User talk:FlocciNivis/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi FlocciNivis/Archive 1,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 00:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi FlocciNivis/Archive 1,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Landesgewerbeamt Karlsruhe.jpg

Hallo DavidJRasp, das Foto zeigt nicht das Landesgewerbeamt, sondern die Säulen des Kaiserkarrees am Marktplatz. Die Kategorie habe ich bereits geändert. Hast du einen Vorschlag für einen aussagekräftigen Dateinamen, um die Datei umzubenennen? Übrigens habe ich bei einigen deiner Uploads die Kulturdenkmal-Kategorie entfernt, weil bereits die gesamte Gebäude- bzw. Objektkategorie als Denkmal eingeordnet ist. Das wäre sonst Überkategorisierung, siehe COM:OVERCAT. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Sitacuisses,

Wie wäre es dann vielleicht einfach mit "Säulen des Kaiserkarrees Karlsruhe"?

Die redundante Kulturdenkmal Kategorie bei vielen meiner Bilder kam, glaub ich, dadurch zustande, dass der Wizard von Wiki Loves Monuments einen auch (optional) nach der Stadt fragt und die dann als Kategorie ergänzt. Ich werd da in Zukunft drauf achten.

Danke dir für deine Korrekturen! Viele Grüße --DavidJRasp (talk) 06:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Das Bild habe ich nach deinem Vorschlag umbenannt. Ja, die unzureichend erläuterten Uploadformulare sind leider für sehr viel unnötige Mehrarbeit verantwortlich, da muss man ein wenig aufpassen. Deinen Beitrag von meiner Diskussionsseite habe ich hierher kopiert, damit alles beieinander bleibt, siehe Commons:Talk page guidelines. --Sitacuisses (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi FlocciNivis/Archive 1,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Sckell Monument Inschrift 3.jpg

File:Sckell Monument Inschrift 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.182.40.85 22:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2019 - September - Horses/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture White Horse.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Horses, in September 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear FlocciNivis,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Blies-Grenz-Weg Symbol.jpg

File:Blies-Grenz-Weg Symbol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jistrum (talk) 17:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear FlocciNivis,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Margaretenkirche (Salach)

Hallo! Ich hab die Denkmal-Nr. von 096.006 auf 096.005 geändert. Dies hier ist die evangelische Kirche. Es gibt eine katholische Kirche an dem Ort mit dem gleichen Namen St. Margaretha (hab gerade den Artikel auf de.wiki bearbeitet). Siehe die Liste hier auf Seite 115. Grüße,--Nadi2018 (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Danke dir für die Korrektur! --DavidJRasp (talk) 13:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020

Hallo DavidJRasp,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2020 findet zum achten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum siebten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2019
• 
  Hessigheimer Felsengärten
• 
  Silberteich im Harz
• 
  Nationalpark Jasmund

Dieses Jahr ist es aufgrund der Ausgangsbeschränkungen schwieriger aktuelle Fotos zu machen, deshalb läuft der Wettbwerb dieses Mal zwei Monate. Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du hier und vor allem unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du möchtest am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die deiner Meinung nach angeschafft werden sollte, freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 31. Juli 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 08:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Wusterhang und Beierwies

Hallo DavidJRasp,

Du hast vor kurzem eine neue commonscat für das Naturschutzgebiet Wusterhang und Beierwies angelegt, dabei existiert schon längst eine, siehe Naturschutzgebiet Wusterhang und Beierwies bei Fechingen. Das ist neben den Sankt Arnualer Wieses quasi mein Heimspiel, da ich in Brebach wohne. Deswegen habe ich ein redirect gemacht. Nur wie ich die wikidata reinbkomme, dafür bin ich zu blöd. Kannst Du das machen?

Gruss, anro (talk) 08:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

p.s. Wenn Du magst, können wir gerne auchmal zusammen die Gegend um Saarbrücken unsicher machen, z.B. könnte ich Dir Orchideen-Standorte in den St. Arnualer Wiesen zeigen

Hallo AnRo,

Ups, das hat ich übersehen. Danke dir für das Berichtigen! Das Wikidata ändere ich dann auch gleich mal. Im Grunde genommen muss man dafür nur die Infobox setzen. Und dann auf dem Wikidata-Item den Link zu der commonscat setzen. Ich gehe meistens auch, was diew NSGs angeht über Wikidata, weil die dort meistens denselben Namen haben wie in der WDPA und die dort alle eingetragen zu sein scheinen.

Und klar! Lass uns mal zusammen eine Tour machen. Wann wäre es bei dir gut?

Viele Grüße --DavidJRasp (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Von mir aus könnten wir die Sankt Arnualer Wiesen nächsten Montag besuchen, ich schlage als Treffpunkt den Bahnübergamg am Zollhaus vor, um 15 Uhr, wenn Dir eine andere Uhrzeit lieber ist, sag bescheid. Ich werde die Pfaffenmütze aus Güdingen anhaben, damit werde ich wohl unverkennbar sein. --anro (talk)

Der Treffpunkt klingt gut, die Uhrzeit geht nur leider für mich nicht. Am Montag könnte ich erst ab 17:30. Alternativ würde ich den Mittwoch vorschlagen. Da habe ich den ganzen Tag Zeit. Würde eins davon für dich gehen?

Der Eingang am Zollhaus ist der an der Straße Zur Alten Fähre? Ein unverkennbares Merkmal habe ich zwar jetzt nicht, aber ich bin recht hoch gewachsen und dadurch zumindest schwer zu übersehen. Abgesehen davon trage ich eine Brille mit rundlichen Gläsern. Ich freu mich auf jeden Fall schon! :) --DavidJRasp (talk) 11:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Also von mir aus Mittwoch. Da könnte vorausichtlich auch meine Freundin mitgehen. Bleiben wir beim selben Treffpunkt und nehmen die Uhrzeit "High Noon" aber bitte ohne Knarren, wie beim gleichnamigen Wsstern - ich werde unbewaffnet erscheinen aber gleichermaßen "Behütet"...

Das Zollhaus ist das neuklassizistische Gebäude hinter dem Bahnübergang, heute Fortbildungsstätte der Halberger Hütte, wo auch der jüngste Saarbrücker Tatort gedreht wurde. Wir treffen uns am Bahnübergang davor. anro (talk) 13:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

High Noon am Mittwoch, nur ohne Revolver ist notiert! Und gut, dann weiß ich, wo das ist. Ich werde wohl aus Richtung der Saarbahn kommen. --DavidJRasp (talk) 15:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:20181027Rosa canina.jpg

moin David,

das ist für mich viel eher die Weinrose (Rosa rubiginosa). charakteristisch sind die Dornen auf der Frucht und die erhaltenen Kelchblätter. Es kann aber auch ein Hybrid sein.

guss --anro (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo AnRo,

Ja, da hast du recht. Danke dir! Ich hab die Beschreibung auch gleich mal geändert und ein Move-Request gestellt.

Gruß --DavidJRasp (talk) 10:02, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Done (zufälligerweise bin ich auch commons-admin) --anro (talk) 10:49, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

File:20200215State forest Saarbrücken12.jpg und File:20200215State forest Saarbrücken13.jpg

moin David,

bist Du dir sicher, dass es sich dabei um die Früchte einer Birke handelt? Für mich sieht das eher nach Haselnuss (Corylus avellana) aus. --anro (talk) 13:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Andreas,

Nein, bei denen war ich mir wirklich nicht sicher. Und jetzt wo du es sagst, denke ich, dass du da recht hast, dass es eher die Blüte einer Haselnuss ist. --DavidJRasp (talk) 08:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Autopatroller

Hi, DavidJRasp! You have made a lot of good work and your edits do not need to be patrolled anymore, so I just made you autopatroller. Thank you for your good work! Taivo (talk) 06:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Taivo! Thanks a lot. :) I'm having a lot of fun here on Commons and other Wikis. Best --DavidJRasp (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo DavidJRasp,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200408Branta canadensis02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200408Alopochen aegyptiacus01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Horse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Dark imo. Otherwise fine. --ArildV 06:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC) …but no good composition -- Spurzem 14:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserturm Völklinger Hütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Why use f/3.2? and 1/3200 sec. Were you on a train? --Moroder 01:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200725 Kleinsche Anlage 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200413 Mozartschule Jägersfreude 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's leaning on the left --Moroder 01:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC) @Moroder: Thanks for the feedback! I did some pc on it. Is it better now? --DavidJRasp 12:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Vincent60030 15:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alopochen aegyptiacus Saarland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A chaotic scene, but the aggressor has been sharply captured in amongst the rain and splash and blurred feathers, and I'd say that this makes up for the patches of colour noise visible in some parts. --Bobulous 19:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

File:20180922 Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Metz 08.jpg

File:20180922 Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Metz 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VIGNERON (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200316 Schloss Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. --Vincent60030 09:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Leipzig_photographs_taken_on_2020-09-11

Leipzig photographs taken on 2020-09-11 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

MKBler (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear DavidJRasp,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

File:20190707 Liebfrauenkirche Koblenz 02.jpg

File:20190707 Liebfrauenkirche Koblenz 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:European Parliament in Strasbourg.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo DavidJRasp,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210320 Evangelische Kirche Mettlach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20181225 Betriebshof Nord U-Bahn München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210508 Orchis purpurea 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are dust spots top left of the inflorescence + perhaps a little added space on the left would be nice? --Nefronus 20:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC) Removed the spots and centered the inflorescence. --DavidJRasp 21:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good. --Nefronus 07:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210508 Dolycoris baccarum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210609 Johannisbrücke Saarbrücken 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:07, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201017 Gare de Metz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200806 Luitpoldhügel in Munich 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20200904 St. Foillan Aachen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 07.jpg

File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20201031 Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Püttlingen 04.jpg

And also:

• File:20201031 Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Püttlingen 05.jpg
• File:20201031 Kloster Heilig-Kreuz Püttlingen 06.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:53, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 01.jpg

And also:

• File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 03.jpg
• File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 04.jpg
• File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 05.jpg
• File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 06.jpg
• File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 07.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20200904 Aachen Cathedral 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201021 Paradies Völklingen Ironworks 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --John Stockla 11:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20191109Blies-Grenz-Weg 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality . --MaedaAkihiko 14:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo DavidJRasp,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Foto von der Kaffeeküche der ehemaligen Grube Luisenthal

Hallo David,
du hast etliche Fotos von der Grube Luisenthal eingestellt. Große Bitte: Könntest du bei Gelegenheit noch eines von der ehemaligen Kaffeeküche machen, bevor dort alles platt gemacht wird? Als Exilsaarländer komme ich auf Grund der Entfernung nicht mehr so oft in die Heimat. Das Foto würde perfekt in den Kaffeeküchen-Artikel passen. Vielen Dank im Voraus!
--Exilsaarländer (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Exilsaarländer,

Leider wohne ich auch nicht mehr im Saarland und bin dort erst mal nicht zu Besuch. Wann soll das denn plattgemacht werden? Vielleicht könnte @AnRo0002 das auch übernehmen?

-- DavidJRasp (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

@Exilsaarländer

grundsätzlich wäre ich bereit, mir das mal anzuschauen, zumal ich schon länger nicht mehr an der Grube Luisenthal war. Ich hoffe ich erhalte Zugang zu dem Gelände mit Genehmigung der RAG, Photos zu machen

gruss anro (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Die Abrissarbeiten haben offensichtlich schon begonnen, s. hier. Da kann man nur hoffen, dass z.B. die Kaffeeküche noch steht. In der OSM-Karte ist sie jedenfalls noch eingetragen.

@anro: Wäre prima, wenn du die Kaffeeküche und vlt. noch mehr fotografieren könntest. Die Kaffeeküche ist lt. OSM-Karte direkt am Eingangs, so dass du eventuell von der Schranke aus das/die Foto/s machen kannst, d.h. ohne genehmigungspflichtigen(?) Zugang zum Gelände. Schon mal vielen Dank im Voraus!

@David:Danke für deine Antwort und die Vermittlung von anro!

--Exilsaarländer (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Hat sich erledigt: Die Kaffeeküche wurde bereits abgerissen - obwohl das Gebäude m.W. unter Denkmalschutz stand. Exilsaarländer (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

@Exilsaarländer: Das ist wirklich sehr schade. Tut mir leid, dass ich sie nicht abfotografieren konnte. DavidJRasp (talk) 15:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Hier unter der Kategorie Grube Luisenthal auf Commons ein paar Fotos (2022_04 ...). Das Tor war offen, so dass ich aufs Gelände konnte. Exilsaarländer (talk) 12:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

@Exilsaarländer: Super! Danke dir für die Fotos. Ich denke die sind eine gute Ergänzung für die Kategorie. DavidJRasp (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201105 Aschbachkirche Gersweiler 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not very sharp, but OK. --Augustgeyler 14:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200411Bergehalde Grühlingstraße 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210617 Ludwigsbrücke München.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Some more categories would be helpful. --Ermell 11:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201021 Sinter plant Völklingen Ironworks 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and well lit, but it's leaning out (fixable) and needs better categorization. --MB-one 09:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)  Done @MB-one: thanks for the comments, uploaded another version with pc now --DavidJRasp 12:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211211 Valkenburg Construction Site 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To make it useful the machines should be categorised. Some CA at the left to remove as well. --Ermell 17:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: , thanks for the review! Did the categorization as detailed as possible for me --DavidJRasp 21:21, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks that´s very good. --Ermell 16:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201021 Sinter plant Völklingen Ironworks 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dark, good quality anyway. --Yeriho 17:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210611 Ausbesserungswerk Saarbrücken-Burbach 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)  Done @Steindy: , thanks for the review! --DavidJRasp 13:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210102 Theatinerkirche Munich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210711 Völklingen Ironworks 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210710 Stengelkirche Wellesweiler 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210802 Verwaltungsbau des Bayerischen Leichtmetallwerks 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support dust spot small, but OK for me. --Rjcastillo 01:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210710 Altstadter Glockenturm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please fill in whit part in right bottom corner --Michielverbeek 19:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC) And the left side seems leaning out. --Tournasol7 21:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Ok, for me now --Michielverbeek 06:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210609 Berliner Promenade Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201231 Fröttmaninger Berg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:32, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200508 St. Josef Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 08:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210807 Gertrudiskapelle 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 21:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210814 Oxythyrea funesta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 13:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210703 Kloster Wörschweiler 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot to remove. --Steindy 00:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)  Done @Steindy: thanks for the review! --DavidJRasp 09:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 13:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20200701Evangelische Kirche Güdingen21.jpg

And also:

• File:20200701Evangelische Kirche Güdingen23.jpg
• File:20200701Evangelische Kirche Güdingen24.jpg
• File:20200701Evangelische Kirche Güdingen25.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210814 Katholisches Schulhaus Mainzweiler Ottweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin Hechenwang Nah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 19:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasteig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210409 Coccinella septempunctata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Adamant1 11:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180422Eisengießer Brebach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Oberstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals should be corrected. --Ermell 21:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: Thank you for the review! --DavidJRasp 22:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Sankt Franziskus Nah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210627 Argynnis paphia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210821 Vaterland Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210821 Saarstahl MGS Kaianlage 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo FlocciNivis/Archive 1,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
• 
  Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
• 
  Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
• 
  Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
• 
  Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
• 
  Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
• 
  männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt, wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zur Wettbewerbskategorie Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldrainen und Feldgehölzen in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --~~~~

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220526 Harmonia axyridis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220521 Carterocephalus palaemon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo FlocciNivis,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

File:20180107 Erzabtei St. Ottilien 06.jpg

File:20180107 Erzabtei St. Ottilien 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateus2019 (talk) 14:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Photo list

Hello! Your "Inherited photographs"-List is very interesting and of outstanding encyclopedic value. Thanks for bringing those images here! Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 21:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you very much for your comment. You saying that those pictures are of outstanding encyclopedic value makes me really happy! And I'm far from done. There are many more pictures my father made, that I will upload. Best regards, FlocciNivis (talk) 22:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220917 St. Ursula Munich 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210919 St. Josef Saarbrücken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great quality. --Stratokumulus 14:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210423 Friedrichsplatz Mannheim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220806 Bahnhof Berlin Jannowitzbrücke 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210821 Rangierbahnhof Burbacher Hütte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 Statue Sanssouci 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 Statue Sanssouci 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020810 Schloss Sanssouci 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 Königliches Zivilkabinetthaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 09:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20211106 St. Johann Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me if you remove the vignetting (see the corners, they are darker) and sharpen it a bit, it's too soft --Poco a poco 08:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)  Done @Poco a poco: thank you for your feedback! --FlocciNivis 15:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC) Please, a bit less sharpening, you went a bit too far --Poco a poco 10:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)  Done @Poco a poco: Ok! Now it's a bit less sharp --FlocciNivis 16:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220905 Nordfriedhof München 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220905 Nordfriedhof München 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220820 Rathausplatz 8 Esslingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220924 Gelbe Treppe Königsbau Münchner Residenz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 11:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220924 Hofgarten München 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220905 Nordfriedhof München 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180714 Schlosskirche Mannheim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220924 Statues Münchner Residenz 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220807 Nationaldenkmal auf dem Kreuzberg Berlin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220807 Swinemünder Brücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220806 Bahnhof Berlin Friedrichstraße 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 17:10, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 St. Nikolaikirche Potsdam 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200408 Splitterschutzzelle Burbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:43, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220406 Dirnismaning 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Dark and Harsh lights, but enough subtle. --Sebring12Hrs 07:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200816 Echelmeyerpark Saarbrücken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220808 Chirurgie Beelitz-Heilstätten 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 07:15, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220806 Buttbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 Orangerieschloss 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220805 Friedrichswerdersche Kirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 10:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220805 Friedrichswerdersche Kirche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 15:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 Orangerieschloss 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 10:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220805 Soviet Cenotaph in Berlin-Tiergarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 St. Nikolaikirche Potsdam 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220811 Französische Friedrichstadtkirche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200408 Historische Kohlenwäsche Saarbrücken-Burbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals --Ermell 21:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: I tried to fix the verticals now --FlocciNivis 20:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 21:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220812 Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220730 Wasserturm Stadtwerke München 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 St. Nikolaikirche Potsdam 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tone curves may be improved --Ezarate 21:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ezarate: I tinkered a bit with the tone curve. Can you give me some feedback if this is what you imagined? --FlocciNivis 12:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. acceptable now --Ezarate 23:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 St. Nikolaikirche Potsdam 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Try to increase the light in the shadows (and improve the highlights too) --Ezarate 21:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)  Done @Ezarate: Did so, now it's very visible how dirty the roof is --FlocciNivis 12:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. acceptable now --Ezarate 23:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220811 Französische Friedrichstadtkirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This seems every so slightly, but noticeably, crooked: Could you correct the perspective? --Lrkrol 14:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)  Done @Lrkrol: Thank you for the feedback! --FlocciNivis 18:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Great, promoted! --Lrkrol 11:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220810 Colonnades Neues Palais Potsdam 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Strong presence of harsh lights and dark shadows. --Sebring12Hrs 07:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)  Done @Sebring12Hrs: Thank you for the feedback. I adjusted that now a bit --FlocciNivis 17:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)