio de Samaná (Caldas, Colombia) http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:MunsCaldas_Samana.png y me gustaría usarla con la licencia cc 2.5, pero preferiría poder usarla con tu nombre "real", en caso de no haber ningún problema con ello te pido que por favor me lo comentes, preferiblemente a mi correo cata18_@hotmail.com, muchas gracias. Starrynight8 (talk) 12:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

com ha estado, bien, es para recordarle la creación de los municipios de San José de Ure y Tuchín en Córdoba, y los municipios que ha tenido problemas en su creación: Guachené en Cauca y Currulao en Antioquia.

Pozos 09:09 mayo 4 del 2008 (CET)

hola, pues todavia no han salido los mapas oficiales con los limites. Toca esperar a que el IGAC los publique. --F3rn4nd0 22:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Hola my brother, oiga digame que problema hay con las imagenes que subi, tanto colombia como el mundo tienen derecho a verlas y no he violado ninguna norma de derechos de autor. Solo digame con todo respeto que hay de malo con las imagenes de jaime pardo leal, bernardo jaramillo, carlos castaño, carlos pizarro y luis carlos galan?.

Please use JPG for photos

Hi, in my humble opinion, you should rather use the jpeg format when uploading photos, rather than the PNG format, which is better adapted to drawings. Frédéric 09:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

en:Colombian National Army

Hi, I saw you the used my graphic Image:Colombian National Army.png to create graphics for the 1st and 2nd divisions of the Colombian National Army. Very good :-) 2 things: I have a much better quality graphic on my computer (which I can't upload to commons, because it is too big) and if you want I can email it to you. Secondly I cut the 1, 2 and 3 divisions out of the graphic and uploaded them and you can find them in the category: Category:Military OrBat Graphics/Colombia. If you want the graphics of the other 4 divisions too I will cut them out and upload them for your use (what names should I call them?? I do not jnow how you say: 4tf, 5th, 6th and 7th in Spanish). Also: if you find out that there are changes to the structure of the Colombian National Army let me know and I will quickly update the graphic. --Noclador (talk) 12:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Noclador, thanks for the graphic! :) I think this one works perfectly.

the other names are

• (4th) Cuarta dividion del ejercito de Colombia Image:Cuarta division ejercito de Colombia.png
• (5th) Quinta dividion del ejercito de Colombia Image:Quinta division ejercito de Colombia.png
• (6th) Sexta dividion del ejercito de Colombia Image:Sexta division ejercito de Colombia.png
• (7th) Septima division del ejercito de Colombia Image:Septima division ejercito de Colombia.png

Cheers.--F3rn4nd0 (talk) 18:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Uploaded the other 4 divisions :-) --Noclador (talk) 22:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Chocó

Hola! Por lo regular no estoy en commons, así que, si quieres, puedes responderme en mi página de discusión de wikipedia. El problema está en Category:Maps of municipalities in the department of Chocó; ya que en todos ellos se muestra a Belén de Bajirá como un municipio (el de Image:MunsChoco belendebajira.png). Lo que te pido, si no te molesta, por supuesto, es que corrijas todos los mapas, en particular Ríosucio y Carmen del Darién, dejando intacta a Image:MunsChoco belendebajira.png ya que la utilizamos a manera histórica. Muchas gracias de antemano, ×α£đ 13:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Concentration camps FARC Colombia.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Concentration camps FARC Colombia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--rootology (T) 17:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Etiquetando imagen Image:Gran_Colombia_map_2.png

Esta imagen puede ser borrada.

Gracias por subir Image:Gran_Colombia_map_2.png. Me he dado cuenta de que la página de la imagen actualmente no especifica quién creó el contenido, así que el estatus del derecho de autor no está claro. Si no has creado tú mismo esta imagen, entonces es necesario que argumentes por qué la imagen se puede usar en Wikimedia Commons (ver el enlace de etiquetas de derecho de autor abajo); también debes especificar dónde la encontraste; por ejemplo, en la mayoría de los casos, un enlace a la web de donde la tomaste y los términos de uso del contenido de esa web.

Si la imagen no tiene una etiqueta de derecho de autor también debes añadírsela. Si tú creaste la imagen, entonces te recomendamos usar {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} para licenciarla con la GFDL y todas las versiones de la Creative Commons CC-BY-SA. Puedes mirar Marcas de derechos de autor para la lista completa de etiquetas que se pueden usar.

Ten en cuenta que cualquier imagen sin fuente o sin etiqueta será borrada una semana después de que haya sido subida, como se describe en criterios para borrado rápido. Si has subido otras imágenes, por favor, comprueba que has especificado también sus orígenes y sus etiquetas de derecho de autor. Puedes encontrar todas los archivos que has subido usando la herramienta Gallery. Gracias. Lugusto • ※ 04:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Division politica colombia.svg

Hola, me ha gustado tu imagen de la división política de Colombia, de tal modo que la he utilizado en wikipedia en español para servir de localizador de cada uno de los artículos referentes a los es:Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia. Como ví que no se usa en ninguna parte, quisiera hacerle unas pequeñas modificaciones (como cambiar el color de algunos departamentos) pero debido a que le pusiste licencia "ShareALike" no me atrevo a subirla sin antes pedirte permiso para la modificación, ya que la verdad no deseo subirla como nueva imagen sino como una corrección de la misma.

Gracias Shadowxfox (talk) 03:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

PD: preferiría que me dejaras tu respuesta en mi página de usuario de wikipedia en español: Shadowxfox

Image:Marianoospinaperez1.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Marianoospinaperez1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Damiens.rf 12:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Orito Putumayo

Orito

Podrías corregir un error que hay en el recuadro de este mapa? El sombreado en verde del recuadro corresponde a Vaupés no el Putumayo. Saludos.--Tequendamia (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fernando_Lugo_1.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fernando_Lugo_1.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fernando_Lugo_1.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fabian_Ramirez_FARC.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fabian_Ramirez_FARC.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fabian_Ramirez_FARC.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 01:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Fabian_Ramirez_FARC.png

File:Fabian_Ramirez_FARC.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 01:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Poporo by Turista Perene.png

Hi F3rn4nd0, you have transfered this image from Flickr. Your support in locating and transfering such treasures as this one from Flickr is greatly appreciated. But it would be helpful to select the variant with the highest resolution (this is not the one you get in the preview at Flickr) and to keep that file untouched, i.e. to avoid a conversion from JPEG to PNG by which the EXIF metadata get lost. Meanwhile, Leoboudv was so kind to transfer the image again, this time selecting the high resolution variant. I have asked the CommonsDelinker to substitute the lowres by the freshly transfered highres variant and I will delete the lowres variant as soon as this is completed. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 08:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Map of Department of Magdalena

Hi F3rn4nd0, you have uploaded the map of Magdalena Department and Santa Marta, stating that it is for "Wikipedia use only". Would it be possible for us at Wikitravel to use it, as long as we follow the CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence, including the attribution of your work? If so, could you please update the licence text to "Attribution and for use on Wikipedia and Wikitravel only"? Also, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page here on Commons, should I miss your reply here. Cheers, Riggwelter (talk) 14:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Maria_Concepcion_Loperena.jpg

File:Maria_Concepcion_Loperena.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Colombia.svg

En pro de seguir mejorando el artículo del Escudo de Colombia en español, quisiera saber si no te molestaría que modificara esta imagen por una que estoy fabricando y que pienso subir a finales de mes. Se que antes no te pedí permiso para modificarla, pero porque eran cambios muy pequeños; en cambio esta vez será casi que una imagen nueva. Shadowxfox (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Popeye at Universal by Luis Perez.jpg

File:Popeye at Universal by Luis Perez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--TheDJ (talk) 23:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Flag of the farc-ep.png

File:Flag of the farc-ep.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Tonyjeff (talk) 01:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_the_farc-ep.png

File:Flag_of_the_farc-ep.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--DieBuche (talk) 08:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Colombian patrol ship nodriza.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Colombian patrol ship nodriza.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Colombian patrol ship nodriza.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of the farc-ep.png

File:Flag of the farc-ep.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 21:01, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Museo Botero Bogotá by Turista Perene.png

Yours sincerely, Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 18:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Guacamayas.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Guacamayas.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Kersti (talk) 09:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Guacamayas.png

File:Guacamayas.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kersti (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Visa-free travel for Colombians.png

File:Visa-free travel for Colombians.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Luisfege (talk) 06:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File:La Bandeja Paisa - Antioquia.jpg

File:La Bandeja Paisa - Antioquia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bohème (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 19:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Colombia.svg

File:Coat of arms of Colombia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Dondiegomontoya.png

File:Dondiegomontoya.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Antioquiaseal.png

File:Antioquiaseal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.47 12:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Tinoasprillaandme.png

File:Tinoasprillaandme.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Dinero de Colombia.png

Yours sincerely, Discasto _talk 07:39, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:HoracioSerpa.png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HoracioSerpa.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

sourced to image since deleted as copyvio BevinKacon (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)